Cited by 432Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

The next-generation Open Targets Platform: reimagined, redesigned, rebuilt

Open access
Ochoa, David, Hercules, Andrew, Carmona, Miguel, Suveges, Daniel, Baker, Jarrod, Malangone, Cinzia, Lopez, Irene, Miranda, Alfredo +26 more·2023·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The Open Targets Platform (https://platform.opentargets.org/) is an open source resource to systematically assist drug target identification and prioritisation using publicly available data. Since our last update, we have reimagined, redesigned, and rebuilt the Platform in order to streamline data integration and harmonisation, expand the ways in which users can explore the data, and improve the user experience. The gene–disease causal evidence has been enhanced and expanded to better capture disease causality across rare, common, and somatic diseases. For target and drug annotations, we have incorporated new features that help assess target safety and tractability, including genetic constraint, PROTACtability assessments, and AlphaFold structure predictions. We have also introduced new machine learning applications for knowledge extraction from the published literature, clinical trial information, and drug labels. The new technologies and frameworks introduced since the last update will ease the introduction of new features and the creation of separate instances of the Platform adapted to user requirements. Our new Community forum, expanded training materials, and outreach programme support our users in a range of use cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkac1046

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By assembling heterogeneous data types such as those included in Pharos, an ML-ready KG can capture data from major areas specific for human protein-coding genes: phenotype and disease, pathways, and interactions.

    “By assembling heterogeneous data types such as those included in Pharos (22), an ML-ready KG can capture data from major areas specific for human protein-coding genes: phenotype and disease, pathways, and interactions.”

    From Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet? (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction sections on enhanced target–disease evidence and improving target characterisation describe Open Targets integrating disease and phenotype evidence, pathways, and molecular interactions. But the citation is attached to Pharos, while this paper describes Open Targets; our copy does not establish that Pharos contains those data types or that assembling them produces an ML-ready knowledge graph. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ochoa, D., Hercules, A., Carmona, M., Suveges, D., Baker, J., Malangone, C., Lopez, I., Miranda, A., Cruz-Castillo, C., Fumis, L., Bernal-Llinares, M., Tsukanov, K., Cornu, H., Tsirigos, K., Razuvayevskaya, O., Buniello, A., Schwartzentruber, J., Karim, M., Ariano, B., Martinez Osorio, R. E., Ferrer, J., Ge, X., Machlitt-Northen, S., Gonzalez-Uriarte, A., Saha, S., Tirunagari, S., Mehta, C., Roldán-Romero, J. M., Horswell, S., Young, S., Ghoussaini, M., Hulcoop, D. G., Dunham, I., & McDonagh, E. M.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Open Targets, Wellcome Genome Campus , Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, UK
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline plc, GSK Medicines Research Centre , Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, UK
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Ochoa, David
  • McDonagh, Ellen M
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2022-11-18
Volume
51
Issue
D1
Pages
D1353-D1359
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4309306035
Cited by
432
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 108 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 55
FWCI
46.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (206194)
  • Open Targets
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
Open Targets Platform, drug target prioritization, drug target identification, genetic constraints, AlphaFold structure prediction, clinical trial data, drug labels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review