Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 816

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

edgeR v4: powerful differential analysis of sequencing data with expanded functionality and improved support for small counts and larger datasets

Open access
Chen, Yunshun, Chen, Lizhong, Lun, Aaron T L, Baldoni, Pedro L, Smyth, Gordon K·2025·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

edgeR is an R/Bioconductor software package for differential analyses of sequencing data in the form of read counts for genes or genomic features. Over the past 15 years, edgeR has been a popular choice for statistical analysis of data from sequencing technologies such as RNA-seq or ChIP-seq. edgeR pioneered the use of the negative binomial distribution to model read count data with replicates and the use of generalized linear models to analyze complex experimental designs. edgeR implements empirical Bayes moderation methods to allow reliable inference when the number of replicates is small. This article announces edgeR version 4, which includes new developments across a range of application areas. Infrastructure improvements include support for fractional counts, implementation of model fitting in C and a new statistical treatment of the quasi-likelihood pipeline that improves accuracy for small counts. The revised package has new functionality for differential methylation analysis, differential transcript expression, differential transcript and exon usage, testing relative to a fold-change threshold and pathway analysis. This article reviews the statistical framework and computational implementation of edgeR, briefly summarizing all the existing features and functionalities but with special attention to new features and those that have not been described previously.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkaf018

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lin, 2022, Benchmarking differential expression, imputation and quantification methods for proteomics data, Brief Bioinform, 23, bbac138, 10.1093/bib/bbac138 · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac138
  2. Baldoni, 2024, Faster and more accurate assessment of differential transcript expression with Gibbs sampling and edgeR v4, NAR Genom Bioinform, 6, lqae151, 10.1093/nargab/lqae151 · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqae151
  3. Chen, 2013, Differential expression analysis of complex RNA-seq experiments

Cited by

See all 816

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y., Chen, L., Lun, A. T. L., Baldoni, P. L., & Smyth, G. K.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2025-01-11
Volume
53
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4406778273
Cited by
816
References
80
FWCI
199.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (2019-207283, 2021-237445)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1058892, 2025645, 1176199)
  • Department of Health, State Government of Victoria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: edgeR v4: powerful differential analysis of sequencing data with expanded functionality and improved support for small counts and larger datasets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkaf018
The paper
Chen, Y., Chen, L., Lun, A. T. L., Baldoni, P. L., & Smyth, G. K. (2025). edgeR v4: powerful differential analysis of sequencing data with expanded functionality and improved support for small counts and larger datasets. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaf018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.