The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data
Open accessAbstract
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive ordering of all proteins of known structure, according to their evolutionary and structural relationships. Protein domains in SCOP are hierarchically classified into families, superfamilies, folds and classes. The continual accumulation of sequence and structural data allows more rigorous analysis and provides important information for understanding the protein world and its evolutionary repertoire. SCOP participates in a project that aims to rationalize and integrate the data on proteins held in several sequence and structure databases. As part of this project, starting with release 1.63, we have initiated a refinement of the SCOP classification, which introduces a number of changes mostly at the levels below superfamily. The pending SCOP reclassification will be carried out gradually through a number of future releases. In addition to the expanded set of static links to external resources, available at the level of domain entries, we have started modernization of the interface capabilities of SCOP allowing more dynamic links with other databases. SCOP can be accessed at http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complete Structure of the 11-Subunit Bovine Mitochondrial Cytochrome bc 1 Complex
Iwata, S., Lee, J. W., Okada, K., Lee, J. K., Iwata, M., Rasmussen, B., Link, T. A., Ramaswamy, S., & Jap, B. K. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5373.64 · Cited by 1,253
The Protein Data Bank: unifying the archive
Westbrook, J. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.245 · Cited by 309
Cited by
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“The identi-fication of suitable templates is achieved by scanning structure databases, such as PDB (Berman et al., 2000), SCOP (Andreeva et al., 2004), DALI (Holm et al., 2006; also see Dietmann et al., 2001), and CATH (Pearl et al., 2005), with the target sequence as the query.”
MethodD2P2: database of disordered protein predictions
Oates, M. E., Romero, P., Ishida, T., Ghalwash, M., Mizianty, M. J., Xue, B., Dosztányi, Z., Uversky, V. N., Obradovic, Z., Kurgan, L., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1226 · Cited by 705
Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
Keskin, O., Gursoy, A., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040409x · Cited by 697
Radauer, C., Bublin, M., Wagner, S., Mari, A., & Breiteneder, H. (2008) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.01.025 · Cited by 429
Protein Family Expansions and Biological Complexity
Vogel, C., & Chothia, C. (2006) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020048 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Andreeva, A.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 90001
- Pages
- 226D-229
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2125725297
- Cited by
- 909
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkh039
- The paper
- Andreeva, A. (2004). SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
