The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The FoldX web server: an online force field
Open accessAbstract
FoldX is an empirical force field that was developed for the rapid evaluation of the effect of mutations on the stability, folding and dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids. The core functionality of FoldX, namely the calculation of the free energy of a macromolecule based on its high-resolution 3D structure, is now publicly available through a web server at http://foldx.embl.de/. The current release allows the calculation of the stability of a protein, calculation of the positions of the protons and the prediction of water bridges, prediction of metal binding sites and the analysis of the free energy of complex formation. Alanine scanning, the systematic truncation of side chains to alanine, is also included. In addition, some reporting functions have been added, and it is now possible to print both the atomic interaction networks that constitute the protein, print the structural and energetic details of the interactions per atom or per residue, as well as generate a general quality report of the pdb structure. This core functionality will be further extended as more FoldX applications are developed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The empirical energy-based methods, exemplified by STATIUM [12], FoldX [8] and Discovery Studio [13], have accelerated the prediction but suffered from insufficient conformational sampling, especially for mutations in flexible regions.”
From Deep geometric representations for modeling effects of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“We observed FoldX [8] and BeAtMuSic [38] yield the lowest correlations and the highest root-mean-square error (RMSE) on these datasets, indicating the difficulty of gauging the impacts of mutations via empirical energy-based methods.”
From Deep geometric representations for modeling effects of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Previous methods were limited either in terms of their throughput (21,22) or in terms of their performance (23).”
From mCSM-PPI2: predicting the effects of mutations on protein–protein interactions (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling
Guex, N., & Peitsch, M. C. (1997) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/elps.1150181505 · Cited by 11,297 · cited 1×
“Although the pdb-reader in FoldX is continually extended to handle more exceptions, standardizing the format of anomalous files most often solves the problem—this can easily be achieved by opening and saving the file using Swiss PDB viewer (14) or WHATIF (15).”
MethodThe interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility
Lee, B., & Richards, F. M. (1971) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x · Cited by 5,884 · cited 1×
“The occupancy of an atom i, Occ(i), is calculated using an envelope function (21) with a distance cut-off of 6 s (9).”
MethodWHAT IF: A molecular modeling and drug design program
Vriend, G. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(90)80070-v · Cited by 3,476 · cited 1×
“Although the pdb-reader in FoldX is continually extended to handle more exceptions, standardizing the format of anomalous files most often solves the problem—this can easily be achieved by opening and saving the file using Swiss PDB viewer (14) or WHATIF (15).”
MethodGuerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00442-4 · Cited by 1,728 · cited 3×
“In addition, those water molecules that have a persistent interaction with groups of the protein, i.e. make more than two hydrogen bonds with the protein, are calculated explicitly in the D G wb term (8,9).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPrediction of sequence-dependent and mutational effects on the aggregation of peptides and proteins
Fernández‐Escamilla, A. M., Rousseau, F., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., & Serrano, L. G. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1012 · Cited by 1,667 · cited 1×
“In this fashion, TANGO predicts correctly both the disease causing and protective mutations in a wide range of proteins including Alzheimers’ A b peptide, lysozyme and transthyretin (12).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAbagyan, R. A., & Totrov, M. M. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1994.1052 · Cited by 982 · cited 8×
“The statistical mechanics algorithm TANGO, publicly available at http:// TANGO.embl.de/, provides such a predictive model.”
MethodInfluentialMolecular basis for amyloid fibril formation and stability
Makin, O. S., Atkins, E. D. T., Sikorski, P., Johansson, J., & Serpell, L. C. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0406847102 · Cited by 649 · cited 1×
“For protein aggregation no such detail is available, although recently the first ever crystal structure of an amyloid fibre was released (23).”
BackgroundEffective energy functions for protein structure prediction
Lazaridis, T. (2000) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00063-4 · Cited by 445 · cited 1×
“These are designated by Lazaridis and Karplus (1) as statistical (SEEF) and physical (PEEF) effective energy functions, respectively.”
BackgroundProtein-misfolding diseases: Getting out of shape
Dobson, C. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/418729a · Cited by 341 · cited 1×
“The crystal structure confirms the widespread observation in the field that protein aggregates are generally rich in cross-beta structure (24), which allows a low-resolution structural approach to predict protein aggregation.”
BackgroundRational design of faster associating and tighter binding protein complexes.
Schreiber, G., Selzer, T., & Albeck, S. (2000) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/76744 · Cited by 299 · cited 1×
“(10), which was shown to give a good estimation of the association rate ( k on ) of complex formation.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,005
Faraj, S. E., Román, E. A., Arán, M., Gallo, M. L., & Santos, J. (2014) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.12869 · Cited by 29
Freitas, F. C., Ferreira, P. H. B., Favaro, D. C., & de Oliveira, R. J. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01320 · Cited by 29
Tsai, K., Lee, Y.-C., & Tseng, T.-S. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.698365 · Cited by 32
Agonist antibody discovery: Experimental, computational, and rational engineering approaches
Schardt, J. S., Jhajj, H. S., O’Meara, R. L., Lwo, T. S., Smith, M. D., & Tessier, P. M. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.09.008 · Cited by 32
Protein Function Analysis through Machine Learning
Avery, C., Patterson, J., Grear, T. J., Frater, T. D., & Jacobs, D. J. (2022) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom12091246 · Cited by 30
The Challenge of Next Generation Sequencing in the Context of Neuromuscular Diseases
Lek, M., & MacArthur, D. G. (2014) · Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases · doi:10.3233/jnd-140032 · Cited by 29
Culurgioni, S., Muñoz, I. G., Moreno, A., Palacios, A., Villate, M., Palmero, I., Montoya, G., & Blanco, F. J. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.330001 · Cited by 32
McCorvie, T. J., & Timson, D. J. (2013) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2013.04.061 · Cited by 29
A Rational Engineering Strategy for Designing Protein A-Binding Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies
Henry, K. A., Sulea, T. I., van Faassen, H., Hussack, G., Purisima, E. O., MacKenzie, C. R., & Arbabi‐Ghahroudi, M. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163113 · Cited by 31
Zimmermann, M. T., Urrutia, R. A., Oliver, G. R., Blackburn, P. R., Cousin, M. A., Bozeck, N. J., & Klee, E. W. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170822 · Cited by 29
Free energy perturbation calculations of mutation effects on SARS-CoV-2 RBD::ACE2 binding affinity
Sergeeva, A. P., Katsamba, P. S., Liao, J., Sampson, J. M., Bahna, F., Mannepalli, S., Morano, N. C., Shapiro, L., Friesner, R. A., & Honig, B. (2023) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168187 · Cited by 27
“[11] Schymkowitz J, Borg J, Stricher F, Nys R, Rousseau F, Serrano L.”
InfluentialMansilla, S., Tórtora, V., Pignataro, M. F., Sastre, S., Castro, I. H., Chiribao, M. L., Robello, C., Zeida, A., Santos, J., & Castro, L. (2023) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.01.028 · Cited by 27
Aggrescan4D: structure-informed analysis of pH-dependent protein aggregation
Bárcenas, O., Kuriata, A., Zalewski, M., Iglesias, V., Pintado‐Grima, C., Firlik, G., Burdukiewicz, M. J., Kmiecik, S., & Ventura, S. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae382 · Cited by 28
Aer, L., Jiang, Q., Zhong, L., Si, Q., Liu, X., Pan, Y., Feng, J., Zeng, H., & Tang, L. (2024) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134887 · Cited by 28
Rational enzyme design by reducing the number of hotspots and library size
Qin, Z., Yuan, B., Qu, G., & Sun, Z. (2024) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/d4cc01394h · Cited by 28
Molecular Binding Mechanism of TtgR Repressor to Antibiotics and Antimicrobials
Fernández‐Escamilla, A. M., Fernandez-Ballester, G. J., Morel, B., Casares, S., & Ramos, J. L. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138469 · Cited by 28
Kumar, V., Islam, A., Hassan, M. I., & Ahmad, F. (2016) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.06.011 · Cited by 29
Organization and evolution of the chalcone synthase gene family in bread wheat and relative species
Glagoleva, A. Y., Ivanisenko, N. V., & Хлесткина, Е. К. (2019) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12863-019-0727-y · Cited by 28
de Oliveira, A. A., Faustino, J., de Lima, M. E., de Menezes, R. P., & Nunes, K. P. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20133121 · Cited by 29
Computational re-design of protein structures to improve solubility
Navarro, S., & Ventura, S. (2019) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2019.1637413 · Cited by 29
Computational Nanoscopy of Tight Junctions at the Blood–Brain Barrier Interface
Rajagopal, N., Irudayanathan, F. J., & Nangia, S. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20225583 · Cited by 30
Vedithi, S. C., Rodrigues, C. H. M., Portelli, S., Skwark, M. J., Das, M., Ascher, D. B., Blundell, T. L., & Malhotra, S. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.01.002 · Cited by 27
Specific targeting of IL-1β activity to CD8+ T cells allows for safe use as a vaccine adjuvant
Eeckhout, B. V. D., Hoecke, L. V., Burg, E., Lint, S. V., Peelman, F., Kley, N., Uzé, G., Saelens, X., Tavernier, J. H., & Gerlo, S. (2020) · npj Vaccines · doi:10.1038/s41541-020-00211-5 · Cited by 28
Kumar, M., & Papaleo, E. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71527-4 · Cited by 26
Conformational changes in tubulin upon binding cryptophycin-52 reveal its mechanism of action
Eren, E., Watts, N. R. M., Sackett, D. L., & Wingfield, P. T. (2021) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101138 · Cited by 29
Louros, N., Ramakers, M., Michiels, E., Konstantoulea, K., Morelli, C., Garcia, T., Moonen, N., D’Haeyer, S., Goossens, V., Thal, D. R., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28955-9 · Cited by 28
Self-citationMutant MESD links cellular stress to type I collagen aggregation in osteogenesis imperfecta type XX
Ghosh, D. K., Udupa, P., Shrikondawar, A. N., Bhavani, G. S., Shah, H. H., Ranjan, A., & Girisha, K. M. (2022) · Matrix Biology · doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2022.12.001 · Cited by 29
Blackburn, P. R., Tischer, A., Zimmermann, M. T., Kemppainen, J. L., Sastry, S., Johnson, A. E. K., Cousin, M. A., Boczek, N. J., Oliver, G. R., Misra, V. K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m116.770545 · Cited by 28
Uchiyama, Y., Yanagisawa, K., Kunishima, S., et al. (2018) · Clinical Genetics · doi:10.1111/cge.13423 · Cited by 28
Distinct Allosteric Networks Underlie Mechanistic Speciation of ABC Transporters
Acar, B., Rose, J., Fas, B. A., Ben‐Tal, N., Lewinson, O., & Haliloǧlu, T. (2020) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2020.03.014 · Cited by 29
Recent advances in automated protein design and its future challenges
Setiawan, D., Brender, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2018.1465922 · Cited by 26
“Almost every scoring function used in popular protein design algorithms, such as those used in RosettaDesign [128,153,171], FoldX [122], or OSPREY [106], falls into this category.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPeptide design through binding interface mimicry with PepMimic
(2025) · doi:10.1038/s41551-025-01507-4 · Cited by 30
Analysing protein complexes in plant science: insights and limitation with AlphaFold 3
Lin, P.-Y., Huang, S.-C., Chen, K.-L., Huang, Y., Liao, C.-Y., Lin, G.-J., Lee, H., & Chen, P. (2025) · Botanical studies · doi:10.1186/s40529-025-00462-2 · Cited by 38
IFIT5 Participates in the Antiviral Mechanisms of Rainbow Trout Red Blood Cells
Chico, V., Salvador-Mira, M. E., Nombela, I., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00613 · Cited by 27
Conti, S., & Karplus, M. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006954 · Cited by 27
Besse, A., Brezavar, D., Hanson, J., Larson, A. A., & Bonnen, P. E. (2020) · Mitochondrion · doi:10.1016/j.mito.2020.01.004 · Cited by 28
Liang, Y., Lyon, R. C., Pellman, J., Bradford, W. H., Lange, S., Bogomolovas, J., Dalton, N. D., Gu, Y., Bobar, M., Lee, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci137689 · Cited by 27
The MYC oncoprotein directly interacts with its chromatin cofactor PNUTS to recruit PP1 phosphatase
Wei, Y., Redel, C., Ahlner, A., Lemak, A. S., Johansson-Åkhe, I., Houliston, S., Kenney, T. M. G., Tamachi, A., Morad, V., Duan, S., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac138 · Cited by 28
Predicting protein stability changes upon mutation using a simple orientational potential
Hernández, I. M., Dehouck, Y., Bastolla, U., López‐Blanco, J. R., & Chacón, P. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad011 · Cited by 29
Association Between Foldability and Aggregation Propensity in Small Disulfide-Rich Proteins
Fraga, H., Graña‐Montes, R., Illa, R., Covaleda, G., & Ventura, S. (2014) · Antioxidants and Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2013.5543 · Cited by 26
Reumers, J., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., & Rousseau, F. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-s8-s9 · Cited by 27
Self-citationChoi, Y., Choi, H. J., Kim, D., Uhm, K.-N., & Kim, H. K. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2442-5 · Cited by 27
Accurate Prediction of the Dynamical Changes within the Second PDZ Domain of PTP1e
Cilia, E., Vuister, G. W., & Lenaerts, T. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002794 · Cited by 27
The characterization of a thermostable and cambialistic superoxide dismutase from Thermus filiformis
Mandelli, F., Cairo, J. P. L. F., Citadini, A. P., et al. (2013) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/lam.12071 · Cited by 27
Folding RaCe: a robust method for predicting changes in protein folding rates upon point mutations
Chaudhary, P., Naganathan, A. N., & Gromiha, M. M. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv091 · Cited by 27
Carlin, D. A., Hapig-Ward, S., Chan, B. W., Damrau, N., Riley, M. G., Caster, R. W., Bethards, B., & Siegel, J. B. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176255 · Cited by 27
Improved Solution-State Properties of Monoclonal Antibodies by Targeted Mutations
Kuhn, A. B., Kube, S., Karow‐Zwick, A. R., et al. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b09126 · Cited by 27
High‐affinity PD ‐1 molecules deliver improved interaction with PD ‐L1 and PD ‐L2
Li, Y., Liang, Z., Tian, Y., Cai, W., Weng, Z., Chen, L., Zhang, H., Bao, Y., Zeng, S.-H., Zeng, S., et al. (2018) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/cas.13666 · Cited by 27
Hodges, A. M., Fenton, A. W., Dougherty, L. L., Overholt, A. C., & Swint‐Kruse, L. (2018) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.23616 · Cited by 27
Luo, S., Su, Y., Wu, Z., Su, C., Peng, J., & Ma, J. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.02.28.530137 · Cited by 31
Sen, N., Anishchenko, I., Bordin, N., Sillitoe, I., Velankar, S., Baker, D., & Orengo, C. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac187 · Cited by 25
Quantification of biases in predictions of protein–protein binding affinity changes upon mutations
Tsishyn, M., Pucci, F., & Rooman, M. J. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad491 · Cited by 33
From traditional to AI-driven: The evolution of intelligent enzyme engineering for biocatalysis
Lv, F., Zhang, J., You, S., & Qi, W. (2025) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2025.108788 · Cited by 31
Kalinina, O. V., Pfeifer, N., & Lengauer, T. (2013) · Retrovirology · doi:10.1186/1742-4690-10-130 · Cited by 26
Baltoumas, F. A., Theodoropoulou, M. C., & Hamodrakas, S. J. (2016) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-016-9919-y · Cited by 26
Grafting PNIPAAm from β-barrel shaped transmembrane nanopores
Charan, H., Kinzel, J., Glebe, U., Anand, D., Garakani, T. M., Zhu, L., Bocola, M., Schwaneberg, U., & Böker, A. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.033 · Cited by 26
Arezumand, R., Mahdian, R., Zeinali, S., Hassanzadeh‐Ghassabeh, G., Mansouri, K., Khanahmad, H., Asl, N. N., Rahimi, H., Behdani, M., Cohan, R. A., et al. (2016) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2016.09.012 · Cited by 26
Martínez‐Mármol, R., Pérez-Verdaguer, M., Roig, S. R., Vallejo-Gracia, A., Gotsi, P., Serrano-Albarrás, A., Bahamonde, M. I., Ferrer-Montiel, A. V., Fernandez-Ballester, G. J., Comes, N., et al. (2013) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.134825 · Cited by 26
Astl, L., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01045 · Cited by 24
Lv, X., Chen, J., Lu, Y., Chen, Z., Xiao, N., & Yang, Y. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00064 · Cited by 26
Cheng, F., Chen, X., Li, M., et al. (2020) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2020.109655 · Cited by 26
High affinity Na + transport by wheat HKT1;5 is blocked by K +
Xu, B., Hrmová, M., & Gilliham, M. (2020) · Plant Direct · doi:10.1002/pld3.275 · Cited by 27
SCONES: Self-Consistent Neural Network for Protein Stability Prediction Upon Mutation
L, Y. S. B., Raghunathan, S., & Priyakumar, U. D. (2021) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c04913 · Cited by 24
G protein inactive and active forms investigated by simulation methods
Khafizov, K., Lattanzi, G., & Carloni, P. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22303 · Cited by 27
A Role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tpa1 Protein in Direct Alkylation Repair
Shivange, G., Kodipelli, N., Mohan, M., & Anindya, R. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.590216 · Cited by 26
SPROUTS: a database for the evaluation of protein stability upon point mutation
Lonquety, M., Lacroix, Z., Papandreou, N. C., & Chomilier, J. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn704 · Cited by 26
Rallapalli, P. M., Orengo, C. A., Studer, R. A., & Perkins, S. J. (2014) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msu248 · Cited by 27
Peng, Y., Suryadi, J., Yang, Y., Kucukkal, T. G., Cao, W., & Alexov, E. G. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms161126022 · Cited by 26
Bairagya, H. R., Mukhopadhyay, B. P., & Sekar, K. (2009) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2009.10507265 · Cited by 26
Perdriel, J. L. (2012) · Cited by 26
Cardamone, F., Piva, A., Löser, E., Eichenberger, B., Romero-Mulero, M. C., Zenk, F. L., Shields, E. J., Cabezas‐Wallscheid, N., Bonasio, R., Tiana, G., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57719-4 · Cited by 28
Protein design in biological networks: from manipulating the input to modifying the output
van der Sloot, A. M., Kiel, C., Serrano, L. G., & Stricher, F. (2009) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzp032 · Cited by 25
Self-citationComputing the Pathogenicity of Alzheimer’s Disease Presenilin 1 Mutations
Tang, N., Dehury, B., & Kepp, K. P. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00896 · Cited by 23
Schaeffer, C., Izzi, C., Vettori, A., Pasqualetto, E., Cittaro, D., Lazarević, D., Caridi, G., Gnutti, B., Mazza, C., Jovine, L., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48014-6 · Cited by 25
Directed evolution of VanR biosensor specificity in yeast
D’Ambrosio, V., Pramanik, S., Goroncy, K., et al. (2020) · Biotechnology Notes · doi:10.1016/j.biotno.2020.01.002 · Cited by 25
Hadi‐Alijanvand, H., & Rouhani, M. (2020) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00348 · Cited by 24
Greisch, J., den Boer, M. A., Beurskens, F. J. M., Schuurman, J., Tamara, S., Bondt, A., & Heck, A. J. R. (2021) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1021/jasms.0c00461 · Cited by 25
Yıldız, Y., Yıldız, Y., Koşukçu, C., et al. (2021) · Clinical Genetics · doi:10.1111/cge.14002 · Cited by 25
Phenotypic spectrum and genetics of PAX2-related disorder in the Chinese cohort
Yang, X., Li, Y., Ye, F., et al. (2021) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12920-021-01102-x · Cited by 25
PyUUL provides an interface between biological structures and deep learning algorithms
Orlando, G., Raimondi, D., Duran‐Romaña, R., Moreau, Y., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., & Rousseau, F. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28327-3 · Cited by 27
Self-citationPSnpBind-ML: predicting the effect of binding site mutations on protein-ligand binding affinity
Ammar, A., Cavill, R., Evelo, C. T., & Willighagen, E. (2023) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-023-00701-3 · Cited by 25
Han, J., Kim, H. J., Lee, S., Hong, S. P., Park, K., Jeon, Y. H., Kim, D., Cheong, H., & Kim, H. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030929 · Cited by 25
Gene networks and liar paradoxes
Isalan, M. (2009) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.200900072 · Cited by 26
Protein structural robustness to mutations: an in silico investigation
Achoch, M., Dorantes-Gilardi, R., Wymant, C., Feverati, G., Salamatian, K., Vuillon, L., & Lesieur, C. (2015) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c5cp06091e · Cited by 25
Molina, M. L., Giudici, A. M., Poveda, J. A., Fernandez-Ballester, G. J., Montoya, E., Renart, M. L., Fernández-Carvajal, A. M., Encinar, J. A., Riquelme, G., Morales, A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.669598 · Cited by 25
Structural basis of activation of mammalian heme peroxidases
Singh, P. K., Iqbal, N., Sirohi, H. V., Bairagya, H. R., Kaur, P., Sharma, S. P., & Singh, T. P. (2017) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.11.003 · Cited by 25
Exploring the selective vulnerability in Alzheimer disease using tissue specific variant analysis
Dharshini, S. A. P., Taguchi, Y., & Gromiha, M. M. (2018) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.05.024 · Cited by 25
Duplication history and molecular evolution of the rbcS multigene family in angiosperms
Yamada, K., Davydov, I. I., Besnard, G., et al. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erz363 · Cited by 25
Exchange of water for sterol underlies sterol egress from a StARkin domain
Khelashvili, G., Pandey, K., Chauhan, N., Eliezer, D., & Menon, A. K. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.53444 · Cited by 23
Decoding the intricate network of molecular interactions of a hyperstable engineered biocatalyst
Marková, K., Chmelova, K., Marques, S. M., et al. (2020) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d0sc03367g · Cited by 25
Solubis: optimize your protein
Baets, G. D., Durme, J. V., van der Kant, R., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., & Rousseau, F. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv162 · Cited by 25
Self-citationDevelopment of scoring functions for antibody sequence assessment and optimization
Seeliger, D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076909 · Cited by 24
SIGMA leverages protein structural information to predict the pathogenicity of missense variants
Zhao, H., Du, H., Zhao, S., Chen, Z., Li, Y., Xu, K., Liu, B., Cheng, X., Wen, W., Li, G., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports Methods · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2023.100687 · Cited by 25
Protein stability models fail to capture epistatic interactions of double point mutations
Dieckhaus, H., & Kuhlman, B. A. (2024) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.70003 · Cited by 27
The mammalian complement system as an epitome of host–pathogen genetic conflicts
Cagliani, R., Forni, D., Filippi, G., Mozzi, A., GIOIA, L. D., Pontremoli, C., Pozzoli, U., Bresolin, N., Clerici, M., & Sironi, M. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13558 · Cited by 26
Mai, P., Zocher, G., Stehle, T., et al. (2018) · Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c8ob02037j · Cited by 24
Yang, J., Naik, N. M., Patel, J. S., Wylie, C. S., Gu, W., Huang, J., Ytreberg, F. M., Naik, M. T., Weinreich, D. M., & Rubenstein, B. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233509 · Cited by 24
Kulandaisamy, A., Zaucha, J. M., Frishman, D., & Gromiha, M. M. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2020.09.005 · Cited by 23
Seyama, R., Tsuchida, N., Okada, Y., Sakata, S., Hamada, K., Azuma, Y., Hamanaka, K., Fujita, A., Koshimizu, E., Miyatake, S., et al. (2021) · Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s10038-021-00986-y · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Schymkowitz, J., Borg, J., Stricher, F., Nys, R., Rousseau, F., & Serrano, L.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schymkowitz, J.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- Web Server
- Pages
- W382-W388
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- PMC
- PMC1160148
- OpenAlex
- W2023490488
- Semantic Scholar
- 18ceb01ed1614dfc42404e0e2d838443cc0a4731
- Cited by
- 2,759
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 222 · 2025: 298 · 2024: 254 · 2023: 264 · 2022: 215 · 2021: 227 · 2020: 223 · 2019: 181 · 2018: 150 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 96 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- FoldX, empirical force fields, protein stability, free energy calculation, protein folding, protein dynamics, nucleic acids, mutation effects, proton positions, water bridges, metal binding sites, complex formation, alanine scanning
- MeSH terms
- Mutation, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Molecular Structure, Protein Folding, Internet, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review