Cited by 25Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesProtein Structure and Dynamics

Development of scoring functions for antibody sequence assessment and optimization

Open access
Seeliger, Daniel·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Antibody development is still associated with substantial risks and difficulties as single mutations can radically change molecule properties like thermodynamic stability, solubility or viscosity. Since antibody generation methodologies cannot select and optimize for molecule properties which are important for biotechnological applications, careful sequence analysis and optimization is necessary to develop antibodies that fulfil the ambitious requirements of future drugs. While efforts to grab the physical principles of undesired molecule properties from the very bottom are becoming increasingly powerful, the wealth of publically available antibody sequences provides an alternative way to develop early assessment strategies for antibodies using a statistical approach which is the objective of this paper. Here, publically available sequences were used to develop heuristic potentials for the framework regions of heavy and light chains of antibodies of human and murine origin. The potentials take into account position dependent probabilities of individual amino acids but also conditional probabilities which are inevitable for sequence assessment and optimization. It is shown that the potentials derived from human sequences clearly distinguish between human sequences and sequences from mice and, hence, can be used as a measure of humaness which compares a given sequence with the phenotypic pool of human sequences instead of comparing sequence identities to germline genes. Following this line, it is demonstrated that, using the developed potentials, humanization of an antibody can be described as a simple mathematical optimization problem and that the in-silico generated framework variants closely resemble native sequences in terms of predicted immunogenicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0076909

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More sophisticated methods that take positional correlations between residues into account could be superior to Humanness score and HSC.

    “Humanness score and HSC are primarily sequence distance-based approaches and it has been demonstrated that more sophisticated methods that take the positional correlations between residues into account could be superior [187, 188].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Choulier L, Lafont V, Hugo N, Altschuh D (2000) Covariance analysis of protein families: The case of the variable domains of antibodies. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 41: 475– 484. 11056035
  2. [30]Martin AC (1996) Accessing the kabat antibody sequence database by computer. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 25: 130– 133. 8727325

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seeliger, D.
Affiliations
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Seeliger, Daniel
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-10-21
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
e76909
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974285609
Cited by
24
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
antibody optimization, scoring functions, heuristic potential, humanization, immunogenicity prediction, conditional probability, therapeutic antibodies
MeSH terms
Rituximab, Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Antibodies, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibody Specificity, Humans, Immunoglobulin Variable Region, Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains, Immunoglobulin Light Chains, Molecular Sequence Data, Sequence Analysis, Models, Immunological, Mice, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review