The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes
Open accessAbstract
The BioCyc database collection is a set of 160 pathway/genome databases (PGDBs) for most eukaryotic and prokaryotic species whose genomes have been completely sequenced to date. Each PGDB in the BioCyc collection describes the genome and predicted metabolic network of a single organism, inferred from the MetaCyc database, which is a reference source on metabolic pathways from multiple organisms. In addition, each bacterial PGDB includes predicted operons for the corresponding species. The BioCyc collection provides a unique resource for computational systems biology, namely global and comparative analyses of genomes and metabolic networks, and a supplement to the BioCyc resource of curated PGDBs. The Omics viewer available through the BioCyc website allows scientists to visualize combinations of gene expression, proteomics and metabolomics data on the metabolic maps of these organisms. This paper discusses the computational methodology by which the BioCyc collection has been expanded, and presents an aggregate analysis of the collection that includes the range of number of pathways present in these organisms, and the most frequently observed pathways. We seek scientists to adopt and curate individual PGDBs within the BioCyc collection. Only by harnessing the expertise of many scientists we can hope to produce biological databases, which accurately reflect the depth and breadth of knowledge that the biomedical research community is producing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Karp, P. D., Paley, S., & Romero, P. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.s225 · Cited by 661
Self-citation
Cited by
Metabolomics: beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms
Johnson, C. H., Ivanisevic, J., & Siuzdak, G. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.25 · Cited by 2,829
Genome Sequence of the Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum
The International Aphid Genomics Consortium (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000313 · Cited by 1,314
Geer, L. Y., Marchler-Bauer, A., Geer, R. C., Han, L., He, J., He, S., Liu, C., Shi, W., & Bryant, S. H. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp858 · Cited by 875
The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing
Demir, E., Cary, M. P., Paley, S., Fukuda, K., Lemer, C., Vastrik, I., Wu, G., D'Eustachio, P., Schaefer, C., Luciano, J., et al. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1666 · Cited by 745
Self-citationPANTHER Pathway: An Ontology-Based Pathway Database Coupled with Data Analysis Tools
Mi, H., & Thomas, P. (2009) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-175-2_7 · Cited by 744
Metadata
- Authors
- Karp, P. D.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-24
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 6083-6089
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2155331065
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gki892
- The paper
- Karp, P. D. (2005). Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki892
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.