The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BioCatalogue: a universal catalogue of web services for the life sciences
Open accessAbstract
The use of Web Services to enable programmatic access to on-line bioinformatics is becoming increasingly important in the Life Sciences. However, their number, distribution and the variable quality of their documentation can make their discovery and subsequent use difficult. A Web Services registry with information on available services will help to bring together service providers and their users. The BioCatalogue (http://www.biocatalogue.org/) provides a common interface for registering, browsing and annotating Web Services to the Life Science community. Services in the BioCatalogue can be described and searched in multiple ways based upon their technical types, bioinformatics categories, user tags, service providers or data inputs and outputs. They are also subject to constant monitoring, allowing the identification of service problems and changes and the filtering-out of unavailable or unreliable resources. The system is accessible via a human-readable 'Web 2.0'-style interface and a programmatic Web Service interface. The BioCatalogue follows a community approach in which all services can be registered, browsed and incrementally documented with annotations by any member of the scientific community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs
Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Furumichi, M., Tanabe, M., & Hirakawa, M. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp896 · Cited by 2,322
Cited by
UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis
Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Pettersen, E. F., Couch, G. S., Morris, J. H., & Ferrin, T. E. (2018) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3235 · Cited by 5,267
HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching
Finn, R. D., Clements, J., & Eddy, S. R. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr367 · Cited by 5,952
Venselaar, H., te Beek, T. A., Kuipers, R. K., Hekkelman, M. L., & Vriend, G. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-548 · Cited by 1,162
Expasy, the Swiss Bioinformatics Resource Portal, as designed by its users
Duvaud, S., Gabella, C., Lisacek, F., Stockinger, H., Ioannidis, V., & Durinx, C. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab225 · Cited by 991
Wolstencroft, K., Haines, R., Fellows, D., Williams, A., Withers, D., Owen, S., Soiland-Reyes, S., Dunlop, I., Nenadic, A., Fisher, P., et al. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt328 · Cited by 677
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhagat, J., Tanoh, F., Nzuobontane, E., Laurent, T., Orlowski, J., Roos, M., Wolstencroft, K., Aleksejevs, S., Stevens, R., Pettifer, S., Lopez, R., & Goble, C. A.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-05-19
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- Web Server
- Pages
- W689-W694
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2160943260
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 86.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BioCatalogue: a universal catalogue of web services for the life sciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkq394
- The paper
- Bhagat, J., Tanoh, F., Nzuobontane, E., Laurent, T., Orlowski, J., Roos, M., Wolstencroft, K., Aleksejevs, S., Stevens, R., Pettifer, S., Lopez, R., & Goble, C. A. (2010). BioCatalogue: a universal catalogue of web services for the life sciences. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq394
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
