The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gene Ontology Annotations and Resources
Open accessAbstract
The Gene Ontology (GO) Consortium (GOC, http://www.geneontology.org) is a community-based bioinformatics resource that classifies gene product function through the use of structured, controlled vocabularies. Over the past year, the GOC has implemented several processes to increase the quantity, quality and specificity of GO annotations. First, the number of manual, literature-based annotations has grown at an increasing rate. Second, as a result of a new 'phylogenetic annotation' process, manually reviewed, homology-based annotations are becoming available for a broad range of species. Third, the quality of GO annotations has been improved through a streamlined process for, and automated quality checks of, GO annotations deposited by different annotation groups. Fourth, the consistency and correctness of the ontology itself has increased by using automated reasoning tools. Finally, the GO has been expanded not only to cover new areas of biology through focused interaction with experts, but also to capture greater specificity in all areas of the ontology using tools for adding new combinatorial terms. The GOC works closely with other ontology developers to support integrated use of terminologies. The GOC supports its user community through the use of e-mail lists, social media and web-based resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology
Mungall, C. J., Torniai, C., Gkoutos, G. V., Lewis, S. E., & Haendel, M. A. (2012) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r5 · Cited by 732 · cited 1×
“In addition to this fully validated set of logical definitions, we have partially validated logical definitions that make use of terms from other ontologies, such as the Cell Ontology (10) the Plant Anatomy Ontology (11) and the Uberon multi-species metazoan anatomy ontology (12).”
Method
Cited by
Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward
The Gene Ontology Consortium (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1179 · Cited by 3,492
Self-citationPhosphorylation of innate immune adaptor proteins MAVS, STING, and TRIF induces IRF3 activation
Liu, S., Cai, X., Wu, J., Cong, Q., Chen, X., Li, T., Du, F., Ren, J., Wu, Y.-T., Grishin, N. V., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2630 · Cited by 1,927
MycoCosm portal: gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes
Grigoriev, I. V., Nikitin, R., Haridas, S., Kuo, A., Ohm, R., Otillar, R., Riley, R., Salamov, A., Zhao, X., Korzeniewski, F., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1183 · Cited by 1,498
CottonGen: a genomics, genetics and breeding database for cotton research
Yu, J., Jung, S., Cheng, C.-H., Ficklin, S. P., Lee, T., Zheng, P., Jones, D., Percy, R. G., & Main, D. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1064 · Cited by 349
Inglis, D. O., Binkley, J., Skrzypek, M. S., Arnaud, M. B., Cerqueira, G. C., Shah, P., Wymore, F., Wortman, J. R., & Sherlock, G. (2013) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-13-91 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- The Gene Ontology Consortium
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-11-17
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D530-D535
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W1566952502
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene Ontology Annotations and Resources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gks1050
- The paper
- The Gene Ontology Consortium. (2012). Gene Ontology Annotations and Resources. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.