Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 571

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties in 2013

Open access
Haft, Daniel H., Selengut, Jeremy D., Richter, Roland A., Harkins, Derek, Basu, Malay K., Beck, Erin·2012·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

TIGRFAMs, available online at http://www.jcvi.org/tigrfams is a database of protein family definitions. Each entry features a seed alignment of trusted representative sequences, a hidden Markov model (HMM) built from that alignment, cutoff scores that let automated annotation pipelines decide which proteins are members, and annotations for transfer onto member proteins. Most TIGRFAMs models are designated equivalog, meaning they assign a specific name to proteins conserved in function from a common ancestral sequence. Models describing more functionally heterogeneous families are designated subfamily or domain, and assign less specific but more widely applicable annotations. The Genome Properties database, available at http://www.jcvi.org/genome-properties, specifies how computed evidence, including TIGRFAMs HMM results, should be used to judge whether an enzymatic pathway, a protein complex or another type of molecular subsystem is encoded in a genome. TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties content are developed in concert because subsystems reconstruction for large numbers of genomes guides selection of seed alignment sequences and cutoff values during protein family construction. Both databases specialize heavily in bacterial and archaeal subsystems. At present, 4284 models appear in TIGRFAMs, while 628 systems are described by Genome Properties. Content derives both from subsystem discovery work and from biocuration of the scientific literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gks1234

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Madupu, 2012, CharProtDB: a database of experimentally characterized protein annotations, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D237, 10.1093/nar/gkr1133 · DOI
  2. Eddy, 2009, A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference, Genome Inform., 23, 205
  3. Haft, 2003, The TIGRFAMs database of protein families, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 371, 10.1093/nar/gkg128 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Punta, 2012, The Pfam protein families database, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D290, 10.1093/nar/gkr1065 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Selengut, 2007, TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties: tools for the assignment of molecular function and biological process in prokaryotic genomes, Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D260, 10.1093/nar/gkl1043 · DOI
  6. Finn, 2011, HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching, Nucleic Acids Res., 39, W29, 10.1093/nar/gkr367 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hunter, 2012, InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D306, 10.1093/nar/gkr948 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Marchler-Bauer, 2011, CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins, Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D225, 10.1093/nar/gkq1189 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Peterson, 2001, The Comprehensive Microbial Resource, Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 123, 10.1093/nar/29.1.123 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Davidsen, 2010, The comprehensive microbial resource, Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D340, 10.1093/nar/gkp912 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Krentz, 2010, A comparison of methanobactins from Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b and Methylocystis strain Sb2 predicts methanobactins are synthesized from diverse peptide precursors modified to create a common core for binding and reducing copper ions, Biochemistry, 49, 10117, 10.1021/bi1014375 · DOI
  12. Haft, 2005, Genome Properties: a system for the investigation of prokaryotic genetic content for microbiology, genome annotation and comparative genomics, Bioinformatics, 21, 293, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti015 · DOI
  13. Overbeek, 2005, The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 5691, 10.1093/nar/gki866 · DOI
  14. Sofia, 2001, Radical SAM, a novel protein superfamily linking unresolved steps in familiar biosynthetic pathways with radical mechanisms: functional characterization using new analysis and information visualization methods, Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 1097, 10.1093/nar/29.5.1097 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ohsawa, 1989, Cloning of the biotin synthetase gene from Bacillus sphaericus and expression in Escherichia coli and Bacilli, Gene, 80, 39, 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90248-5 · DOI
  16. Schnoes, 2009, Annotation error in public databases: misannotation of molecular function in enzyme superfamilies, PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000605, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000605 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kenney, 2012, Chemistry and biology of the copper chelator methanobactin, ACS Chem. Biol., 7, 260, 10.1021/cb2003913 · DOI
  18. Haft, 2008, Orphan SelD proteins and selenium-dependent molybdenum hydroxylases, Biol. Direct, 3, 4, 10.1186/1745-6150-3-4 · DOI
  19. Pellegrini, 1999, Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 4285, 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4285 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Basu, 2011, ProPhylo: partial phylogenetic profiling to guide protein family construction and assignment of biological process, BMC Bioinform., 12, 434, 10.1186/1471-2105-12-434 · DOI
  21. Haft, 2011, GlyGly-CTERM and rhombosortase: a C-terminal protein processing signal in a many-to-one pairing with a rhomboid family intramembrane serine protease, PLoS One, 6, e28886, 10.1371/journal.pone.0028886 · DOI
  22. Pathak, 2012, Cell contact-dependent outer membrane exchange in myxobacteria: genetic determinants and mechanism, PLoS Genet., 8, e1002626, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002626 · DOI
  23. Haft, 2012, Archaeosortases and exosortases are widely distributed systems linking membrane transit with posttranslational modification, J. Bacteriol., 194, 36, 10.1128/JB.06026-11 · DOI
  24. Haft, 2005, A guild of 45 CRISPR-associated (Cas) protein families and multiple CRISPR/Cas subtypes exist in prokaryotic genomes, PLoS Comput. Biol., 1, e60, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010060 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Makarova, 2011, Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 9, 467, 10.1038/nrmicro2577 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Haft, 2011, Biological systems discovery in silico: radical S-adenosylmethionine protein families and their target peptides for posttranslational modification, J. Bacteriol., 193, 2745, 10.1128/JB.00040-11 · DOI

Cited by

See all 571

Metadata

Authors
Haft, D. H., Selengut, J. D., Richter, R. A., Harkins, D., Basu, M. K., & Beck, E.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2012-11-28
Volume
41
Issue
D1
Pages
D387-D395
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W1976325156
Cited by
571
References
0
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties in 2013. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gks1234
The paper
Haft, D. H., Selengut, J. D., Richter, R. A., Harkins, D., Basu, M. K., & Beck, E. (2012). TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties in 2013. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1234

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.