The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
InParanoid 8: orthology analysis between 273 proteomes, mostly eukaryotic
Open accessAbstract
The InParanoid database (http://InParanoid.sbc.su.se) provides a user interface to orthologs inferred by the InParanoid algorithm. As there are now international efforts to curate and standardize complete proteomes, we have switched to using these resources rather than gathering and curating the proteomes ourselves. InParanoid release 8 is based on the 66 reference proteomes that the 'Quest for Orthologs' community has agreed on using, plus 207 additional proteomes from the UniProt complete proteomes--in total 273 species. These represent 246 eukaryotes, 20 bacteria and seven archaea. Compared to the previous release, this increases the number of species by 173% and the number of pairwise species comparisons by 650%. In turn, the number of ortholog groups has increased by 423%. We present the contents and usages of InParanoid 8, and a detailed analysis of how the proteome content has changed since the previous release.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Pfam: the protein families database
Finn, R. D., Bateman, A., Clements, J., Coggill, P., Eberhardt, R. Y., Eddy, S. R., Heger, A., Hetherington, K., Holm, L., Mistry, J., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1223 · Cited by 6,148
Self-citationActivities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt)
(2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1140 · Cited by 1,735
Distinguishing Homologous from Analogous Proteins
Fitch, W. M. (1970) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2412448 · Cited by 1,503
Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons
Remm, M., Storm, C. E. V., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.5197 · Cited by 1,174
Self-citationUpdate on activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2013
The UniProt Consortium (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1068 · Cited by 672
InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis
Ostlund, G., Schmitt, T., Forslund, K., Kostler, T., Messina, D. N., Roopra, S., Frings, O., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp931 · Cited by 623
Self-citationPhylogenetic and Functional Assessment of Orthologs Inference Projects and Methods
Altenhoff, A. M., & Dessimoz, C. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000262 · Cited by 420
Assessing Performance of Orthology Detection Strategies Applied to Eukaryotic Genomes
Chen, F., Mackey, A. J., Vermunt, J. K., & Roos, D. S. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000383 · Cited by 382
Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes
Sonnhammer, E. L. L., & Koonin, E. V. (2002) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(02)02793-2 · Cited by 379
Self-citation
Cited by
Huerta-Cepas, J., Szklarczyk, D., Heller, D., Hernández-Plaza, A., Forslund, S. K., Cook, H., Mende, D. R., Letunic, I., Rattei, T., Jensen, L. J., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1085 · Cited by 4,902
A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets
Santos, R., Ursu, O., Gaulton, A., Bento, A. P., Donadi, R. S., Bologa, C. G., Karlsson, A., Al-Lazikani, B., Hersey, A., Oprea, T. I., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.230 · Cited by 2,427
Huerta-Cepas, J., Szklarczyk, D., Forslund, K., Cook, H., Heller, D., Walter, M. C., Rattei, T., Mende, D. R., Sunagawa, S., Kuhn, M., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1248 · Cited by 2,101
A brave new world of RNA-binding proteins
Hentze, M. W., Castello, A., Schwarzl, T., & Preiss, T. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.130 · Cited by 1,821
Kriventseva, E. V., Kuznetsov, D., Tegenfeldt, F., Manni, M., Dias, R., Simão, F. A., & Zdobnov, E. M. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1053 · Cited by 1,232
Metadata
- Authors
- Sonnhammer, E. L. L., & Östlund, G.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-11-27
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D234-D239
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2030530458
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: InParanoid 8: orthology analysis between 273 proteomes, mostly eukaryotic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gku1203
- The paper
- Sonnhammer, E. L. L., & Östlund, G. (2015). InParanoid 8: orthology analysis between 273 proteomes, mostly eukaryotic. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
