The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools
Open accessAbstract
The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database is one of the world-leading data repositories of mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics data. Since the beginning of 2014, PRIDE Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/) is the new PRIDE archival system, replacing the original PRIDE database. Here we summarize the developments in PRIDE resources and related tools since the previous update manuscript in the Database Issue in 2013. PRIDE Archive constitutes a complete redevelopment of the original PRIDE, comprising a new storage backend, data submission system and web interface, among other components. PRIDE Archive supports the most-widely used PSI (Proteomics Standards Initiative) data standard formats (mzML and mzIdentML) and implements the data requirements and guidelines of the ProteomeXchange Consortium. The wide adoption of ProteomeXchange within the community has triggered an unprecedented increase in the number of submitted data sets (around 150 data sets per month). We outline some statistics on the current PRIDE Archive data contents. We also report on the status of the PRIDE related stand-alone tools: PRIDE Inspector, PRIDE Converter 2 and the ProteomeXchange submission tool. Finally, we will give a brief update on the resources under development 'PRIDE Cluster' and 'PRIDE Proteomes', which provide a complementary view and quality-scored information of the peptide and protein identification data available in PRIDE Archive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1511 · Cited by 14,855
A draft map of the human proteome
Kim, M.-S., Pinto, S. M., Getnet, D., Nirujogi, R. S., Manda, S. S., Chaerkady, R., Madugundu, A. K., Kelkar, D. S., Isserlin, R., Jain, S., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13302 · Cited by 2,198
Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome
Wilhelm, M., Schlegl, J., Hahne, H., Gholami, A. M., Lieberenz, M., Savitski, M. M., Ziegler, E., Butzmann, L., Gessulat, S., Marx, H., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13319 · Cited by 1,820
MS-GF+ makes progress towards a universal database search tool for proteomics
Kim, S., & Pevzner, P. A. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6277 · Cited by 1,098
Widespread Proteome Remodeling and Aggregation in Aging C. elegans
Walther, D. M., Kasturi, P., Zheng, M., Pinkert, S., Vecchi, G., Ciryam, P., Morimoto, R. I., Dobson, C. M., Vendruscolo, M., Mann, M., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.032 · Cited by 569
Deutsch, E. W., Mendoza, L., Shteynberg, D., Slagel, J., Sun, Z., & Moritz, R. L. (2015) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.201400164 · Cited by 342
Analysis of High Accuracy, Quantitative Proteomics Data in the MaxQB Database
Schaab, C., Geiger, T., Stoehr, G., Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.014068 · Cited by 164
Cited by
UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase
The UniProt Consortium (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1099 · Cited by 4,436
Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases
Lloyd-Price, J., Arze, C., Ananthakrishnan, A. N., Schirmer, M., Avila-Pacheco, J., Poon, T. W., Andrews, E., Ajami, N. J., Bonham, K. S., Brislawn, C. J., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1237-9 · Cited by 3,143
NAD + repletion improves mitochondrial and stem cell function and enhances life span in mice
Zhang, H., Ryu, D., Wu, Y., Gariani, K., Wang, X., Luan, P., D’Amico, D., Ropelle, E. R., Lutolf, M. P., Aebersold, R., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf2693 · Cited by 1,255
Meier, F., Brunner, A.-D., Koch, S., Koch, H., Lubeck, M., Krause, M., Goedecke, N., Decker, J., Kosinski, T., Park, M. A., et al. (2018) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.tir118.000900 · Cited by 965
The Cellosaurus, a Cell-Line Knowledge Resource
Bairoch, A. (2018) · Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT · doi:10.7171/jbt.18-2902-002 · Cited by 807
Metadata
- Authors
- Vizcaíno, J. A., Csordas, A., del-Toro, N., Dianes, J. A., Griss, J., Lavidas, I., Mayer, G., Perez-Riverol, Y., Reisinger, F., Ternent, T., Xu, Q.-W., Wang, R., & Hermjakob, H.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-11-02
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D447-D456
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2135581618
- Cited by
- 3,451
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 233.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkv1145
- The paper
- Vizcaíno, J. A., Csordas, A., del-Toro, N., Dianes, J. A., Griss, J., Lavidas, I., Mayer, G., Perez-Riverol, Y., Reisinger, F., Ternent, T., Xu, Q.-W., Wang, R., & Hermjakob, H. (2016). 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
