Cited by 342Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Trans‐Proteomic Pipeline, a standardized data processing pipeline for large‐scale reproducible proteomics informatics

Open access
Deutsch, Eric W., Mendoza, Luis, Shteynberg, David, Slagel, Joseph, Sun, Zhi, Moritz, Robert L.·2015·PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications

Abstract

Democratization of genomics technologies has enabled the rapid determination of genotypes. More recently the democratization of comprehensive proteomics technologies is enabling the determination of the cellular phenotype and the molecular events that define its dynamic state. Core proteomic technologies include MS to define protein sequence, protein:protein interactions, and protein PTMs. Key enabling technologies for proteomics are bioinformatic pipelines to identify, quantitate, and summarize these events. The Trans‐Proteomics Pipeline (TPP) is a robust open‐source standardized data processing pipeline for large‐scale reproducible quantitative MS proteomics. It supports all major operating systems and instrument vendors via open data formats. Here, we provide a review of the overall proteomics workflow supported by the TPP, its major tools, and how it can be used in its various modes from desktop to cloud computing. We describe new features for the TPP, including data visualization functionality. We conclude by describing some common perils that affect the analysis of MS/MS datasets, as well as some major upcoming features.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prca.201400164

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The HPP routinely applies high-stringency protein inference analytics generated through the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline.

    “The HPP routinely applies high-stringency protein inference analytics10, generated through the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline11.”

    From A high-stringency blueprint of the human proteome (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deutsch, E. W., Mendoza, L., Shteynberg, D., Slagel, J., Sun, Z., & Moritz, R. L.
Affiliations
Institute for Systems Biology (US)
Corresponding author
Deutsch, Eric W.
Venue
PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-02
Volume
9
Issue
7-8
Pages
745-754
ISSN
  • 1862-8346 (ISSN-L)
  • 1862-8354
OpenAlex
W2091377998
Cited by
342
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS - CLINICAL APPLICATIONS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health from the NHGRI (RC2 HG005805)
  • NIGMS (R01 GM087221 and 2P50 GM076547)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U54EB020406)
  • National Science Foundation MRI (0923536)
  • ProteomeXchange” (260558)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
open source software, proteomics workflow, data visualization, cloud computing
MeSH terms
Humans, Software, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Computational Biology, Proteome, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review