The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate read-based metagenome characterization using a hierarchical suite of unique signatures
Open accessAbstract
A major challenge in the field of shotgun metagenomics is the accurate identification of organisms present within a microbial community, based on classification of short sequence reads. Though existing microbial community profiling methods have attempted to rapidly classify the millions of reads output from modern sequencers, the combination of incomplete databases, similarity among otherwise divergent genomes, errors and biases in sequencing technologies, and the large volumes of sequencing data required for metagenome sequencing has led to unacceptably high false discovery rates (FDR). Here, we present the application of a novel, gene-independent and signature-based metagenomic taxonomic profiling method with significantly and consistently smaller FDR than any other available method. Our algorithm circumvents false positives using a series of non-redundant signature databases and examines Genomic Origins Through Taxonomic CHAllenge (GOTTCHA). GOTTCHA was tested and validated on 20 synthetic and mock datasets ranging in community composition and complexity, was applied successfully to data generated from spiked environmental and clinical samples, and robustly demonstrates superior performance compared with other available tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k -mers
Marçais, G., & Kingsford, C. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011 · Cited by 4,661
A framework for human microbiome research
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11209 · Cited by 2,650
Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes
Segata, N., Waldron, L., Ballarini, A., Narasimhan, V., Jousson, O., & Huttenhower, C. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2066 · Cited by 1,776
Cited by
Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification
Ye, S. H., Siddle, K. J., Park, D. J., & Sabeti, P. C. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.010 · Cited by 593
Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis
Bharti, R., & Grimm, D. G. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz155 · Cited by 592
A review of methods and databases for metagenomic classification and assembly
Breitwieser, F. P., Lu, J., & Salzberg, S. L. (2019) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx120 · Cited by 566
KrakenUniq: confident and fast metagenomics classification using unique k-mer counts
Breitwieser, F. P., Baker, D. N., & Salzberg, S. L. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1568-0 · Cited by 474
Metagenome-wide association studies: fine-mining the microbiome
Wang, J., & Jia, H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.83 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Freitas, T. A. K., Li, P.-E., Scholz, M. B., & Chain, P. S. G.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-03-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e69-e69
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2000040814
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate read-based metagenome characterization using a hierarchical suite of unique signatures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkv180
- The paper
- Freitas, T. A. K., Li, P.-E., Scholz, M. B., & Chain, P. S. G. (2015). Accurate read-based metagenome characterization using a hierarchical suite of unique signatures. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.