Cited by 1,776Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes

Open access
Segata, Nicola, Waldron, Levi, Ballarini, Annalisa, Narasimhan, Vagheesh, Jousson, Olivier, Huttenhower, Curtis·2012·Nature Methods

Abstract

Metagenomic shotgun sequencing data can identify microbes populating a microbial community and their proportions, but existing taxonomic profiling methods are inefficient for increasingly large data sets. We present an approach that uses clade-specific marker genes to unambiguously assign reads to microbial clades more accurately and >50× faster than current approaches. We validated our metagenomic phylogenetic analysis tool, MetaPhlAn, on terabases of short reads and provide the largest metagenomic profiling to date of the human gut. It can be accessed at http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/metaphlan/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.2066

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Segata, N., Waldron, L., Ballarini, A., Narasimhan, V., Jousson, O., & Huttenhower, C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Trento (IT)
Corresponding author
Huttenhower, Curtis
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2012-06-10
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
811-814
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2131026689
Cited by
1,776
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 209 · 2021: 224 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 144 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 10
FWCI
33.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG005969)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
MetaPhlAn, microbial community analysis, taxonomic profiling, shotgun sequencing, human gut microbiome, microbial identification
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Genetic Markers, Humans, Phylogeny, Reproducibility of Results, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review