Cited by 429Gut microbiota and healthGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Metagenome-wide association studies: fine-mining the microbiome

Wang, Jun, Jia, Huijue·2016·Nature Reviews Microbiology

Abstract

Metagenome-wide association studies (MWAS) have enabled the high-resolution investigation of associations between the human microbiome and several complex diseases, including type 2 diabetes, obesity, liver cirrhosis, colorectal cancer and rheumatoid arthritis. The associations that can be identified by MWAS are not limited to the identification of taxa that are more or less abundant, as is the case with taxonomic approaches, but additionally include the identification of microbial functions that are enriched or depleted. In this Review, we summarize recent findings from MWAS and discuss how these findings might inform the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of human disease in the future. Furthermore, we highlight the need to better characterize the biology of many of the bacteria that are found in the human microbiota as an essential step in understanding how bacterial strains that have been identified by MWAS are associated with disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.83

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gut microbiome of liver cirrhosis, colorectal cancer, RA, and ACVD patients have all showed an increase in the abundance of oral bacteria.

    “Although the gut microbiome of liver cirrhosis, colorectal cancer, RA, and ACVD patients have all showed an increase in the abundance of oral bacteria3, the set of oral bacterial species were, however, observed to differ, and only RA and ACVD have been epidemiologically associated with periodontitis.”
  • All 1250 samples were analyzed in the same manner, eliminating technical biases in MWAS between studies.

    “All 1250 samples were analyzed in the same manner, eliminating technical biases in MWAS between studies3.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., & Jia, H.
Affiliations
BGI Group (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Jun
  • Jia, Huijue
Venue
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
508-522
ISSN
  • 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1534
OpenAlex
W2463312000
Cited by
429
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 6
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Shenzhen Government
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
metagenome-wide association study, human microbiome, type 2 diabetes, obesity, liver cirrhosis, colorectal cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, microbial function
MeSH terms
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Bacteria, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Obesity, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, ROC Curve, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metagenome, Genome-Wide Association Study, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review