The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
antiSMASH 3.0—a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters
Open accessAbstract
Microbial secondary metabolism constitutes a rich source of antibiotics, chemotherapeutics, insecticides and other high-value chemicals. Genome mining of gene clusters that encode the biosynthetic pathways for these metabolites has become a key methodology for novel compound discovery. In 2011, we introduced antiSMASH, a web server and stand-alone tool for the automatic genomic identification and analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters, available at http://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org. Here, we present version 3.0 of antiSMASH, which has undergone major improvements. A full integration of the recently published ClusterFinder algorithm now allows using this probabilistic algorithm to detect putative gene clusters of unknown types. Also, a new dereplication variant of the ClusterBlast module now identifies similarities of identified clusters to any of 1172 clusters with known end products. At the enzyme level, active sites of key biosynthetic enzymes are now pinpointed through a curated pattern-matching procedure and Enzyme Commission numbers are assigned to functionally classify all enzyme-coding genes. Additionally, chemical structure prediction has been improved by incorporating polyketide reduction states. Finally, in order for users to be able to organize and analyze multiple antiSMASH outputs in a private setting, a new XML output module allows offline editing of antiSMASH annotations within the Geneious software.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BLAST+: architecture and applications
Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., & Madden, T. L. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · Cited by 22,074
Biopython: freely available python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics
Cock, P. J. A., Antao, T., Chang, J. T., Chapman, B. A., Cox, C. J., Dalke, A., Friedberg, I., Hamelryck, T., Kauff, F., Wilczynski, B., et al. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · Cited by 6,080
Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years
Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2007) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np068054v · Cited by 5,517
Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010
Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2012) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np200906s · Cited by 4,687
Constraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods
Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H., & Palsson, B. O. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2737 · Cited by 779
Cited by
Human commensals producing a novel antibiotic impair pathogen colonization
Zipperer, A., Konnerth, M. C., Laux, C., Berscheid, A., Janek, D., Weidenmaier, C., Burian, M., Schilling, N. A., Slavetinsky, C., Marschal, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18634 · Cited by 938
Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster
Medema, M. H., Kottmann, R., Yilmaz, P., Cummings, M., Biggins, J. B., Blin, K., de Bruijn, I., Chooi, Y. H., Claesen, J., Coates, R. C., et al. (2015) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1890 · Cited by 873
Self-citationUS immigration westernizes the human gut microbiome
Vangay, P., Johnson, A. J., Ward, T. L., Al-Ghalith, G. A., Shields-Cutler, R. R., Hillmann, B. M., Lucas, S. K., Beura, L. K., Thompson, E. A., Till, L. M., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.029 · Cited by 794
The evolution of genome mining in microbes – a review
Ziemert, N., Alanjary, M., & Weber, T. (2016) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/c6np00025h · Cited by 688
Self-citationCultivation and sequencing of rumen microbiome members from the Hungate1000 Collection
Hungate1000 project collaborators, Seshadri, R., Leahy, S. C., Attwood, G. T., Teh, K. H., Lambie, S. C., Cookson, A. L., Eloe-Fadrosh, E. A., Pavlopoulos, G. A., Hadjithomas, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4110 · Cited by 624
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, T., Blin, K., Duddela, S., Krug, D., Kim, H. U., Bruccoleri, R., Lee, S. Y., Fischbach, M. A., Müller, R., Wohlleben, W., Breitling, R., Takano, E., & Medema, M. H.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-05-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- W1
- Pages
- W237-W243
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W1908709110
- Cited by
- 1,868
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 208.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: antiSMASH 3.0—a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkv437
- The paper
- Weber, T., Blin, K., Duddela, S., Krug, D., Kim, H. U., Bruccoleri, R., Lee, S. Y., Fischbach, M. A., Müller, R., Wohlleben, W., Breitling, R., Takano, E., & Medema, M. H. (2015). antiSMASH 3.0—a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
