Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 688

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 192 of the 192 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The evolution of genome mining in microbes – a review

Open access
Ziemert, Nadine, Alanjary, Mohammad, Weber, Tilmann·2016·Natural Product Reports

Abstract

This article reviews the development of genome mining strategies in bacteria during the last decade.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6np00025h

Cites

192 of 192 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 192 references

Cited by

See all 688

Metadata

Authors
Ziemert, N., Alanjary, M., & Weber, T.
Venue
Natural Product Reports
Published
2016
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
988-1005
ISSN
  • 0265-0568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4752
OpenAlex
W2410975458
Cited by
688
References
192
FWCI
45.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of genome mining in microbes – a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c6np00025h
The paper
Ziemert, N., Alanjary, M., & Weber, T. (2016). The evolution of genome mining in microbes – a review. Natural Product Reports. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6np00025h

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.