The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SUBA4: the interactive data analysis centre for Arabidopsis subcellular protein locations
Open accessAbstract
The SUBcellular location database for Arabidopsis proteins (SUBA4, http://suba.live) is a comprehensive collection of manually curated published data sets of large-scale subcellular proteomics, fluorescent protein visualization, protein-protein interaction (PPI) as well as subcellular targeting calls from 22 prediction programs. SUBA4 contains an additional 35 568 localizations totalling more than 60 000 experimental protein location claims as well as 37 new suborganellar localization categories. The experimental PPI data has been expanded to 26 327 PPI pairs including 856 PPI localizations from experimental fluorescent visualizations. The new SUBA4 user interface enables users to choose quickly from the filter categories: 'subcellular location', 'protein properties', 'protein-protein interaction' and 'affiliations' to build complex queries. This allows substantial expansion of search parameters into 80 annotation types comprising 1 150 204 new annotations to study metadata associated with subcellular localization. The 'BLAST' tab contains a sequence alignment tool to enable a sequence fragment from any species to find the closest match in Arabidopsis and retrieve data on subcellular location. Using the location consensus SUBAcon, the SUBA4 toolbox delivers three novel data services allowing interactive analysis of user data to provide relative compartmental protein abundances and proximity relationship analysis of PPI and coexpression partners from a submitted list of Arabidopsis gene identifiers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BLAST+: architecture and applications
Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., & Madden, T. L. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · Cited by 22,074
Arnold, A., & Nikoloski, Z. (2014) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.235358 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Heinemann, B., Künzler, P., Eubel, H., Braun, H.-P., & Hildebrandt, T. M. (2020) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiaa050 · Cited by 87
Gutierrez‐Beltran, E., Elander, P. H., Dalman, K., Dayhoff, G. W., Moschou, P. N., Uversky, V. N., Crespo, J. L., & Bozhkov, P. V. (2021) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2020105043 · Cited by 83
Li, S., Wu, S., Wang, L., Li, F., Jiang, H., & Bai, F. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102344 · Cited by 42
Barbosa, I. C. R., De Bellis, D., Flückiger, I., Bellani, E., Grangé-Guerment, M., Hématy, K., & Geldner, N. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37265-7 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Hooper, C. M., Castleden, I. R., Tanz, S. K., Aryamanesh, N., & Millar, A. H.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-11-28
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D1064-D1074
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2557794320
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
