The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing
Open accessAbstract
Allele-specific copy number analysis (ASCN) from next generation sequencing (NGS) data can greatly extend the utility of NGS beyond the identification of mutations to precisely annotate the genome for the detection of homozygous/heterozygous deletions, copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH), allele-specific gains/amplifications. In addition, as targeted gene panels are increasingly used in clinical sequencing studies for the detection of 'actionable' mutations and copy number alterations to guide treatment decisions, accurate, tumor purity-, ploidy- and clonal heterogeneity-adjusted integer copy number calls are greatly needed to more reliably interpret NGS-based cancer gene copy number data in the context of clinical sequencing. We developed FACETS, an ASCN tool and open-source software with a broad application to whole genome, whole-exome, as well as targeted panel sequencing platforms. It is a fully integrated stand-alone pipeline that includes sequencing BAM file post-processing, joint segmentation of total- and allele-specific read counts, and integer copy number calls corrected for tumor purity, ploidy and clonal heterogeneity, with comprehensive output and integrated visualization. We demonstrate the application of FACETS using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) whole-exome sequencing of lung adenocarcinoma samples. We also demonstrate its application to a clinical sequencing platform based on a targeted gene panel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of read-mapping biases on detecting allele-specific expression from RNA-sequencing data.
Degner, J. F., Marioni, J. C., Pai, A. A., Pickrell, J. K., Nkadori, E., Gilad, Y., & Pritchard, J. K. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp579 · Cited by 502
Cited by
Clonal heterogeneity and tumor evolution: past, present, and the future
McGranahan, N., & Swanton, C. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.018 · Cited by 2,840
Tumor and Microenvironment Evolution during Immunotherapy with Nivolumab
Riaz, N., Havel, J. J., Makarov, V., Desrichard, A., Urba, W. J., Sims, J. S., Hodi, F. S., Martín-Algarra, S., Mandal, R., Sharfman, W. H., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.028 · Cited by 2,401
Genomic correlates of clinical outcome in advanced prostate cancer
Abida, W., Cyrta, J., Heller, G., Prandi, D., Armenia, J., Coleman, I., Cieslik, M., Benelli, M., Robinson, D., Van Allen, E. M., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1902651116 · Cited by 1,372
Allele-Specific HLA Loss and Immune Escape in Lung Cancer Evolution
McGranahan, N., Rosenthal, R., Hiley, C. T., Rowan, A. J., Watkins, T. B. K., Wilson, G. A., Birkbak, N. J., Veeriah, S., Van Loo, P., Herrero, J., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.001 · Cited by 1,298
Patient HLA class I genotype influences cancer response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy
Chowell, D., Morris, L. G. T., Grigg, C. M., Weber, J. K., Samstein, R. M., Makarov, V., Kuo, F., Kendall, S. M., Requena, D., Riaz, N., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao4572 · Cited by 1,142
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, R., & Seshan, V. E.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-06-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- e131-e131
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2405513305
- Cited by
- 1,258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.