Cited by 1,372Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchChromatin Remodeling and CancerCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Genomic correlates of clinical outcome in advanced prostate cancer

Open access
Abida, Wassim, Cyrta, Joanna, Heller, Glenn, Prandi, Davide, Armenia, Joshua, Coleman, Ilsa, Cieslik, Marcin, Benelli, Matteo +35 more·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Heterogeneity in the genomic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer has become apparent through several comprehensive profiling efforts, but little is known about the impact of this heterogeneity on clinical outcome. Here, we report comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analysis of 429 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) linked with longitudinal clinical outcomes, integrating findings from whole-exome, transcriptome, and histologic analysis. For 128 patients treated with a first-line next-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI; abiraterone or enzalutamide), we examined the association of 18 recurrent DNA- and RNA-based genomic alterations, including androgen receptor ( AR ) variant expression, AR transcriptional output, and neuroendocrine expression signatures, with clinical outcomes. Of these, only RB1 alteration was significantly associated with poor survival, whereas alterations in RB1 , AR , and TP53 were associated with shorter time on treatment with an ARSI. This large analysis integrating mCRPC genomics with histology and clinical outcomes identifies RB1 genomic alteration as a potent predictor of poor outcome, and is a community resource for further interrogation of clinical and molecular associations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1902651116

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abida, W., Cyrta, J., Heller, G., Prandi, D., Armenia, J., Coleman, I., Cieslik, M., Benelli, M., Robinson, D., Van Allen, E. M., Sboner, A., Fedrizzi, T., Mosquera, J. M., Robinson, B. D., De Sarkar, N., Kunju, L. P., Tomlins, S., Wu, Y. M., Nava Rodrigues, D., Loda, M., Gopalan, A., Reuter, V. E., Pritchard, C. C., Mateo, J., Bianchini, D., Miranda, S., Carreira, S., Rescigno, P., Filipenko, J., Vinson, J., Montgomery, R. B., Beltran, H., Heath, E. I., Scher, H. I., Kantoff, P. W., Taplin, M.-E., Schultz, N., deBono, J. S., Demichelis, F., Nelson, P. S., Rubin, M. A., Chinnaiyan, A. M., & Sawyers, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215;
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109;
  • Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, United Kingdom;
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (US)
  • Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium, New York, NY 10065;
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Nelson, Peter S.
  • Rubin, Mark A.
  • Chinnaiyan, Arul M.
  • Sawyers, Charles L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-05-06
Volume
116
Issue
23
Pages
11428-11436
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2944403040
Cited by
1,372
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 144 · 2025: 199 · 2024: 207 · 2023: 238 · 2022: 185 · 2021: 219 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 1
FWCI
107.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation (SU2C-AACR-DT0712)
  • EIF | Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C-AACR-DT0712)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (none)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, RB1 alterations, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, abiraterone, enzalutamide, TP53, neuroendocrine prostate cancer, prognostic factors, time on treatment, survival, tumor genomic heterogeneity, gene expression profiling
MeSH terms
Aged, Androstenes, Benzamides, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nitriles, Phenylthiohydantoin, Receptors, Androgen, Biomarkers, Tumor, Treatment Outcome, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Genomics, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review