The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prokaryotic Virus Orthologous Groups (pVOGs): a resource for comparative genomics and protein family annotation
Open accessAbstract
Viruses are the most abundant and diverse biological entities on earth, and while most of this diversity remains completely unexplored, advances in genome sequencing have provided unprecedented glimpses into the virosphere. The Prokaryotic Virus Orthologous Groups (pVOGs, formerly called Phage Orthologous Groups, POGs) resource has aided in this task over the past decade by using automated methods to keep pace with the rapid increase in genomic data. The uses of pVOGs include functional annotation of viral proteins, identification of genes and viruses in uncharacterized DNA samples, phylogenetic analysis, large-scale comparative genomics projects, and more. The pVOGs database represents a comprehensive set of orthologous gene families shared across multiple complete genomes of viruses that infect bacterial or archaeal hosts (viruses of eukaryotes will be added at a future date). The pVOGs are constructed within the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) framework that is widely used for orthology identification in prokaryotes. Since the previous release of the POGs, the size has tripled to nearly 3000 genomes and 300 000 proteins, and the number of conserved orthologous groups doubled to 9518. User-friendly webpages are available, including multiple sequence alignments and HMM profiles for each VOG. These changes provide major improvements to the pVOGs database, at a time of rapid advances in virus genomics. The pVOGs database is hosted jointly at the University of Iowa at http://dmk-brain.ecn.uiowa.edu/pVOGs and the NCBI at ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/kristensen/pVOGs/home.html.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inevitability of Genetic Parasites
Iranzo, J., Puigbò, P., Lobkovsky, A. E., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2016) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evw193 · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Cited by
Kieft, K., Zhou, Z., & Anantharaman, K. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00867-0 · Cited by 1,123
The Human Gut Virome Is Highly Diverse, Stable, and Individual Specific
Shkoporov, A. N., Clooney, A. G., Sutton, T. D. S., Ryan, F. J., Daly, K. M., Nolan, J. A., McDonnell, S. A., Khokhlova, E. V., Draper, L. A., Forde, A., et al. (2019) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2019.09.009 · Cited by 737
The human virome: assembly, composition and host interactions
Liang, G., & Bushman, F. D. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00536-5 · Cited by 624
Whole-Virome Analysis Sheds Light on Viral Dark Matter in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Clooney, A. G., Sutton, T. D. S., Shkoporov, A. N., Holohan, R. K., Daly, K. M., O’Regan, O., Ryan, F. J., Draper, L. A., Plevy, S. E., Ross, R. P., et al. (2019) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2019.10.009 · Cited by 452
Viromes of one year old infants reveal the impact of birth mode on microbiome diversity
McCann, A., Ryan, F. J., Stockdale, S. R., Dalmasso, M., Blake, T., Ryan, C. A., Stanton, C., Mills, S., Ross, P. R., & Hill, C. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4694 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Grazziotin, A. L., Koonin, E. V., & Kristensen, D. M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-10-26
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D491-D498
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2545536333
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prokaryotic Virus Orthologous Groups (pVOGs): a resource for comparative genomics and protein family annotation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkw975
- The paper
- Grazziotin, A. L., Koonin, E. V., & Kristensen, D. M. (2017). Prokaryotic Virus Orthologous Groups (pVOGs): a resource for comparative genomics and protein family annotation. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw975
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.