Cited by 121Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Linnorm: improved statistical analysis for single cell RNA-seq expression data

Open access
Yip, Shun H., Wang, Panwen, Kocher, Jean-Pierre A., Sham, Pak Chung, Wang, Junwen·2017·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Linnorm is a novel normalization and transformation method for the analysis of single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Linnorm is developed to remove technical noises and simultaneously preserve biological variations in scRNA-seq data, such that existing statistical methods can be improved. Using real scRNA-seq data, we compared Linnorm with existing normalization methods, including NODES, SAMstrt, SCnorm, scran, DESeq and TMM. Linnorm shows advantages in speed, technical noise removal and preservation of cell heterogeneity, which can improve existing methods in the discovery of novel subtypes, pseudo-temporal ordering of cells, clustering analysis, etc. Linnorm also performs better than existing DEG analysis methods, including BASiCS, NODES, SAMstrt, Seurat and DESeq2, in false positive rate control and accuracy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkx828

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [2]Islam S., Kjällquist U., Moliner A., Zajac P., Fan J.-B., Lönnerberg P., Linnarsson S. Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq. Genome Res. 2011; 21: 1160– 1167. 21543516 PMC3129258
  2. [3]Tang F., Barbacioru C., Wang Y., Nordman E., Lee C., Xu N., Wang X., Bodeau J., Tuch B.B., Siddiqui A. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods. 2009; 6: 377– 382. 19349980
  3. [4]Katayama S., Tohonen V., Linnarsson S., Kere J. SAMstrt: statistical test for differential expression in single-cell transcriptome with spike-in normalization. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29: 2943– 2945. 23995393 PMC3810855
  4. [6]Zhou X., Lindsay H., Robinson M.D. Robustly detecting differential expression in RNA sequencing data using observation weights. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42: e91. 24753412 PMC4066750
  5. [7]Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15: 550. 25516281 PMC4302049
  6. [8]Ritchie M.E., Phipson B., Wu D., Hu Y., Law C.W., Shi W., Smyth G.K. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43: e47. 25605792 PMC4402510
  7. [9]Robinson M.D., Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010; 11: R25. 20196867 PMC2864565
  8. [10]Brennecke P., Anders S., Kim J.K., Kolodziejczyk A.A., Zhang X., Proserpio V., Baying B., Benes V., Teichmann S.A., Marioni J.C. Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat. Methods. 2013; 10: 1093– 1095. 24056876
  9. [11]Law C.W., Chen Y., Shi W., Smyth G.K. voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 2014; 15: R29. 24485249 PMC4053721
  10. [14]Vallejos C.A., Richardson S., Marioni J.C. Beyond comparisons of means: understanding changes in gene expression at the single-cell level. Genome Biol. 2016; 17: 1. 27083558 PMC4832562
  11. [15]Trapnell C., Cacchiarelli D., Grimsby J., Pokharel P., Li S., Morse M., Lennon N.J., Livak K.J., Mikkelsen T.S., Rinn J.L. Pseudo-temporal ordering of individual cells reveals dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014; 32: 381. 24658644 PMC4122333
  12. [16]Poole W., Gibbs D.L., Shmulevich I., Bernard B., Knijnenburg T.A. Combining dependent P-values with an empirical adaptation of Brown's method. Bioinformatics. 2016; 32: i430– i436. 27587659 PMC5013915
  13. [17]Yan L., Yang M., Guo H., Yang L., Wu J., Li R., Liu P., Lian Y., Zheng X., Yan J. Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013; 20: 1131– 1139. 23934149
  14. [18]Deng Q., Ramskold D., Reinius B., Sandberg R. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic, random monoallelic gene expression in mammalian cells. Science. 2014; 343: 193– 196. 24408435
  15. [20]Klein A.M., Mazutis L., Akartuna I., Tallapragada N., Veres A., Li V., Peshkin L., Weitz D.A., Kirschner M.W. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2015; 161: 1187– 1201. 26000487 PMC4441768
  16. [22]Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30: 2114– 2120. 24695404 PMC4103590
  17. [24]Yates A., Akanni W., Amode M.R., Barrell D., Billis K., Carvalho-Silva D., Cummins C., Clapham P., Fitzgerald S., Gil L. Ensembl 2016. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44: D710– D716. 26687719 PMC4702834
  18. [25]Bacher R., Kendziorski C. Design and computational analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Genome Biol. 2016; 17: 63. 27052890 PMC4823857
  19. [28]Loven J., Orlando D.A., Sigova A.A., Lin C.Y., Rahl P.B., Burge C.B., Levens D.L., Lee T.I., Young R.A. Revisiting global gene expression analysis. Cell. 2012; 151: 476– 482. 23101621 PMC3505597
  20. [29]Lin C.Y., Lovén J., Rahl P.B., Paranal R.M., Burge C.B., Bradner J.E., Lee T.I., Young R.A. Transcriptional amplification in tumor cells with elevated c-Myc. Cell. 2012; 151: 56– 67. 23021215 PMC3462372
  21. [30]Synnergren J., Giesler T.L., Adak S., Tandon R., Noaksson K., Lindahl A., Nilsson P., Nelson D., Olsson B., Englund M.C. Differentiating human embryonic stem cells express a unique housekeeping gene signature. Stem Cells. 2007; 25: 473– 480. 17284652
  22. [32]Rapaport F., Khanin R., Liang Y., Pirun M., Krek A., Zumbo P., Mason C.E., Socci N.D., Betel D. Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2013; 14: R95. 24020486 PMC4054597

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yip, S. H., Wang, P., Kocher, J.-P. A., Sham, P. C., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Wang, Junwen
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2017-09-18
Volume
45
Issue
22
Pages
e179-e179
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2755506013
Cited by
121
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, data normalization, differential expression analysis, cellular heterogeneity, clustering, false positive rate control
MeSH terms
Algorithms, RNA, Reproducibility of Results, Cluster Analysis, Linear Models, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Biostatistics, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review