Cited by 547Cancer-related molecular mechanisms researchGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA Research and Splicing

LNCipedia 5: towards a reference set of human long non-coding RNAs

Open access
Volders, Pieter-Jan, Anckaert, Jasper, Verheggen, Kenneth, Nuytens, Justine, Martens, Lennart, Mestdagh, Pieter, Vandesompele, Jo·2019·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

While long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) research in the past has primarily focused on the discovery of novel genes, today it has shifted towards functional annotation of this large class of genes. With thousands of lncRNA studies published every year, the current challenge lies in keeping track of which lncRNAs are functionally described. This is further complicated by the fact that lncRNA nomenclature is not straightforward and lncRNA annotation is scattered across different resources with their own quality metrics and definition of a lncRNA. To overcome this issue, large scale curation and annotation is needed. Here, we present the fifth release of the human lncRNA database LNCipedia (https://lncipedia.org). The most notable improvements include manual literature curation of 2482 lncRNA articles and the use of official gene symbols when available. In addition, an improved filtering pipeline results in a higher quality reference lncRNA gene set.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gky1031

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Uszczynska-Ratajczak B., Lagarde J., Frankish A., Guigó R., Johnson R. Towards a complete map of the human long non-coding RNA transcriptome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018; 19: 535– 548. 29795125 PMC6451964

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volders, P.-J., Anckaert, J., Verheggen, K., Nuytens, J., Martens, L., Mestdagh, P., & Vandesompele, J.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Volders, Pieter-Jan
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2018-10-29
Volume
47
Issue
D1
Pages
D135-D139
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2899028887
Cited by
547
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 1
FWCI
17.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ghent University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
long non-coding RNA, lncRNA database, lncRNA annotation, functional annotation, literature curation, gene symbols
MeSH terms
Humans, Computational Biology, Genomics, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Molecular Sequence Annotation, RNA, Long Noncoding, Web Browser

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review