Genomes OnLine database (GOLD) v.7: updates and new features
Open accessAbstract
The Genomes Online Database (GOLD) (https://gold.jgi.doe.gov) is an open online resource, which maintains an up-to-date catalog of genome and metagenome projects in the context of a comprehensive list of associated metadata. Information in GOLD is organized into four levels: Study, Biosample/Organism, Sequencing Project and Analysis Project. Currently GOLD hosts information on 33 415 Studies, 49 826 Biosamples, 313 324 Organisms, 215 881 Sequencing Projects and 174 454 Analysis Projects with a total of 541 metadata fields, of which 80 are based on controlled vocabulary (CV) terms. GOLD provides a user-friendly web interface to browse sequencing projects and launch advanced search tools across four classification levels. Users submit metadata on a wide range of Sequencing and Analysis Projects in GOLD before depositing sequence data to the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system for analysis. GOLD conforms with and supports the rules set by the Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC) Minimum Information standards. The current version of GOLD (v.7) has seen the number of projects and associated metadata increase exponentially over the years. This paper provides an update on the current status of GOLD and highlights the new features added over the last two years.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MGnify curators add supplementary metadata to imported studies, assigning a relevant biome selected from GOLD biosample hierarchy.
“The distinction between MGnify studies and ENA projects is important, as MGnify curators add supplementary metadata to imported studies, assigning a relevant biome selected from the Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) (17) biosample hierarchy.”
From MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020 (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors
Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., & Coulson, A. R. (1977) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 · Cited by 68,572 · see citing works
Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life
Parks, D. H., Rinke, C., Chuvochina, M., Chaumeil, P.-A., Woodcroft, B. J., Evans, P. N., Hugenholtz, P., & Tyson, G. W. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7 · Cited by 1,882 · see citing works
Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical?
Stephens, Z. D., Lee, S. Y., Faghri, F., Campbell, R. H., Zhai, C., Efron, M. J., Iyer, R., Schatz, M. C., Sinha, S., & Robinson, G. E. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002195 · Cited by 1,340 · see citing works
Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria
Brown, C. T., Hug, L. A., Thomas, B. C., Sharon, I., Castelle, C. J., Singh, A., Wilkins, M. J., Wrighton, K. C., Williams, K. H., & Banfield, J. F. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14486 · Cited by 1,216 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This can be largely attributed to the increasing interest in sequencing of metagenome samples as well as several recent large-scale projects to identify novel MAGs from environmental samples (22,23).”
BackgroundDNA sequencing at 40: past, present and future
Shendure, J., Balasubramanian, S., Church, G. M., Gilbert, W., Rogers, J., Schloss, J. A., & Waterston, R. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24286 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Anantharaman, K., Brown, C., Hug, L., Sharon, I., Castelle, C., Probst, A., Thomas, B., Singh, A., Wilkins, M., Karaoz, U., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13219 · Cited by 1,040 · see citing works
A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea
Wu, D., Hugenholtz, P., Mavromatis, K., Pukall, R., Dalin, E., Ivanova, N., Kunin, V., Goodwin, L., Wu, M., Tindall, B. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08656 · Cited by 998 · see citing works
Self-citationEarth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life
Lewin, H. A., Robinson, G. E., Kress, W. J., Baker, W. J., Coddington, J., Crandall, K. A., Durbin, R., Edwards, S. V., Forest, F., Gilbert, M. T. P., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1720115115 · Cited by 962 · see citing works
The Earth Microbiome project: successes and aspirations
Gilbert, J. A., Jansson, J. K., & Knight, R. D. (2014) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-014-0069-1 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Yilmaz, P., Kottmann, R., Field, D., Knight, R. D., Cole, J. R., Amaral‐Zettler, L., Gilbert, J. A., Karsch‐Mizrachi, I., Johnston, A., Cochrane, G., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1823 · Cited by 802 · see citing works
Self-citationInternational Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes
Parker, C. T., Tindall, B. J., & Garrity, G. M. (2015) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.000778 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
IMG/M: integrated genome and metagenome comparative data analysis system
Chen, I.-M. A., Markowitz, V. M., Chu, K., Palaniappan, K., Szeto, E., Pillay, M., Ratner, A., Huang, J., Andersen, E., Huntemann, M., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw929 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Self-citationThe standard operating procedure of the DOE-JGI Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MGAP v.4)
Huntemann, M., Ivanova, N., Mavromatis, K., Tripp, H. J., Páez-Espino, D., Palaniappan, K., Szeto, E., Pillay, M., Chen, I.-M. A., Pati, A., et al. (2015) · Standards in Genomic Sciences · doi:10.1186/s40793-015-0077-y · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Genome 10K Project: A Way Forward
Koepfli, K.-P., Paten, B., Scientists, T. G. 1. C. O., & O’Brien, S. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-090414-014900 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD): a monitor of genome projects world-wide
Bernal, A. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.1.126 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life
Mukherjee, S., Seshadri, R., Varghese, N. J., Eloe‐Fadrosh, E. A., Meier‐Kolthoff, J. P., Göker, M., Coates, R. C., Hadjithomas, M., Pavlopoulos, G. A., Páez-Espino, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3886 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge-scale contamination of microbial isolate genomes by Illumina PhiX control
Mukherjee, S., Huntemann, M., Ivanova, N., Kyrpides, N. C., & Pati, A. (2015) · Standards in Genomic Sciences · doi:10.1186/1944-3277-10-18 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Self-citationGenomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.6: data updates and feature enhancements
Mukherjee, S., Stamatis, D., Bertsch, J., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw992 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Self-citationThe MAR databases: development and implementation of databases specific for marine metagenomics
Klemetsen, T., Raknes, I. A., Fu, J., Agafonov, A., Balasundaram, S. V., Tartari, G., Robertsen, E. M., & Willassen, N. P. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1036 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Sibbald, S. J., & Archibald, J. (2017) · Nature Ecology &Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0145 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Díaz‐Muñoz, S. L. (2017) · Virus Evolution · doi:10.1093/ve/vex011 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Whitman, W. B., Woyke, T., Klenk, H., Zhou, Y., Lilburn, T., Beck, B. J., Vos, P. D., Vandamme, P. A. R., Eisen, J. A., Garrity, G. M., et al. (2015) · Standards in Genomic Sciences · doi:10.1186/s40793-015-0017-x · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationShen, J., Chen, C. R., & Lewis, T. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19639 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
A call for standardized classification of metagenome projects
Ivanova, N., Tringe, S. G., Liolios, K., et al. (2010) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02270.x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Genomic Standards Consortium Projects
Field, D., Sterk, P. J., Kottmann, R., et al. (2014) · Standards in Genomic Sciences · doi:10.4056/sigs.5559680 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Vigneron, A., Bishop, A., Alsop, E., Hull, K., Rhodes, I., Hendricks, R., Head, I., & Tsesmetzis, N. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00593 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Mycoplasma contamination in the 1000 Genomes Project
Langdon, W. B. (2014) · BioData Mining · doi:10.1186/1756-0381-7-3 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Genomic Standards Consortium Projects
Field, D., Sterk, P. J., Kottmann, R., et al. (2014) · Standards in Genomic Sciences · doi:10.4056/sigs.5559608 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Rule 27 of the International Code of Nomenclature of prokaryotes: the basonym is not enough
Tindall, B. J. (2016) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.001369 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Interactive microbial distribution analysis using BioAtlas
Lund, J., List, M., & Baumbach, J. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx304 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome
Almeida, A., Nayfach, S., Boland, M., Strozzi, F., Beracochea, M., Shi, Z. J., Pollard, K. S., Sakharova, E., Parks, D. H., Hugenholtz, P., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0603-3 · Cited by 1,367 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman gut bacteria produce ΤΗ17-modulating bile acid metabolites
Paik, D., Yao, L., Zhang, Y., Bae, S., D’Agostino, G. D., Zhang, M., Kim, E., Franzosa, E. A., Avila-Pacheco, J., Bisanz, J. E., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04480-z · Cited by 594 · see citing works
MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020
Mitchell, A. L., Almeida, A., Beracochea, M., Boland, M., Burgin, J., Cochrane, G., Crusoe, M. R., Kale, V., Potter, S. C., Richardson, L. J., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1035 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mukherjee, S., Stamatis, D., Bertsch, J., Ovchinnikova, G., Katta, H. Y., Mojica, A., Chen, I.-M. A., Kyrpides, N. C., & Reddy, T.
- Affiliations
- Joint Genome Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kyrpides, Nikos C
- Reddy, TBK
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-10-24
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D649-D659
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- PMC
- PMC6323969
- OpenAlex
- W2898201023
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Keywords
- genome projects, metadata catalog, controlled vocabulary, Genomic Standards Consortium, microbial genomics, online databases
- MeSH terms
- Software, Genomics, Databases, Genetic, Gene Ontology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review