Cited by 13Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Decoding functional proteome information in model organisms using protein language models

Open access
Barrios-Núñez, Israel, Martínez-Redondo, Gemma I, Medina-Burgos, Patricia, Cases, Ildefonso, Fernández, Rosa, Rojas, Ana M·2024·NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein language models have been tested and proved to be reliable when used on curated datasets but have not yet been applied to full proteomes. Accordingly, we tested how two different machine learning-based methods performed when decoding functional information from the proteomes of selected model organisms. We found that protein language models are more precise and informative than deep learning methods for all the species tested and across the three gene ontologies studied, and that they better recover functional information from transcriptomic experiments. The results obtained indicate that these language models are likely to be suitable for large-scale annotation and downstream analyses, and we recommend a guide for their use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nargab/lqae078

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrios-Núñez, I., Martínez-Redondo, G. I., Medina-Burgos, P., Cases, I., Fernández, R., & Rojas, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Metazoa Phylogenomics Lab, Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF) , 08003  Barcelona , Spain
  • Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (ES)
  • Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Cases, Ildefonso
  • Fernández, Rosa
  • Rojas, Ana M
Venue
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Published
2024-07-02
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
lqae078-lqae078
ISSN
2631-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400242398
Cited by
13
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, PID2021-127503OB-I00, PID2019-108824GA-I00, RYC2017-22492, MDM-2016-0687)
  • LifeHUB/CSIC Research Network (PIE-202120E047)
  • European Research Council (948281)
  • Human Frontier Science Program (RGY0056/2022)
  • Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca del Departament d’Economia i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR 2021-SGR00420)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein language models, model organisms, Gene Ontology, deep learning model comparison, protein function prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review