Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 433

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Body mass index and mortality in ‘healthier’ as compared with ‘sicker’ haemodialysis patients: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

Leavey, Sean F., McCullough, Keith, Hecking, Erwin, Goodkin, David, Port, Friedrich K., Young, Eric W.·2001·Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis (HD) patients with lower body mass index (BMI) have a higher relative mortality risk (RR), irrespective of race. However, only Asian Americans treated with HD have been found to have an elevated RR with higher BMI. Asian Americans on HD are 'healthier' than other race groups (i.e. have better overall survival). We hypothesized that an increased mortality risk might be associated with high BMI in a variety of other 'healthier' subgroups of HD patients. METHODS: The prospective Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) provided baseline demographic, comorbidity and BMI data on 9714 HD patients in the US and Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK) from 1996-2000. Using multivariate survival analyses, we evaluated BMI-mortality relationships in HD subpopulations defined by continent, race (black and white), gender, tertiles of severity of illness (based on a score derived from comorbid conditions and serum albumin concentration), age (<45, 45-64, >or=65), smoking, and diabetic status. RESULTS: Relative mortality risk decreased with increasing BMI. This was statistically significant (P<0.007) except for the smallest subgroup of patients who were <45 years old and were also in the healthiest tertile of comorbidity. All else equal, BMI <20 was consistently associated with the highest relative mortality risk. Overall a lower relative mortality risk (RR) as compared with BMI 23-24.9, was found for overweight (BMI 25-29.9; RR 0.84, P=0.008), for mild obesity (BMI 30-34.9; RR 0.73, P=0.0003), and for moderate obesity (BMI 35-39.9; RR 0.76, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: In a wide variety of HD patient subgroups, differing with respect to their baseline health status, increasing body size correlates with a decreased mortality risk. This contrasts with the association between BMI and mortality in the general population, and deserves further study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ndt/16.12.2386

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 433

Metadata

Authors
Leavey, S. F., McCullough, K., Hecking, E., Goodkin, D., Port, F. K., & Young, E. W.
Venue
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
2386-2394
ISSN
  • 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2385
OpenAlex
W2171699471
Cited by
433
References
1
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body mass index and mortality in ‘healthier’ as compared with ‘sicker’ haemodialysis patients: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ndt/16.12.2386
The paper
Leavey, S. F., McCullough, K., Hecking, E., Goodkin, D., Port, F. K., & Young, E. W. (2001). Body mass index and mortality in ‘healthier’ as compared with ‘sicker’ haemodialysis patients: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/16.12.2386

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.