Cited by 567Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsObesity, Physical Activity, DietCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Association of Weight Status With Mortality in Adults With Incident Diabetes

Open access
Carnethon, Mercedes R., De Chavez, Peter John D., Biggs, Mary L., Lewis, Cora E., Pankow, James S., Bertoni, Alain G., Golden, Sherita H., Liu, Kiang +3 more·2012·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Type 2 diabetes in normal-weight adults (body mass index [BMI] <25) is a representation of the metabolically obese normal-weight phenotype with unknown mortality consequences. OBJECTIVE: To test the association of weight status with mortality in adults with new-onset diabetes in order to minimize the influence of diabetes duration and voluntary weight loss on mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Pooled analysis of 5 longitudinal cohort studies: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, 1990-2006; Cardiovascular Health Study, 1992-2008; Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults, 1987-2011; Framingham Offspring Study, 1979-2007; and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, 2002-2011. A total of 2625 participants with incident diabetes contributed 27,125 person-years of follow-up. Included were men and women (age >40 years) who developed incident diabetes based on fasting glucose 126 mg/dL or greater or newly initiated diabetes medication and who had concurrent measurements of BMI. Participants were classified as normal weight if their BMI was 18.5 to 24.99 or overweight/obese if BMI was 25 or greater. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: The proportion of adults who were normal weight at the time of incident diabetes ranged from 9% to 21% (overall 12%). During follow-up, 449 participants died: 178 from cardiovascular causes and 253 from noncardiovascular causes (18 were not classified). The rates of total, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality were higher in normal-weight participants (284.8, 99.8, and 198.1 per 10,000 person-years, respectively) than in overweight/obese participants (152.1, 67.8, and 87.9 per 10,000 person-years, respectively). After adjustment for demographic characteristics and blood pressure, lipid levels, waist circumference, and smoking status, hazard ratios comparing normal-weight participants with overweight/obese participants for total, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality were 2.08 (95% CI, 1.52-2.85), 1.52 (95% CI, 0.89-2.58), and 2.32 (95% CI, 1.55-3.48), respectively. CONCLUSION: Adults who were normal weight at the time of incident diabetes had higher mortality than adults who are overweight or obese.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2012.9282

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A paradoxical survival advantage with higher BMI exists in the elderly and in a broad range of illnesses, including diabetes mellitus, chronic heart failure, acute heart failure, coronary artery disease, and percutaneous coronary artery interventions.

    “the case is strong that such a paradoxical relation exists in the elderly, 7 and accompanying a broad range of illnesses, including diabetes mellitus, 8 chronic heart failure, 9,10 acute heart failure, 11 coronary artery disease, 12 and percutaneous coronary artery interventions.13”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Uretsky S Messerli FH Bangalore S Obesity Paradox in Patients with Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease The American Journal of Medicine 2007 120 10 863 870 17904457

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carnethon, M. R., De Chavez, P. J. D., Biggs, M. L., Lewis, C. E., Pankow, J. S., Bertoni, A. G., Golden, S. H., Liu, K., Mukamal, K. J., Campbell-Jenkins, B., & Dyer, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Carnethon, Mercedes R.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2012-08-08
Volume
308
Issue
6
Pages
581-90
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2040767736
Cited by
567
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 16
FWCI
48.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95095-66-0-1, n01hc95164-17-0-1, n01hc085082-026, n01hc085081-021, n01hc045133-001, n01hc48050-59-0-1, n01hc085079-024, n01hc015103-009, n01hc48048-58-0-1, n01hc085084-005, n01hc55021-47-0-1, n01hc085085-011, n01hc085083-027, n01hc95165-34-0-1, n01hc48047-55-0-1, n01hc55020-39-0-0, n01hc085080-026, n01hc55016-37-0-0, n01hc055022-024, n01hc95161-24-0-1, n01hc095169-003, n01hc085086-022, n01hc48049-61-0-1, n01hc95162-31-0-1, n01hc55019-35-0-1, n01hc95160-18-0-1, n01hc55018-38-0-1, n01hc95163-22-0-1, n01hc55222-0-0-0, n01hc95159-40-0-1, n01hc075150-004, n01hc035129-010, n01hc55015-48-0-1)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 20098, R56AG023629, R01AG020098, AG023629, AG027058, R56AG020098, R01AG023629, R01AG015928, R01AG027058)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-85081, N01HC85085, N01-HC55022, N01 HC085086, N01HC48050, N01HC-85083, N01 HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01 HC055016, N01-HC-55018, N01-HC095169, N01-HC-095165, N0-1-HC-85239, N01 HC 95095, N01 HC 55020, N01 HC085079, (N01-HC-95163, N01 HC 55019, N01HC85082, N01HC‐75150, N01 HC85086, N01 HC-95161, N01 HC95165, N01HC95164, N01 HC048048, N01 HC055020, N01 HC035129, N01-HC-048049, N01HC85080, N01-HC-095159, N01 HC055018, N01 HC015103, N01 HC095095, N01 HC55222, N01 HC048050, N01-HC48048, ­N01-HC55016, N01 HC055022, N01-HC-48-049, U01HL080295, N01 HC055019, N01 HC055222, N01 HC048047, N01-HC-480-47, HL080295, R01HL080295, N01‐HC‐55015, N01 HC-95162, N01-HC55021, N01 HC075150, N01 HC055021, N01 HC055015, N01 HC045133, R01HL078972, N01-HC85079, ­N01-HC85084, N01 HC95169)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK079637, R21DK082903)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, normal-weight individuals, body mass index, weight status, mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality, new-onset diabetes, overweight and obesity, diabetes duration, weight loss, cardiovascular risk factors, sex differences, racial and ethnic differences, socioeconomic status, alcohol consumption, physical activity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, United States, Body Mass Index, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review