Cited by 75Renal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Effect of different immunosuppressive regimens on the evolution of distinct metabolic parameters: Evidence from the symphony study

Claes, K., Meier-Kriesche, H.-U., Schold, J. D., Vanrenterghem, Y., Halloran, P. F., Ekberg, H.·2012·Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The metabolic syndrome (MS) is an important risk factor for graft dysfunction and patient death after renal transplantation. The aim of this sub-analysis of the Symphony study was to assess the progression of the laboratory parameters associated with MS in the first year after transplantation. METHODS: Data collected from the Symphony study were used; 1645 patients were randomized to receive standard-dose cyclosporine (Stand-CsA), low-dose cyclosporine (Low-CsA), tacrolimus (Low-Tac) or sirolimus (Low-SRL), in addition to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids. Data were collected for levels and progression over the first year post-transplantation of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, uric acid, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and fasting glucose levels by treatment arm. RESULTS: The low-SRL group had significantly higher levels of triglycerides and LDL. The two CsA arms were associated with the highest uric acid levels at each time point. There were no significant differences in overall levels or changes in glucose or HDL. Patients in the standard-CsA arm had significantly higher diastolic blood pressure than those in the Low-SRL and Low-Tac arms. Systolic blood pressure was higher in the Low-CsA arm than in the Low-Tac arm. The use of antihypertensive and antidiabetic agents was similar between the treatment arms. In the Low-SRL arm, more patients were treated with lipid-lowering therapy. Mean daily steroid doses were the highest in the Low-SRL arm. CONCLUSIONS: This sub-analysis demonstrates that there is a difference in metabolic parameters between immunosuppressive groups. CsA therapy was associated with the highest values of uric acid and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Patients on SRL therapy had the worst lipaemic control. A possible effect of Tac on new-onset diabetes could not be excluded.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ndt/gfr238

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Testosterone replacement improves glycemia, dyslipidemia, hepatic steatosis, body composition, and cardiovascular risk.

    “testosterone replacement improves glycemia, dyslipidemia, hepatic steatosis, body composition, and CVD risk”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1574]

    The Discussion and Cholesterol sections examine glucose, lipids, blood pressure and BMI in kidney-transplant recipients receiving different immunosuppressive regimens. A search for testosterone replacement, and for testosterone, androgen and hepatic steatosis, found no passage addressing its effects on the claimed outcomes. The copy therefore cannot verify the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Testosterone replacement prevents progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes.

    “and also prevents progression from prediabetes to T2D.1571–1574”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1574]

    The Discussion addresses new-onset diabetes and glucose tolerance after renal transplantation under different immunosuppressive regimens. Searches for testosterone replacement and progression from prediabetes found no passage addressing that claim; the paper’s findings about immunosuppression do not establish or contradict it. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three modestly sized trials and the large randomized SEAS trial (1,873 patients treated with simvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo) failed to show a reduction in clinical progression of aortic stenosis in patients with mild-to-moderate native valve aortic stenosis.

    “Three modestly sized trials [479-481] and one large randomized trial (SEAS, which included 1873 patients treated with simvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo) [266] failed to show a reduction in the clinical progression of aortic stenosis in patients with mild-to-moderate native valve aortic stenosis.”
  • Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses of observational and randomized trials have not confirmed that lipid lowering slows aortic stenosis progression.

    “However, this has not been confirmed in RCTs [266,479-481], or in meta-analyses of observational and randomized trials [482,483].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Claes, K., Meier-Kriesche, H.-U., Schold, J. D., Vanrenterghem, Y., Halloran, P. F., & Ekberg, H.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2011-05-26
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
850-857
ISSN
  • 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2385
OpenAlex
W2164877125
Cited by
75
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive regimens, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, rapamycin, low-dose immunosuppression, blood pressure, uric acid, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, lipid control, corticosteroid dose, new-onset diabetes
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adult, Blood Chemical Analysis, Blood Pressure Determination, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Immunosuppressive Agents, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Mycophenolic Acid, Prognosis, Reference Values, Transplantation Immunology, Body Mass Index, Kidney Transplantation, Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine, Risk Assessment, Sirolimus, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review