Cited by 285Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesSmoking Behavior and CessationChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Cigarette smoking and chronic kidney disease in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Xia, Jia, Wang, Lin, Ma, Zhiheng, Zhong, Liping, Wang, Ying, Gao, Yachan, He, Liqun, Su, Xiao·2017·Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Abstract

Background Cigarette smoking has been established as a major risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) development in people with diabetes. Conflicting evidence exists among representative community-based studies as to whether smoking is an independent risk factor for CKD. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effects of tobacco smoking on the development of CKD in adult general populations. Methods A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase from their inception through 31 May 2016 for prospective cohort studies that reported relative risks of CKD with smoking status in the general population. Summary relative risks (SRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Results A total of 15 prospective cohort studies, including 65 064 incident CKD cases, were included. Compared with never-smokers, the SRRs of incident CKD were 1.27 (95% CI 1.19-1.35) for ever-smokers, 1.34 (95% CI 1.23-1.47) for current smokers and 1.15 (95% CI 1.08-1.23) for former smokers. The SRRs for end-stage renal disease development were 1.51 (95% CI 1.24-1.84) for ever-smokers, 1.44 (95% CI 1.00-2.09) for former smokers and 1.91 (95% CI 1.39-2.64) for current smokers. Considerable heterogeneity was observed among these studies. After combining an additional three prospective cohort studies, which involved 5747 incident proteinuria cases, a null smoking-proteinuria association in the general population was observed. Conclusions Our meta-ana…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ndt/gfw452

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xia, J., Wang, L., Ma, Z., Zhong, L., Wang, Y., Gao, Y., He, L., & Su, X.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Venue
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2017-02-27
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
475-487
ISSN
  • 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2385
OpenAlex
W2600216720
Cited by
285
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
cigarette smoking, chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, smoking as risk factor, proteinuria, smoking cessation, general population, current smokers, former smokers
MeSH terms
Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Smoking, Cohort Studies, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review