The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ionizing radiation and the risk of brain and central nervous system tumors: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Although exposure to moderate-to-high doses of ionizing radiation is the only established environmental risk factor for brain and CNS tumors, it is not clear whether this relationship differs across tumor subtypes, by sex or age at exposure, or at the low-to-moderate range of exposure. This systematic review summarizes the epidemiologic evidence on the association between ionizing radiation exposure and risk of brain/CNS tumors. Articles included in this review estimated radiation exposure doses to the brain and reported excess relative risk (ERR) estimates for brain/CNS tumors. Eight cohorts were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Average age at exposure ranged from 8 months to 26 years. Mean dose to the brain ranged from 0.07 to 10 Gy. Elevated risks for brain/CNS tumors were consistently observed in relation to ionizing radiation exposure, but the strength of this association varied across cohorts. Generally, ionizing radiation was more strongly associated with risk for meningioma compared with glioma. The positive association between ionizing radiation exposure and risk for glioma was stronger for younger vs older ages at exposure. We did not observe an effect modification on the risk for meningioma by sex, age at exposure, time since exposure, or attained age. The etiologic role of ionizing radiation in the development of brain/CNS tumors needs to be clarified further through additional studies that quantify the association between ionizing radiation and risk for brain/CNS tumors at low-to-moderate doses, examine risks across tumor subtypes, and account for potential effect modifiers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07385 · Cited by 7,735
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?
Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.2.193 · Cited by 4,256
Cited by
Ostrom, Q. T., Patil, N., Cioffi, G., Waite, K., Kruchko, C., & Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S. (2020) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa200 · Cited by 1,789
Ostrom, Q. T., Price, M., Neff, C., Cioffi, G., Waite, K. A., Kruchko, C., & Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S. (2023) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad149 · Cited by 1,294
Risk factors for childhood and adult primary brain tumors
Ostrom, Q. T., Fahmideh, M. A., Cote, D. J., Muskens, I. S., Schraw, J. M., Scheurer, M. E., & Bondy, M. L. (2019) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noz123 · Cited by 314
Targeting receptor-ligand chemistry for drug delivery across blood-brain barrier in brain diseases
Anthony, D. P., Hegde, M., Shetty, S. S., Rafic, T., Mutalik, S., & Rao, B. S. S. (2021) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119326 · Cited by 110
Tritos, N. A., Johannsson, G., Korbonits, M., Miller, K. K., Feldt-Rasmussen, U., Yuen, K. C. J., King, D., Mattsson, A. F., Jonsson, P. J., Koltowska-Haggstrom, M., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2014-1013 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Braganza, M. Z., Kitahara, C. M., Berrington de Gonzalez, A., Inskip, P. D., Johnson, K. J., & Rajaraman, P.
- Venue
- Neuro-Oncology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-09-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1316-1324
- ISSN
- 1522-8517 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-5866
- OpenAlex
- W2112852909
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionizing radiation and the risk of brain and central nervous system tumors: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/neuonc/nos208
- The paper
- Braganza, M. Z., Kitahara, C. M., Berrington de Gonzalez, A., Inskip, P. D., Johnson, K. J., & Rajaraman, P. (2012). Ionizing radiation and the risk of brain and central nervous system tumors: a systematic review. Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.