Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques

Open access
Macyszyn, Luke, Akbari, Hamed, Pisapia, Jared M., Da, Xiao, Attiah, Mark, Pigrish, Vadim, Bi, Yingtao, Pal, Sharmistha, Davuluri, Ramana V., Roccograndi, Laura, Dahmane, Nadia, Martinez-Lage, Maria, Biros, George, Wolf, Ronald L., Bilello, Michel, O'Rourke, Donald M., Davatzikos, Christos·2016·Neuro-Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MRI characteristics of brain gliomas have been used to predict clinical outcome and molecular tumor characteristics. However, previously reported imaging biomarkers have not been sufficiently accurate or reproducible to enter routine clinical practice and often rely on relatively simple MRI measures. The current study leverages advanced image analysis and machine learning algorithms to identify complex and reproducible imaging patterns predictive of overall survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma (GB). METHODS: One hundred five patients with GB were first used to extract approximately 60 diverse features from preoperative multiparametric MRIs. These imaging features were used by a machine learning algorithm to derive imaging predictors of patient survival and molecular subtype. Cross-validation ensured generalizability of these predictors to new patients. Subsequently, the predictors were evaluated in a prospective cohort of 29 new patients. RESULTS: Survival curves yielded a hazard ratio of 10.64 for predicted long versus short survivors. The overall, 3-way (long/medium/short survival) accuracy in the prospective cohort approached 80%. Classification of patients into the 4 molecular subtypes of GB achieved 76% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: By employing machine learning techniques, we were able to demonstrate that imaging patterns are highly predictive of patient survival. Additionally, we found that GB subtypes have distinctive imaging phenotypes. These results reveal that when imaging markers related to infiltration, cell density, microvascularity, and blood-brain barrier compromise are integrated via advanced pattern analysis methods, they form very accurate predictive biomarkers. These predictive markers used solely preoperative images, hence they can significantly augment diagnosis and treatment of GB patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/neuonc/nov127

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Macyszyn, L., Akbari, H., Pisapia, J. M., Da, X., Attiah, M., Pigrish, V., Bi, Y., Pal, S., Davuluri, R. V., Roccograndi, L., Dahmane, N., Martinez-Lage, M., Biros, G., Wolf, R. L., Bilello, M., O'Rourke, D. M., & Davatzikos, C.
Venue
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2015-07-16
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
417-425
ISSN
  • 1522-8517 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-5866
OpenAlex
W2221563957
Cited by
301
References
4
FWCI
16.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/neuonc/nov127
The paper
Macyszyn, L., Akbari, H., Pisapia, J. M., Da, X., Attiah, M., Pigrish, V., Bi, Y., Pal, S., Davuluri, R. V., Roccograndi, L., Dahmane, N., Martinez-Lage, M., Biros, G., Wolf, R. L., Bilello, M., O'Rourke, D. M., & Davatzikos, C. (2016). Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques. Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov127

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.