Cited by 95COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSmoking Behavior and CessationChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Impact of smoking status on disease severity and mortality of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Karanasos, Antonios, Aznaouridis, Konstantinos, Latsios, George, Synetos, Andreas, Plitaria, Stella, Tousoulis, Dimitrios, Toutouzas, Konstantinos·2020·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has raised concern regarding risk factors associated with disease severity and case fatality. In this context, the association of smoking with severity and mortality of COVID-19 infection remains controversial.1 We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize relevant studies and quantify the impact of smoking on disease severity and mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The primary outcome was a composite for disease severity including severe disease (including critical cases), ICU admission or invasive ventilation, and adverse disease progression or refractory disease. The secondary outcome was death. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) full-length original research publications in peer-reviewed journals in English; (2) inclusion of hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 infection; (3) reported incidence of smoking stratified by a component of the primary outcome or mortality status; and (4) sample size > 20 patients. Details of literature search, data extraction, and statistical analysis are available in online Supplementary Material. Briefly, a systematic review of literature from September 1, 2019 to May 4, 2020 was performed, and additional data sources were identified through manually searching references. Two independent reviewers (A.K. and K.A.) recorded the incidence of smoking per group and performed an assessment of study quality using seven indicators (see online Supplementary Material for details). The initial search identified 652 results. After screening titles and/or abstracts, 166 articles remained for full-text assessment from which 146 were subsequently excluded. Two additional studies were identified by searching references. Overall, 22 studies met our inclusion criteria, 17 reporting on severity,2–18 4 on mortality,19–22 and 1 on both23 (Supplementary Table). Study quality was generally low (Figure 1; online Supplementary Material). For the primary outcome of disease severity, 18 studies were included with 6310 patients.2,4–19,21 Smoking modestly increased the risk for the combined end point of disease severity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.07–1.67, I2 = 45%) (Figure 1A). Sensitivity analyses were consistent (online Supplementary Material). After restricting the analysis in studies explicitly reporting current smoking, the association of smoking with disease severity was not statistically significant (10 studies with 4152 patients; OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.84–1.50, I2 = 38%). Forest plot and risk of bias tables examining in hospitalized COVID-19 patients the association of smoking with (A) the composite end point of disease severity in China and in US regions and (B) mortality. Boxes represent odds ratio (OR) and lines represent the 95% confidence interval [CI] for individual studies. Diamonds and their width represent pooled ORs and the 95% CI, respectively. There was a difference (p = .03) between Chinese studies (16 studies—4423 patients; OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.17–1.87; I2 = 40%)2,4,6–12,14–19,21 and US studies (2 studies—1887 patients; OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.33–1.29; I2 = 0%).5,13 Visual inspection of the funnel plot did not reveal publication bias. Meta-regression analyses are reported in online Supplementary Material. Age (Z = −0.91, p = .05) and diabetes (Z = −2.81, p = .005) had significant negative associations with log-OR of smoking for disease severity (Supplementary Figure). In studies with low (<15%) prevalence of diabetes, smoking increased the risk for severe disease (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.26–2.18, I2 = 34%), whereas in studies with high (≥15%) prevalence of diabetes, there was a trend for a negative association (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.46–1.08, I2 = 0%) (χ2 for subgroup differences = 10.82, p = 0.001) (Supplementary Figure). For mortality, five studies with 838 patients were included.3,9,20,22,23 Smoking was not significantly associated with increased mortality (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 0.78–2.72, I2 = 18%) (Figure 1B). Results were similar for studies explicitly reporting current smoking (2 studies—465 patients; OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 0.75–2.31, I2 = 0%). Our main findings were (1) that smoking modestly increases the risk of severe disease in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, whereas mortality data suggest a similar effect size but are currently inconclusive due to a low sample size and (2) that this increased risk for disease severity is more prominent in younger patients without diabetes. Although smoking may enhance lung inflammation, increase epithelial cell permeability, and cause mucus overproduction and impaired mucociliary clearance,24 its specific impact on COVID-19 disease is controversial. Hypotheses support both a potentially hazardous impact via overexpression of the ACE2 receptor gene24 and a potentially protective effect via attenuation of the commonly observed in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection excessive immune response.1 Our findings demonstrate an adverse impact

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntaa107

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence that smoking increases the risk for severe complications and death from COVID-19 may additionally strengthen calls for tobacco tax increases.

    “Evidence that smoking increases the risk for severe complications and death from COVID-19 may additionally strengthen calls for tobacco tax increases.78–80”

    From Seven-year tobacco tax plan in Ukraine: a case study of the actors, tactics and factors motivating policy passage (2022) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Results report a modest increase in severe disease among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but no statistically significant association with mortality. The paper describes the mortality evidence as inconclusive, so it does not establish the claimed increased risk of death. The tobacco-tax proposal is the citing authors’ framing, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Changeux J-P, Amoura Z, Rey F, Miyara M. A nicotinic hypothesis for Covid-19 with preventive and therapeutic implications. Qeios. 2020. doi:10.32388/FXGQSB.2. · DOI
  2. Chen Q, Zheng Z, Zhang C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 145 patients with corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Taizhou, Zhejiang, China. Infection. 2020. doi:10.1007/s15010-020-01432-5. · DOI
  3. Feng Y, Ling Y, Bai T, et al. COVID-19 with different severities: a multi-center study of clinical features. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(11):1380-1388.
  4. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708-1720.
  5. Li X, Xu S, Yu M, et al. Risk factors for severity and mortality in adult COVID-19 inpatients in Wuhan. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146(1):110-118.
  6. Li YK, Peng S, Li LQ, et al. Clinical and transmission characteristics of Covid-19 -a retrospective study of 25 cases from a single thoracic surgery department. Curr Med Sci. 2020;40(2):295-300.
  7. Mo P, Xing Y, Xiao Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of refractory COVID- 19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ ciaa270. · DOI
  8. Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, et al. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ ciaa248. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Wang R, Pan M, Zhang X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of 125 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Fuyang, Anhui, China. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;95:421-428.
  10. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill pa- tients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:475-81.
  11. Zhang JJ, Dong X, Cao YY, et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients in- fected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy. 2020;75(7):1730-1741.
  12. Chow N, Fleming-Dutra K, Gierke R, et al.; CDC Covid-Response Team. Preliminary estimates of the prevalence of selected underlying health conditions among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 -United States, February 12-March 28, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(13):382-386.
  13. Hu L, Chen S, Fu Y, et al. Risk factors associated with clinical outcomes in 323 COVID-19 hospitalized patients in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa539. · DOI
  14. Liu J, Li S, Liu J, et al. Longitudinal characteristics of lymphocyte re- sponses and cytokine profiles in the peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2 in- fected patients. EBioMedicine. 2020;55:102763.
  15. Ji D, Zhang D, Xu J, et al. Prediction for progression risk in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: The CALL score. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa414. · DOI
  16. Shi Y, Yu X, Zhao H, Wang H, Zhao R, Sheng J. Host susceptibility to severe COVID-19 and establishment of a host risk score: Findings of 487 cases outside Wuhan. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):108.
  17. Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020;368:m1091.
  18. Wang K, Zuo P, Liu Y, et al. Clinical and laboratory predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19: a cohort study in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa538. · DOI
  19. Liu W, Tao ZW, Lei W, et al. Analysis of factors associated with disease outcomes in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(9):1032-1038.
  20. Berlin I, Thomas D, Le Faou AL, Cornuz J. COVID-19 and smoking. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22(9):1650-1652.

Authors
Karanasos, A., Aznaouridis, K., Latsios, G., Synetos, A., Plitaria, S., Tousoulis, D., & Toutouzas, K.
Affiliations
  • First Department of Cardiology, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Toutouzas, Konstantinos
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2020-06-20
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1657-1659
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W3036134447
Cited by
95
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 17
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, smoking, disease severity, mortality, hospitalized patients, risk factors, intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, case fatality, tobacco use, hospitalized adults, critical illness, refractory disease, study quality, risk of bias, publication bias, heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, smoking cessation, SARS-CoV-2, tobacco control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review