Cited by 21Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesStress and Burnout Research

Does avoidant coping influence young adults׳ smoking? A ten-year longitudinal study

Open access
Bricker, J. B., Schiff, L., Comstock, B. A.·2011·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Young adults who avoid their emotions may be at risk for starting smoking or not quitting smoking. This study investigated whether a preliminary measure of avoidant coping longitudinally predicts young adults' smoking escalation and cessation. METHODS: In a sample of the 3,305 participants, originally from Washington State, a preliminary measure of self-reported avoidant coping at age 18 was used to predict both smoking escalation and cessation at ages 20 and 28 with both probability and logistic regression models (10-year retention: 98.5%). RESULTS: Individuals who scored high on avoidant coping at 18 were 2.52 (p = .001) times more likely to acquire smoking by 20. However, there was no evidence that avoidant coping at age 18 predicted smoking escalation at 28 or cessation for 20- and 28-year-olds. CONCLUSIONS: An avoidant coping style may have a short-term effect on young adults' smoking acquisition. Future research using a precise and well-validated measure of avoidant coping is now needed to test this possibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntr074

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research indicates that psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance relate to problematic substance use and to a variety of other addictive behaviors.

    “Previous research has indicated that psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance relate to problematic substance use (e.g., Bricker, Schiff & Comstock, 2011; Levin et al., 2012) as well as a variety of other addictive behaviors (e.g., Kingston et al., 2010)”

    From Examining psychological inflexibility as a transdiagnostic process across psychological disorders (2014) · cites this paper as Bricker, Schiff & Comstock, 2011

    The Results report that higher avoidant coping at age 18 was associated with greater odds of smoking escalation by age 20. This supports a relationship with tobacco use, but the paper measured a preliminary avoidant-coping construct, not psychological inflexibility or experiential avoidance directly, and did not establish a relationship across substance use generally. The citation to other addictive behaviors is attached to a different source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation—United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports. 2009;58:1227–1232. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Krohne HW, Egloff B. Vigilant and avoidant coping: Theory and measurement. In: Spielberg CD, Sarason RC, editors. Stress and emotion: Anxiety, anger, and curiosity. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC; 2005. pp. 97–113. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bricker, J. B., Schiff, L., & Comstock, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2011-05-04
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
998-1002
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2137627609
Cited by
21
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Washington State University
  • Killam Trusts
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA082569, R01CA109652)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
avoidance coping, young adults, smoking initiation, smoking cessation, emotion avoidance, longitudinal prediction
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personality Disorders, Smoking, Stress, Psychological, Washington, Logistic Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Smoking Cessation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review