Cited by 104

Determination of Nicotine Absorption from Multiple Tobacco Products and Nicotine Gum

Digard, H., Proctor, C., Kulasekaran, A., Malmqvist, U., Richter, A.·2013·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/nts123

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mean nicotine Cmax measured during use of the 8 mg NP (15.4 ng/mL) was within the range reported in published literature for cigarettes (11.8 to 23 ng/mL) and MST products (10.6 to 21.4 ng/ml).

    “the mean nicotine Cmax measured during use of the 8 mg NP (15.4 ng/mL) was within the range reported in published literature”

    From Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective responses after using nicotine pouches with different nicotine levels compared to combustible cigarettes and moist smokeless tobacco in adult tobacco users (2022) · cites this paper as Digard et al. 2013

    Table 3 (Results, Nicotine Pharmacokinetics; page unavailable) reports snus Cmax values of 10.8–17.9 ng/mL, a range that includes the citing study’s 15.4 ng/mL value. It reports only one cigarette Cmax, 12.8 ng/mL, and does not give the quoted cigarette or MST ranges of 11.8–23 and 10.6–21.4 ng/mL. The source therefore supports the snus comparison, but not the specific literature ranges attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A 60-min usage time was selected based on prior snus pouch nicotine pharmacokinetic studies that had a 60-min mouth hold time based on product use data.

    “In this study, a 60-min usage time was selected based on prior snus pouch nicotine pharmacokinetic studies that had a 60-min mouth hold time based on product use data [24, 25].”
  • Previous studies have reported greater AUC and Cmax values for some types of snus than for cigarettes, probably due to the longer period of snus use relative to smoking a single cigarette.

    “previous studies have similarly reported greater AUC and Cmax values for some types of snus than for cigarettes [25–27], probably due to the longer period of snus use relative to smoking a single cigarette.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Andersson G Bjornberg G Curvall M Oral mucosal changes and nicotine disposition in users of Swedish smokeless tobacco products: A comparative study Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine 1994 23 161 167 doi:org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1994.tb01106.x 8046653 · DOI
  2. Benowitz NL Porchet H Sheiner L Jacob P Nicotine absorption and cardiovascular effects with smokeless tobacco use: Comparison with cigarettes and nicotine gum Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 1988 44 23 28 doi:org/10.1038/clpt.1988.107 3391001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Britton J Should doctors advocate snus and other nicotine replacements? Yes British Medical Journal 2008 336 358 doi:org/10.1136/bmj.39479.427477.AD 18276710 PMC2244727 · DOI
  4. Digard H Errington G Richter A McAdam K Patterns and behaviors of snus consumption in Sweden Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2009 11 1175 1181 doi:org/10.1093/ntr/ntp118 19687306 PMC2746836 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Foulds J Ramstrom L Burke M Fagerström K Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden Tobacco Control 2003 12 349 359 doi:org/10.1136/tc.12.4.349 14660766 PMC1747791 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Haberl M Anwald B Klein K Weil R Fuss C Gepdiremen A Three haplotypes associated with CYP2A6 phenotypes in Caucasians Pharmacogenetics and Genomics 2005 15 609 624 doi:org/10.1097/01.fpc.0000171517.22258.f1 16041240 · DOI
  7. Lunell E Curvall M Nicotine delivery and subjective effects of Swedish portion snus compared with 4 mg nicotine polacrilex chewing gum Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2011 13 573 578 doi:org/10.1093/ntr/ntr044 21454913 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lunell E Lunell M Steady-state nicotine plasma levels following use of four different types of Swedish snus compared with 2-mg nicorette chewing gum: A crossover study Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2005 7 397 403 doi:org/10.1080/14622200500125468 16085507 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Omvik P How smoking affects blood pressure Blood Pressure 1996 5 71 77 doi:10.3109/08037059609062111 9162447 · DOI
  10. Robertson D Tseng CJ Appalsamy M Smoking and mechanisms of cardiovascular control American Heart Journal 1998 115 258 263 doi:10.1016/0002-8703(88)90646-1 3276114 · DOI
  11. Russell MA Jarvis MJ Feyerabend C Ferno O Nasal nicotine solution: A potential aid to giving up smoking? British Medical Journal 1983 286 683 684 doi:org/10.1136/bmj.286.6366.683 6402202 PMC1547064 · DOI
  12. Schoedel KA Hoffmann EB Rao Y Sellers EM Tyndale RF Ethnic variation in CYP2A6 and association of genetically slow nicotine metabolism and smoking in adult Caucasians Pharmacogenetics 2004 14 615 626 doi:org/10.1097/00008571-200409000-00006 15475735 · DOI
  13. Sobue S Sekiguchi K Kikkawa H Akasaki M Irie S Comparison of nicotine pharmacokinetics in healthy Japanese male smokers following application of the transdermal nicotine patch and cigarette smoking Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 2006 29 1068 1073 doi:org/10.1248/bpb.29.1068 16651750 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Digard, H., Proctor, C., Kulasekaran, A., Malmqvist, U., & Richter, A.
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2012-05-13
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
255-261
ISSN
  • 1462-2203
  • 1469-994X
Cited by
104
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review