Cited by 619Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology

Nicotine absorption and cardiovascular effects with smokeless tobacco use: Comparison with cigarettes and nicotine gum

Benowitz, Neal L, Porchet, Herve, Sheiner, Lewis, Jacob, Peyton·1988·Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Abstract

Because of recent resurgence in its consumption, the effects and health consequences of smokeless tobacco are of considerable public health interest. We studied the extent and time course of absorption of nicotine and cardiovascular effects of smokeless tobacco (oral snuff and chewing tobacco) and compared it with smoking cigarettes and chewing nicotine gum in 10 healthy volunteers. Maximum levels of nicotine were similar but, because of prolonged absorption, overall nicotine exposure was twice as large after single exposures to smokeless tobacco compared with cigarette smoking. All tobacco use increased heart rate and blood pressure, with a tendency toward a greater overall cardiovascular effect despite evidence of development of some tolerance to effects of nicotine with use of smokeless tobacco. Relatively low levels of nicotine and lesser cardiovascular responses were observed with use of nicotine gum. Adverse health consequences of smoking that are nicotine related would be expected to present a similar hazard with the use of smokeless tobacco.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.1988.107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benowitz, N. L., Porchet, H., Sheiner, L., & Jacob, P.
Affiliations
San Francisco General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Benowitz, Neal L
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-07
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
23-28
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2061961563
Cited by
619
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA02277, DA-01696)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA32389)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
Keywords
smokeless tobacco, nicotine absorption, oral snuff, chewing tobacco, nicotine gum, cigarette smoking, cardiovascular effects, heart rate, blood pressure, nicotine tolerance, nicotine exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Chewing Gum, Drug Tolerance, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nicotine, Plants, Toxic, Smoking, Nicotiana, Tobacco, Smokeless

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review