Cited by 11Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Characterization of long-term users of nicotine replacement therapy: evidence from a national survey

Open access
Silla, K., Beard, E., Shahab, L.·2014·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Harm reduction involving partial or complete substitution of cigarettes with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is likely to benefit smokers by reducing exposure to carcinogens and by increasing the likelihood of permanent cessation. This article aimed to assess the determinants of short- and long-term NRT use for harm reduction in order to inform interventions aimed at helping smokers struggling to quit to switch to complete NRT substitution. METHODS: Data were used from the Smoking Toolkit Study, a population-based survey of adults in England aged 16 years and older (n = 9,224). Participants were asked about their sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco use. Attitudes toward smoking were also assessed using questions covering 4 factors: motives, identity, evaluations, and plans. RESULTS: Concurrent short-term (<3 months) and long-term (≥ 3 months) NRT use was uncommon among smokers at 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.1-11.4) and 5.0% (95% CI = 4.6-5.4), respectively. Long-term NRT users had higher odds of being older, in nonmanual occupations, and more addicted than smokers with short-term or no NRT use (all p < .01). They reported lower odds of attempting to stop and higher odds of exhibiting a positive smoker identity than short-term users (p < .001). Conversely, long-term NRT users had higher odds of having made a recent quit attempt, to have plans to stop, and lower odds of a positive smoker identity than smokers not using NRT (all p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: While users of NRT for harm-reduction purposes are a heterogeneous group, it appears they are more critical of smoking than never users and tend to positively modulate their behavior, setting them on a path toward cessation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntu019

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bridgman, K. (2010). Long-term use of NRT: International Experience. FDA Workshop on long-term use of NRT . Retrieved June 26, 2012, from http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/NewsEvents/UCM232330.pdf.
  2. Miller, N., Frieden, T.R., Liu, S.Y., Matte, T.D., Mostashari, F., Deitcher, D.R., Cummings, K.M., Chang, C., Bauer, U., and Bassett, M.T. (2005). Effectiveness of a large-scale free nicotine patch distribution program. The Lancet, 365 , 1849-1854. doi:10.1016/S01406736(05)66615-9.x · DOI
  3. Ritchie, J., Spencer, L., and O'Connor, W. (2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In J. Ritchie and J. Lewis (eds). Qualitative Research Practice . (pp. 219-262). London: Sage Publications.
  4. Shahab, L., Hammond, D., Borland, R, Cummings, K.M., West, R. & McNeill, A. (2009). The impact of relaxing NRT licensing laws in the UK: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Addiction, 104 , 1420-1427. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1360-0443. · DOI
  5. Shiffman, S., Rolf, C. N., Hellebusch, S. J., Gorsline, J., Gorodetsky, C. W., Chiang, Y-K., Schleusener, D. S., & Di Marino, M. E. (2002). Real-world efficacy of prescription and overthe counter Nicotine Replacement Therapy. Addiction , 97 , 505-516. doi:10.1046/j.13600443.2002.00141.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silla, K., Beard, E., & Shahab, L.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2014-03-07
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
1050-1055
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2145862733
Cited by
11
References
33
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (14135)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023195/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
nicotine replacement therapy, harm reduction, smoking cessation, smoking motivation, nicotine dependence, attitudes toward smoking, tobacco use
MeSH terms
Adult, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Nicotine, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation, Nicotinic Agonists, Harm Reduction, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review