Cited by 10Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Withdrawal symptoms from E-cigarette abstinence among adult never-smokers: a pilot experimental study

Open access
Hughes, John R, Peters, Erica N, Callas, Peter W, Peasley-Miklus, Catherine, Oga, Emmanuel, Etter, Jean-Francois, Morley, Nicholas·2020·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

Introduction: Use of e-cigarettes among never-smokers has substantially increased; yet there are few descriptions of the consequences of such use. We assessed whether adult never-smokers can have withdrawal from cessation of e-cigarettes. Methods: In an un-blinded pre-post clinical trial, 30 never-smoker daily e-cigarette users used their own nicotine-containing e-cigarette for 7 days followed by 6 days of biologically confirmed abstinence. Participants monitored symptoms of nicotine withdrawal nightly via an Interactive Voice Response system. They attended three lab visits/week to provide expired carbon monoxide and urine samples to determine compliance. Findings: Abstinence increased all the DSM5 symptoms of tobacco withdrawal and this occurred in the majority of participants. The increase in severity of withdrawal was small and rarely impaired functioning. Conclusions: Our finding suggests that withdrawal symptoms can occur in never-smokers who stop e-cigarettes abruptly. However, the severity of withdrawal appears to be small and may not be of clinical or regulatory significance. Although our sample size was small and thus replication tests of our results are indicated, it may be prudent to warn never-smokers that withdrawal symptoms may occur. Implications: This study indicates that withdrawal symptoms can occur in never-smokers who are daily e-cigarette users. However, the severity of withdrawal from e-cigarette abstinence in never-smokers appears to be small and may not be of clinical or regulatory significance. Given our small sample size, replication of our results is warranted. Nevertheless, it might be prudent to warn never-smokers of addiction to e-cigarettes. Clinical Trial Registration = NCT02825459

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntz169

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on e-cigarette withdrawal is limited, but recent analysis of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Survey and a clinical trial indicated that withdrawal symptoms were mild in never smokers.

    “There is limited research on withdrawal from e-cigarettes, but recent analysis of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Survey and a clinical trial by the same investgators indicated that withdrawal symptoms were mild in never smokers (Hughes & Callas, 2019; Hughes et al., 2020)”

    From Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain. (2020) · cites this paper as Hughes et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain.

    Leslie, F. M. (2020) · Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2020.173010 · Cited by 178 · see citing works

    “There is limited research on withdrawal from e-cigarettes, but recent analysis of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Survey and a clinical trial by the same investgators indicated that withdrawal symptoms were mild in never smokers (Hughes & Callas, 2019; Hughes et al., 2020), whereas another study of…”

Authors
Hughes, J. R., Peters, E. N., Callas, P. W., Peasley-Miklus, C., Oga, E., Etter, J.-F., & Morley, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Battelle (US)
  • Departments of Psychiatry and Psychological Science, Vermont Center for Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
  • Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Corresponding author
Hughes, John R
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2019-09-03
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
740-746
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2971730810
Cited by
10
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA-192940)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
electronic cigarettes, never smokers, nicotine withdrawal, abstinence, e-cigarette cessation, withdrawal symptoms, nicotine dependence, expired carbon monoxide, interactive voice response
MeSH terms
Smokers, Adult, Carbon Monoxide, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, United States, Health Behavior, Smoking Cessation, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review