The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Repeatability and validity of an upper limb and neck discomfort questionnaire: the utility of the standardized Nordic questionnaire
Abstract
The repeatability and validity of a questionnaire for upper limb and neck complaints were assessed in a population of 105 hospital outpatients with a range of upper limb and neck disorders (including cervical spondylosis, adhesive capsulitis, lateral epicondylitis, carpal tunnel syndrome and Raynaud's phenomenon). Subjects were asked to complete a modified Nordic-style upper limb and neck discomfort questionnaire on two occasions closely spaced in time. The repeatability of their responses was assessed by calculating a kappa coefficient (kappa), and the sensitivity and specificity of component items in the questionnaire were determined for specific diagnostic categories of upper limb and neck disorder. Symptom reports for pain in the upper limb and neck, pain interfering with physical activities, neurological symptoms and blanching were all found to be highly repeatable (kappa = 0.63-0.90). A number of regional pain reports proved to be very sensitive in relation to specific upper limb disorders, but, with the exception of reported finger blanching in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon, none proved to have a good specificity (range = 0.33-0.38). We conclude that a modified Nordic-style questionnaire is repeatable and sensitive, and is likely to have a high utility in screening and surveillance. However a complementary examination schedule of adequate specificity and repeatability is essential to establish a clinical diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature
Fejer, R., Kyvik, K. O., & Hartvigsen, J. (2006) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4 · Cited by 1,195
Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population
Walker‐Bone, K., Palmer, K. T., Reading, I., Coggon, D., & Cooper, C. (2004) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.20535 · Cited by 676
Self-citationThe Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire
Crawford, J. O. (2007) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm036 · Cited by 435
Østensvik, T., Veiersted, K. B., & Nilsen, P. (2009) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130903199889 · Cited by 52
Hagen, K., Linde, M., Steiner, T. J., Zwart, J. ‐., & Stovner, L. J. (2012) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03725.x · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, K., Smith, G., Kellingray, S., & Cooper, C.
- Venue
- Occupational Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171-175
- ISSN
- 0962-7480 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-8405
- OpenAlex
- W2119083163
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repeatability and validity of an upper limb and neck discomfort questionnaire: the utility of the standardized Nordic questionnaire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/occmed/49.3.171
- The paper
- Palmer, K., Smith, G., Kellingray, S., & Cooper, C. (1999). Repeatability and validity of an upper limb and neck discomfort questionnaire: the utility of the standardized Nordic questionnaire. Occupational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/49.3.171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.