Cited by 1,195Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMigraine and Headache StudiesCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy

The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature

Open access
Fejer, René, Kyvik, Kirsten Ohm, Hartvigsen, Jan·2006·European Spine Journal

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of neck pain (NP) in the world population and to identify areas of methodological variation between studies. A systematic search was conducted in five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, OSH-ROM, and PsycINFO), followed by a screening of reference lists of relevant papers. Included papers were extracted for information and each paper was given a quality score. Mean prevalence estimates were calculated for six prevalence periods (point, week, month, 6 months, year, and lifetime), and considered separately for age, gender, quality score, response rate, sample size, anatomical definition, geography, and publication year. Fifty-six papers were included. The six most commonly reported types of prevalence were point, week, month, 6 months, year, and lifetime. Except for lifetime prevalence, women reported more NP than men. For 1-year prevalence, Scandinavian countries reported more NP than the rest of Europe and Asia. Prevalence estimates were not affected by age, quality score, sample size, response rate, and different anatomical definitions of NP. NP is a common symptom in the population. As expected, the prevalence increases with longer prevalence periods and generally women have more NP than men. At least for 1-year prevalence Scandinavian countries report higher mean estimates than the rest of Europe and Asia. The quality of studies varies greatly but is not correlated with the prevalence estimates. Design varies considerably and standardisation is needed in future studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain is higher among women than men in community and treatment-seeking cohorts.

    “It is well known that the prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain is higher among women, both in community and treatment seeking cohorts [1–5].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [17]Chaiamnuay P, Darmawan J, Muirden KD, Assawatanabodee P. Epidemiology of rheumatic disease in rural Thailand: a WHO-ILAR COPCORD study. J Rheumatol. 1998;25:1382–1387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [18]Chopra A, Saluja M, Patil J, Tandale HS. Pain and disability, perceptions and beliefs of a rural Indian population: a WHO-ILAR COPCORD study. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:614–621. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [40]LeResche L. Gender considerations in the epidemiology of chronic pain. In: Crombie IK, Croft PR, Linton SJ, LeResche L, Korff M, editors. Epidemiology of pain. Seattle: IASP Press; 1999. pp. 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  4. [59]Stendig-Lindberg G. Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and its socio-demographic correlates in an urban Israeli population sample. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;8:77–80. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fejer, R., Kyvik, K. O., & Hartvigsen, J.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Fejer, René
Venue
European Spine Journal
Published
2005-07-06
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
834-848
ISSN
  • 0940-6719 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0932
OpenAlex
W2003095469
Cited by
1,195
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 46
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Spine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Keywords
neck pain, prevalence, lifetime prevalence, point prevalence, sex differences, regional variation, study quality, methodological variability
MeSH terms
Asia, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, North America, Scandinavian and Nordic Countries, Databases, Bibliographic, MEDLINE, Neck Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review