Cited by 25Migraine and Headache StudiesFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The bidirectional relationship between headache and chronic musculoskeletal complaints: an 11‐year follow‐up in the N ord‐T røndelag H ealth S tudy (HUNT)

Hagen, K., Linde, M., Steiner, T. J., Zwart, J.‐A., Stovner, L. J.·2012·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic daily headache (CDH) and chronic musculoskeletal complaints (CMSCs) are associated disorders, but whether there is a causal relationship between them is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CMSCs are associated with the subsequent development of CDH and vice versa. METHODS: This longitudinal population-based cohort study used data from two consecutive surveys in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 2 and 3) performed in 1995-1997 and 2006-2008. Amongst the 51 383 participants aged ≥ 20 years at baseline, 41 766 were eligible approximately 11 years later. Of these, 26 197 (63%) completed the questions regarding headache and CMSCs in HUNT 3. RESULTS: A bidirectional relationship was found between headache and CMSCs. In the multivariate analyses adjusting for known potential confounders, a nearly two fold risk (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.5-2.3) for developing CDH was found for those with CMSCs at baseline. Vice versa, a similarly elevated risk of CMSCs (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2-2.6), and even higher risk of chronic widespread MSCs (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.6-4.7), was found at follow-up amongst those with CDH at baseline. CONCLUSION: CMSCs predispose to CDH and CDH predisposes to CMSCs 11 years later. This may have relevance to understanding the pathophysiology of these disorders. CMSCs should be treated not only to relieve them but also to prevent the development of CDH, and vice versa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03725.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagen, K., Linde, M., Steiner, T. J., Zwart, J. ‐., & Stovner, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Hagen, K.
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
1447-1454
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W2017573567
Cited by
25
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic daily headache, bidirectional relationship, chronic widespread pain, headache pathophysiology, headache prevention, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study
MeSH terms
Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Headache Disorders, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review