Cited by 238Healthcare Systems and ChallengesCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Physician deaths from corona virus (COVID-19) disease

Open access
Ing, E B, Xu, Q (A), Salimi, A, Torun, N·2020·Occupational Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused much morbidity and mortality to patients but also health care providers. Aims: We tabulated the cases of physician deaths from COVID-19 associated with front-line work in hopes of mitigating future events. Methods: On 15 April 2020, a Google internet search was performed using the keywords ‘doctor’, ‘physician’, ‘death’, ‘COVID’ and ‘coronavirus’ in English and Farsi, and Chinese using the Baidu search engine. The age, sex and medical speciality of physicians who died from COVID-19 in the line of duty were recorded. Individuals greater than 90 years of age were excluded. Results: We found 278 physicians who died with COVID-19 infection, but complete details were missing for 108 individuals. The average age of the physicians was 63.7 years with a median age of 66 years, and 90% were male (235/261). General practitioners and emergency room doctors (108/254), respirologists (5/254), internal medicine specialists (13/254) and anaesthesiologists (6/254) comprised 52% of those dying. Two per cent of the deceased were epidemiologists (5/254), 2% were infectious disease specialists (4/254), 6% were dentists (16/254), 4% were ENT (9/254) and 3% were ophthalmologists (8/254). The countries with the most reported physician deaths were Italy (121/278; 44%), Iran (43/278; 15%), Philippines (21/278; 8%), Indonesia (17/278; 6%), China (16/278; 6%), Spain (12/278; 4%), USA (12/278; 4%) and UK (11/278;4%). Conclusions: Physicians from all specialities may die from COVID. Lack of personal protective equipment was cited as a common cause of death. Consideration should be made to exclude older physicians from front-line work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/occmed/kqaa088

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nacoti M, Ciocca A, Giupponi A et al. NEJM Catalyst. At the Epicenter of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Humanitarian Crises in Italy: Changing Perspectives on Preparation and Mitigation [Online]. 2020. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/ full/10.1056/CAT.20.0080 (24 March 2020, date last accessed). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ing, E. B., Xu, Q. (., Salimi, A., & Torun, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ing, E B
Venue
Occupational Medicine
Published
2020-05-15
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
370-374
ISSN
  • 0962-7480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8405
OpenAlex
W3025090567
Cited by
238
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 74
FWCI
55.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Occupational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, physician death, occupational exposure, personal protective equipment, general practitioners, medical specialties, age and sex distribution, older physicians
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review