Cited by 158Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

Systematic review: factors contributing to burnout in dentistry

Singh, P., Aulak, D. S., Mangat, S. S., Aulak, M. S.·2016·Occupational Medicine

Abstract

Background Dentists and dental students have been reported to be at high risk of burnout and risk factors have been identified. Despite research into burnout in dentists, only a few papers have identified significantly associated factors. Aims To identify the most significant factors associated with burnout in dentists and dental students in published literature. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and HMIC electronic databases to source literature on the factors associated with burnout in dentists. We critically appraised and themed papers using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme to find the most significant factors. Results From 115 studies identified by the search string, we deemed 33 papers to be relevant for review. The most prevalent and significant factors associated with burnout were: younger age, male gender, student status, high job-strain/working hours, those enrolled in clinical degree programmes and certain personality types. However, only a limited amount of literature explored the directional relationship between these factors and burnout. Conclusions This review identified several significant factors contributing to burnout in dentists and dental students. Further longitudinal and prospective studies are required to assess causation. Burnout should be considered a multifactorial phenomenon that can develop early in a dental career. Screening programmes and coping strategies might help to identify and prevent it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/occmed/kqv119

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, P., Aulak, D. S., Mangat, S. S., & Aulak, M. S.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Kingston University London (GB)
Venue
Occupational Medicine
Published
2015-10-05
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
27-31
ISSN
  • 0962-7480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8405
OpenAlex
W2283295852
Cited by
158
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Occupational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
burnout, dentists, dental students, risk factors, job strain, working hours, personality, gender differences, age, occupational stress, burnout screening, coping strategies
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Dentistry, Dentists, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Personality, Students, Dental, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review