Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

C-Reactive Protein Level May Predict the Risk of COVID-19 Aggravation

Open access
Wang, Guyi, Wu, Chenfang, Zhang, Quan, Wu, Fang, Yu, Bo, Lv, Jianlei, Li, Yiming, Li, Tiao, Zhang, Siye, Wu, Chao, Wu, Guobao, Zhong, Yanjun·2020·Open Forum Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: Clinical findings indicated that a fraction of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients diagnosed as mild early may progress to severe cases. However, it is difficult to distinguish these patients in the early stage. The present study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of these patients, analyze related factors, and explore predictive markers of the disease aggravation. Methods: Clinical and laboratory data of nonsevere adult COVID-19 patients in Changsha, China, were collected and analyzed on admission. A logistic regression model was adopted to analyze the association between the disease aggravation and related factors. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was utilized to analyze the prognostic ability of C-reactive protein (CRP). Results: About 7.7% (16/209) of nonsevere adult COVID-19 patients progressed to severe cases after admission. Compared with nonsevere patients, the aggravated patients had much higher levels of CRP (median [range], 43.8 [12.3–101.9] mg/L vs 12.1 [0.1–91.4] mg/L; P = .000). A regression analysis showed that CRP was significantly associated with aggravation of nonsevere COVID-19 patients, with an area under the curve of 0.844 (95% confidence interval, 0.761–0.926) and an optimal threshold value of 26.9 mg/L. Conclusions: CRP could be a valuable marker to anticipate the possibility of aggravation of nonsevere adult COVID-19 patients, with an optimal threshold value of 26.9 mg/L.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ofid/ofaa153

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Wang, G., Wu, C., Zhang, Q., Wu, F., Yu, B., Lv, J., Li, Y., Li, T., Zhang, S., Wu, C., Wu, G., & Zhong, Y.
Venue
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-04-29
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
ofaa153-ofaa153
ISSN
2328-8957 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3017944572
Cited by
286
References
4
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: C-Reactive Protein Level May Predict the Risk of COVID-19 Aggravation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ofid/ofaa153
The paper
Wang, G., Wu, C., Zhang, Q., Wu, F., Yu, B., Lv, J., Li, Y., Li, T., Zhang, S., Wu, C., Wu, G., & Zhong, Y. (2020). C-Reactive Protein Level May Predict the Risk of COVID-19 Aggravation. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa153

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.