The DOI matches its Crossref record.
147. Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Novel Antifungal, Fosmanogepix, in the Treatment of Candidemia: Results from a Phase 2 Proof of Concept Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background: Fosmanogepix (FMGX) is a first-in-class antifungal agent, with a unique MOA targeting the fungal enzyme Gwt1, that has broad-spectrum activity against both yeasts, molds, and dimorphic fungi, including fungi resistant to other antifungal agents. FMGX has a favorable safety profile, reduced potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions, and is formulated for IV and oral administration. Methods: This global, multicenter, open-label, non-comparative study evaluated the safety and efficacy of FMGX for first-line treatment of candidemia. Patients with a recent diagnosis of candidemia defined as positive blood culture for Candida spp. within 96 hrs prior to study entry, with ≤2 days of prior antifungal treatment were eligible. Patients with neutropenia, C. krusei infection, or deep-seated Candida infections were excluded. Patients were treated with FMGX for up to 14 days: 1000 mg IV BID for 1 day, then 600 mg IV QD for at least 2 days, followed by either 600 mg IV QD or 700 mg PO QD. Short-term fluconazole (or appropriate alternative) could follow if treatment was required beyond 14 days. Patients with a diagnosis of candidemia within 96 hrs of start of study drug who received at least 1 dose of FMGX were included in the mITT population. The primary efficacy endpoint was outcome at end of study treatment (EOST) as determined by an independent data review committee (DRC). Successful outcome was defined as clearance of Candida from blood cultures with no additional antifungal treatment and survival at EOST. All Candida isolates were tested for antifungal susceptibility. Results: A total of 21 subjects were enrolled in the study: 20 were included in the mITT. Median duration of FMGX was 11 days (range 5–14). All subjects received IV FMGX, 48% (10/21) received PO FMGX. The DRC-assessed success rate at EOST was 80% (16/20). Survival at day 30 was 85% (17/20); 3 deaths were not related FMGX. FMGX was well-tolerated with no treatment-related serious adverse events or discontinuations. FMGX had potent in vitro activity against all study Candida spp. (EUCAST MIC range 0.001–0.03 µg/ml) including those resistant to other antifungal agents. Conclusion: FMGX was safe, well-tolerated, and demonstrated proof of concept with a high level of treatment success in patients with candidemia. Disclosures: Peter Pappas, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support) Bart Jan Kullberg, MD, FRCP, FIDSA, Amplyx (Advisor or Review Panel member) Galia Rahav, MD, AstraZeneca (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Mickaël Aoun, MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Pierre Bulpa, MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Ricard Ferrer, MD, PhD, Shionogi B.V. (Advisor or Review Panel member) Todd P. McCarty, MD, Amplyx (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Cidara (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Sara Barbat, BSN, RN, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Pamela Wedel, BSc, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Iwonka Oborska, PhD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Consultant, Independent Contractor) Haran T. Schlamm, MD, Amplyx (Consultant) Michael Hodges, BSc. MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Employee)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a Phase 2 study in 20 patients with invasive candidiasis, FMGX was safe and well-tolerated.
“In a Phase 2 study in 20 patients with invasive candidiasis, FMGX was safe, well-tolerated, and demonstrated a high treatment success rate of 80% at end of study treatment (EOST) and Day 30 survival of 85% (26).”
From Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Antifungal, Fosmanogepix, in Patients with Candidemia Caused by Candida auris : Results from a Phase 2 Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
In that Phase 2 study, Day 30 survival was 85%.
“In a Phase 2 study in 20 patients with invasive candidiasis, FMGX was safe, well-tolerated, and demonstrated a high treatment success rate of 80% at end of study treatment (EOST) and Day 30 survival of 85% (26).”
From Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Antifungal, Fosmanogepix, in Patients with Candidemia Caused by Candida auris : Results from a Phase 2 Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
In that Phase 2 study, FMGX demonstrated a treatment success rate of 80% at EOST.
“In a Phase 2 study in 20 patients with invasive candidiasis, FMGX was safe, well-tolerated, and demonstrated a high treatment success rate of 80% at end of study treatment (EOST) and Day 30 survival of 85% (26).”
From Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Antifungal, Fosmanogepix, in Patients with Candidemia Caused by Candida auris : Results from a Phase 2 Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Antifungal Pipeline: Fosmanogepix, Ibrexafungerp, Olorofim, Opelconazole, and Rezafungin
Hoenigl, M., Sprute, R., Egger, M., Arastehfar, A., Cornely, O. A., Krause, R., Lass-Flörl, C., Prattes, J., Spec, A., Thompson, G. R., et al. (2021) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-021-01611-0 · Cited by 467
Vazquez, J. A., Pappas, P. G., Boffard, K., Paruk, F., Bien, P. A., Tawadrous, M., Ople, E., Wedel, P., Oborska, I., & Hodges, M. R. (2023) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01419-22 · Cited by 92
Self-citationAntifungals in Clinical Use and the Pipeline
Johnson, M. D. (2021) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2021.03.005 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Pappas, P., Kullberg, B. J., Vazquez, J. A., Oren, I., Rahav, G., Aoun, M., Bulpa, P., Ben-Ami, R., Ferrer, R., McCarty, T. P., Thompson III, G. R., Barbat, S., Wedel, P., Oborska, I., Schlamm, H. T., & Hodges, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
- RHCC, Kiryat Motzkin, Hefa, Israel
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Institut Jules Bordet (BE)
- Mont-Godinne University Hospital, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Namur, Belgium
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
- UC-Davis, Sacramento, California
- Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
- Amplyx, Horsham, England, United Kingdom
- Amplyx Inc, Rancho Santa Fe, California
- ORCID
- Venue
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-10-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- Pages
- S203-S204
- ISSN
- 2328-8957 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7777973
- OpenAlex
- W3120040705
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Keywords
- fosmanogepix, candidemia, Candida, antifungal agents, treatment safety, antifungal susceptibility, fluconazole
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review