Cited by 30Reproductive tract infections researchLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGynecological conditions and treatments

Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the neovagina in transgender women.

Open access
Radix, Asa E, Harris, Alexander B, Belkind, Uri, Ting, Jess, Goldstein, Zil G·2019·Open Forum Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Abstract We report two cases of neovaginal Chlamydia trachomatis infection in transgender women who underwent penile-inversion vaginoplasty procedures with integrated peritoneum and urethral grafts. These tissue types may have facilitated C. trachomatis infection. Medical providers should implement neovaginal screening for bacterial STIs in transgender patients at risk for infection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ofid/ofz470

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neovaginal STIs have infrequently been reported and include HSV and HPV/genital warts in penile-inversion vaginoplasty, C. trachomatis in procedures that involved penile skin and grafts with urethra mucosa or abdominal peritoneal lining, and N. gonorrhoeae in both penile-inversion and colovaginoplasty.

    “Neovaginal STIs have infrequently been reported in the literature and include HSV and HPV/genital warts in penile-inversion vaginoplasty, C. trachomatis in procedures that involved penile skin and grafts with urethra mucosa or abdominal peritoneal lining (353), and N. gonorrhoeae in both penile-inversion and colovaginoplasty (354–359).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [353]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radix, A. E., Harris, A. B., Belkind, U., Ting, J., & Goldstein, Z. G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Medicine Callen-Lorde Community Health Center, New York, USA
  • Department of Research and Education Callen-Lorde Community Health Center, New York, USA
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Radix, Asa E
Venue
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2019-11-11
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
ofz470-ofz470
ISSN
2328-8957 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987345221
Cited by
30
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
Chlamydia trachomatis, neovagina, transgender women, penile inversion vaginoplasty, peritoneal graft, bacterial sexually transmitted infections, surgical site infection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review