Cited by 11Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsFrailty in Older AdultsTechnology Use by Older Adults

The use of wearable technology in studies in older adults with cancer: a systematic review

Open access
Duin, Jan J, Baltussen, Joosje C, Albalak, Gali, van Dam van Isselt, Eléonore F, Portielje, Johanneke E A, Mooijaart, Simon P, Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Enrique, van den Bos, Frederiek·2025·The Oncologist

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing integration of wearable technology in oncology, its application in the care of older adults, representing most patients with cancer, is poorly defined. Objective: This systematic review aimed to summarize the current use of wearables in studies in older adults with cancer. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on May 1, 2024. Studies involving wearable devices and patients aged ≥60 years diagnosed with cancer were included. Outcomes reported were study characteristics, wearable outcomes, feasibility and adherence. The mixed method appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. Results: A total of 31 publications were included, comprising 1298 older patients. Of these, 12 were pilot/feasibility studies, 12 were observational studies, 6 were randomized controlled trials, and 1 was a cross-sectional study. Most studies used wearable data to measure recovery (19 studies, 61%). Physical activity was the most studied wearable outcome (27 studies, 87%). Adherence to the wearable device was documented in 11 of the 31 studies (35%), with adherence ranging from 74% to 100%. Conclusions: Our systematic review found wearables were mostly used to measure physical activity, with the most common primary aim of measuring recovery. Most studies reported high adherence, although definitions of adherence were diverse. Our results highlight the need for more and larger studies on wearable technology in older cancer patients, the use of standardized reporting frameworks, and increased participation in research in low- and middle-income countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oncolo/oyae319

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]12. Abad LC, De Villaumbrosia CG, Miranda C, et al Monitoring physical activity of older adults with hematological malignancies. The importance of conducting an individualized follow-up program to prevent functional impairment. HemaSphere. 2022; 6: 4018- 4019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duin, J. J., Baltussen, J. C., Albalak, G., van Dam van Isselt, E. F., Portielje, J. E. A., Mooijaart, S. P., Soto-Perez-de-Celis, E., & van den Bos, F.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center , 2300 RC Leiden ,
  • Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán , 14080 Mexico City ,
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Leiden University Medical Center , 2300 RC Leiden ,
Corresponding author
Duin, Jan J
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2024-11-20
Volume
30
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W4404558488
Cited by
11
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Oncologist (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Universiteit Leiden
  • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
wearable devices, older adults, cancer, physical activity, recovery, feasibility, research participation, low- and middle-income countries
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review