Feminist Whiteness
Open accessAbstract
This chapter focuses on feminist whiteness, a concept it introduces and defines as the product of a process of political subjectivation as a white feminist. The concept captures the various repertoires that white feminists elaborate to talk about—or rather actively ignore—race relations of power and their own privileged positions in this racial order. The chapter traces how white feminists are constituted as political subjects through their relationship to nonwhite feminists, and to those whom they perceive and label as “bad” feminist subjects. It shows that debates on Islamic veiling have operated a shift in feminist whiteness, from feminist whiteness as ignorance to feminist whiteness as an active participation in national identity and femonationalist discourses. It also shows that feminist whiteness is multiple and varies across contexts. In France and Quebec, white feminists use different repertoires to address race issues. Some work around or evade race, while others recognize its political salience. These different forms of feminist whiteness are articulated with specific moral dispositions and emotions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When minoritized women express their demands, racialized and trans women encounter condescending attitudes, acts of patronizing solicitude in which they are seen as vulnerable and as victims in need of help.
“when minoritized women express their demands, racialized and trans women explain that they encounter condescending attitudes, that is, acts of patronizing solicitude (Lépinard, 2020) in which they are seen as vulnerable and as victims in need of help (I.9,I.15, and I.21).”
From Intersectional power struggles in feminist movements: An analysis of resistance and counter‐resistance to intersectionality (2024) · cites this paper as Lépinard, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 29,585 · see citing works
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445 · see citing works
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510 · see citing works
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center
Jackson, S. (1985) · Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies · doi:10.5070/f7143017029 · Cited by 4,441 · see citing works
Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/669608 · Cited by 4,126 · see citing works
Nash, J. C. (2008) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.2008.4 · Cited by 1,995 · see citing works
Purity, Impurity, and Separation
Lugones, M. (1994) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/494893 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Coalitions as a model for intersectionality: From practice to theory
Cole, E. R. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9419-1 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Razack, S. H. (2007) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-006-9050-x · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muñoz‐Puig, M. (2024) · Gender, Work & Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12995 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lépinard, É.
- Corresponding author
- Lépinard, Éléonore
- ORCID
- Lépinard, Éléonore
- Venue
- Feminist Trouble
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2020-04-01
- Pages
- 81-126
- OpenAlex
- W4250252177
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- white feminism, political subjectivation, race relations, racial privilege, femonationalism, national identity, moral dispositions, emotions, France, Quebec
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review