Cited by 1,995Feminist Theory and Gender StudiesFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality StudiesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Re-Thinking Intersectionality

Open access
Nash, Jennifer C.·2008·Feminist Review

Abstract

Black feminist and legal studies scholar Jennifer C. Nash asks us to think critically about what has become the discourse and theory most commonly connected to feminism: intersectionality. As Nash puts it, intersectionality is now “the primary analytic tool that feminist and anti-racist scholars deploy for theorizing identity and oppression” (2008, 1). Nash outlines the limits to what she describes as the murky theory of intersectionality, including (1) the lack of a defined intersectional methodology (that is, how we do intersectionality); (2) the use of Black women as quintessential intersectional subjects; and (3) the vague definition of intersectionality. While intersectionality often gets deployed to talk about an individual’s race, class, and gender—which is often reduced to identity—Nash says we need to move beyond such understandings so that we can focus on racism, classism, sexism, and other forms of marginalization as interrelated forms of structural oppression.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Nash interrogates the assumptions underlying intersectionality as a feminist and anti-racist analytic, arguing that four unresolved tensions leave the paradigm theoretically and methodologically murky. She frames the critique as a constructive invitation to strengthen intersectionality rather than to abandon it.

Key findings

  • Nash identifies four unresolved tensions in intersectionality scholarship: the absence of a clearly defined intersectional methodology, the treatment of black women as the quintessential intersectional subject, the vagueness of the term's definition, and the question of whether the theory matches lived experience.
  • She argues that intersectional work often reproduces the cumulative logic it criticizes: Crenshaw's anti-discrimination analysis, while showing that black women's injuries exceed race-or-gender categories, still treats black women's identities as constituted only by race and gender, leaving class, sexuality, nationality, and ethnicity largely unexamined.
  • The reliance on black women as a theoretical wedge treats them as a monolithic group and obscures differences among them; Nash also contends that intersectionality largely renames commitments already present in black feminism without specifying what new analytic tools it adds.
  • She notes an unresolved dispute over scope — whether all identities are intersectional or only multiply marginalized ones — citing Kwan's observation that straight white male identity would likely be resisted as intersectional, against Zack's claim that all women are intersectional subjects.
  • Nash calls for attention to how privilege and oppression are co-constituted within a single subject, and for treating race and gender as distinct, historically specific processes rather than as inextricably fused.

Methods

  • Conceptual and theoretical essay; no empirical data collection or sample. The argument proceeds through close reading and critique of key texts in intersectionality and critical race scholarship.
  • Draws on McCall's three intersectional methodologies — anticategorical, intracategorical, and intercategorical complexity — to show the gap between methodological prescription and actual intersectional practice.
  • Engages primarily with Crenshaw, alongside Wing, Williams, Matsuda, Kwan, Zack, Walcott, and Wacquant, to illustrate the paradoxes Nash identifies.

Limitations

  • Nash states explicitly that her aim is not to dismantle intersectionality but to expose its assumptions so scholars can build a more complex account of identity and oppression; she presents questions and challenges rather than a replacement framework.
  • Evident from the text: the critique rests on a limited set of canonical sources and offers no empirical test of the claims about lived experience, which Nash herself flags as an open question for the field.
  • Evident from the text: the essay diagnoses the missing methodology and theory of agency without supplying either, leaving the constructive program largely programmatic.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/fr.2008.4

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 50 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    Intersectionality treats black women as a unitary and monolithic entity.

    “First, while seeking to underscore problems of exclusion within feminist and anti-racist theory, black women are treated as a unitary and monolithic entity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1991 source

      In the Introduction (pp. 1–2), Crenshaw criticizes identity politics for ignoring differences within groups. She explicitly says intersectionality is not a totalizing theory of identity and calls for attention to class, sexuality, and other dimensions of experience. That contradicts the claim that her approach treats Black women as a unitary, monolithic group. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    Crenshaw's seminal analysis of black women's experiences of sexual assault and domestic violence neglects the ways these experiences are complicated by class, nationality, language, ethnicity, and sexuality.

    “For example, Crenshaw's seminal analysis of the ways in which black women's experiences of sexual assault and domestic violence are mediated by both race and gender neglects the ways in which these experiences are also complicated by class, nationality, language, ethnicity, and sexuality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1991 source

      The Introduction (pp. 1–2) says the analysis focuses on race and gender and acknowledges that sexuality receives limited or no treatment. But the Structural Intersectionality and Battering section (pp. 2–3) expressly analyzes class and explains how immigrant status and cultural barriers compound vulnerability to domestic violence. The claim that the paper neglects these dimensions is therefore contrary to our copy, even though its treatment of sexuality is limited. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    From its inception, intersectionality has had a long-standing interest in the intersection of race and gender.

    “From its inception, intersectionality has had a long-standing interest in one particular intersection: the intersection of race and gender.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1991 source
  • Premisecitation

    Intersectionality has become the primary analytic tool that feminist and anti-racist scholars deploy for theorizing identity and oppression.

    “Intersectionality has become the primary analytic tool that feminist and anti-racist scholars deploy for theorizing identity and oppression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCall, 2005 source
  • Interpretationreasoning

    While Crenshaw endeavours to use black women's incapacity to comply with race/gender categories to demonstrate the inadequacy of the categories themselves, her argument shores up the conception that black women's identities are constituted exclusively by race and gender.

    “While Crenshaw endeavours to use black women's incapacity to comply with race/ gender categories to demonstrate the inadequacy of the categories themselves, her argument shores up the conception that black women's identities are constituted exclusively by race and gender.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 48
  • May combine two claims. 25
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Intersectionality aspires to provide a vocabulary to respond to critiques of identity politics.

    “Second, intersectionality aspires to provide a vocabulary to respond to critiques of identity politics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1991 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Intersectionality rejects the 'single-axis framework' often embraced by both feminist and anti-racist scholars, instead analysing the various ways in which race and gender interact to shape the multiple dimensions of Black women's experiences.

    “intersectionality rejects the 'single-axis framework' often embraced by both feminist and anti-racist scholars, instead analysing 'y the various ways in which race and gender interact to shape the multiple dimensions of Black women's y experiences'”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1991 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Intersectionality invites scholars to come to terms with the legacy of exclusions of multiply marginalized subjects from feminist and anti-racist work, and the impact of those absences on both theory and practice.

    “Finally, intersectionality invites scholars to come to terms with the legacy of exclusions of multiply marginalized subjects from feminist and anti-racist work, and the impact of those absences on both theory and practice”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Crenshaw, 1991 source
    • cites Williams, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Crenshaw's articulation of intersectionality has galvanized an array of disciplines to consider questions of essentialism, exclusion, and complex identity in new ways.

    “Crenshaw's articulation of intersectionality has galvanized an array of disciplines to consider questions of essentialism, exclusion, and complex identity in new ways.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1991 source

      The Introduction (pp. 1–2) articulates intersectionality through the exclusion of women of color from single-axis accounts of race and gender, and calls for attention to multiple grounds of identity. It does not establish the claim that this articulation subsequently galvanized an array of disciplines. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    For Crenshaw, it is the fixed mutually exclusive categorizations of race and gender that marginalize black women.

    “For Crenshaw, it is the fixed mutually exclusive categorizations of race and gender that marginalize black women.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Chang and Culp's query suggests the necessity of assessing whether intersectionality describes lived experiences of identity, and developing methodological tools that are sufficiently flexible to attend to the myriad intersections that constitute identity.

    “Chang and Culp's query suggests the necessity of assessing whether intersectionality describes lived experiences of identity, and developing methodological tools that are sufficiently flexible to attend to the myriad intersections that constitute identity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Crenshaw focuses on black women because they are 'multiply burdened', yet her analysis precludes an examination of forms of 'multiple burdens' (or the intersections of privileges and burdens) beyond race and gender.

    “That is, Crenshaw focuses on black women because they are 'multiply burdened', yet her analysis precludes an examination of forms of 'multiple burdens' (or the intersections of privileges and burdens) beyond race and gender.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Crenshaw seeks to challenge law and radical critiques of law to attend to the 'intersectional experiences of those whom the movements claim as their respective constituents'.

    “Ultimately, Crenshaw seeks to challenge law and radical critiques of law (i.e.feminist legal theory, critical race theory) to attend to the 'intersectional experiences of those whom the movements claim as their respective constituents'”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These unresolved conflicts seep into feminist and anti-racist theory, practice, and politics, confusing their conceptions of identity and oppression, and obscuring the normative goals of their work.

    “These unresolved conflicts seep into feminist and anti-racist theory, practice, and politics, confusing their conceptions of identity and oppression, and obscuring the normative goals of their work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Only a regime that attends to the 'particular manner in which Black women are subordinated' can adequately redress black women's injuries.

    “Only a regime that attends to the 'particular manner in which Black women are subordinated' can adequately redress black women's injuries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Intersectionality has provided a name to a pre-existing theoretical and political commitment.

    “To that end, intersectionality has provided a name to a pre-existing theoretical and political commitment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Crenshaw argues that these projects must begin their analytic endeavours by attending to the most disadvantaged.

    “Rather than importing models from the regimes they seek to disrupt, Crenshaw argues that these projects must begin their analytic endeavours by attending to the most disadvantaged.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    While intersectionality has worked to disrupt cumulative approaches to identity and to problematize social processes of categorization through strategic deployments of marginalized subjects' experiences, intersectional projects often replicate precisely the approaches that they critique.

    “while intersectionality has worked to disrupt cumulative approaches to identity (i.e.race þ gender þ sexuality þ class¼complex identity), and to problematize social processes of categorization through strategic deployments of marginalized subjects' experiences, intersectional projects often replicate precisely the approaches that they critique.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wing argues that black women are more than 'multiply-burdened' entities subject to a multiplicity of oppression, discrimination, pain and depression, and that their essence is characterized by a multiplicity of strength, love, joy, and transcendence that flourishes despite adversity.

    “She argues: yI want to assert affirmatively to the legal academy and to ourselves as well, that we black women are more than 'multiply-burdened' entities subject to a multiplicity of oppression, discrimination, pain and depression.Our essence is also characterized by a multiplicity of strength, love, joy, (with a spin leap alive we're alive) and transcendence that flourishes despite adversity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wing, 1990 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With little attention to the role that sexuality, nationality, or class might play in mediating or entrenching black women's experiences of 'burdens', black women function exclusively as sites that demonstrate the importance of race-and-gender, rendering black women's experiences the aggregate of race and gender.

    “With little attention to the role that sexuality, nationality, or class, for example, might play in mediating or entrenching black women's experiences of 'burdens', black women function exclusively as sites that demonstrate the importance of race-and-gender, rendering black women's experiences the aggregate of race and gender.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Wing's use of poetry is not simply to explain the 'multiplicative' nature of black women's experiences; poetry also exemplifies black women's particular relationship with the creative.

    “Wing's use of poetry is not simply to explain the 'multiplicative' nature of black women's experiences; poetry also exemplifies black women's particular relationship with the creative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wing, 1990 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Crenshaw attacks the assumptions underpinning anti-discrimination law, arguing that black women are compelled to assert either race-based or gender-based discrimination claims instead of causes of action that reflect their positions as intersectional subjects.

    “Crenshaw attacks the assumptions underpinning anti-discrimination law, arguing that black women are compelled to assert either race-based or gender-based discrimination claims instead of causes of action, which reflect their positions as intersectional subjects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wing argues that black women can no longer afford to think of themselves or let the law think of them as merely the sum of separate parts, and that the actuality of their layered experience is multiplicative.

    “She argues, 'We, as black women, can no longer afford to think of ourselves or let the law think of us as merely the sum of separate parts y .The actuality of our layered experience is multiplicative.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wing, 1990 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Wing draws on E.E. Cummings' lines to argue that black women's experiences are 'multiplicative' or 'one times one'.

    “to argue that black women's experiences are 'multiplicative' or 'one times one'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wing, 1990 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A number of paradoxes embedded in intersectionality literature remain uninterrogated by feminist and anti-racist scholarship.

    “Despite intersectionality's theoretical dominance as a way of conceptualizing identity, a number of paradoxes embedded in its literature remain uninterrogated by feminist and anti-racist scholarship.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Intersectionality has become the 'gold standard' multidisciplinary approach for analysing subjects' experiences of both identity and oppression.

    “This 'important theoretical contribution' has become the 'gold standard' multidisciplinary approach for analysing subjects' experiences of both identity and oppression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCall, 2005 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Crenshaw offers little attention to the ways in which race and gender function as social processes in distinctive ways for particular black women in varying historical moments.

    “Furthermore, Crenshaw offers little attention to the ways in which race and gender function as social processes in distinctive ways for particular black women in varying historical moments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Crenshaw insists that simply adding black women to the existing regime will not remedy their marginalization.

    “Crenshaw insists that simply adding black women to the existing regime will not remedy their marginalization”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    McCall notes that despite the emergence of intersectionality as a major paradigm of research in women's studies and elsewhere, there has been little discussion of how to study intersectionality, that is, of its methodology.

    “there has been little discussion of how to study intersectionality, that is, of its methodology”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCall, 2005 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Because law recognizes only race-or gender-based injuries, black women's injuries as black women cannot be wholly addressed by the existing doctrinal structure.

    “Because law recognizes only race-or gender-based injuries, black women's injuries as black women cannot be wholly addressed by the existing doctrinal structure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Intersectionality seeks to demonstrate the racial variation(s) within gender and the gendered variation(s) within race through its attention to subjects whose identities contest race-or-gender categorizations.

    “Ultimately, intersectionality seeks to demonstrate the racial variation(s) within gender and the gendered variation(s) within race”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Crenshaw's conception of intersectionality has given politically progressive projects a way of describing both the simultaneity of multiple oppressions and the complexity of identity.

    “Crenshaw's conception of intersectionality, the idea that a 'yfocus on the most privileged group members marginalizes those who are multiply-burdened and obscures claims that cannot be understood as resulting from discrete sources of discrimination' has given politically progressive projects a way of describing both the simultaneity of multiple oppressions and the complexity of identity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Through nonobjective and often non-linear theoretical formations, intersectional scholars have been able to articulate the often ignored injuries of the 'spirit-murder' of 'racism/sexism'.

    “Through nonobjective and often non-linear theoretical formations, intersectional scholars have been able to articulate the often ignored injuries of the 'spirit-murder' (Williams, 1989) of 'racism/sexism' (Wing, 1990).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Williams, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Wing, 1990 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Intersectionality's relative inattention to methodology has been explained by the difficulty of crafting a method adequately attentive to the complexity that arises when the subject of analysis expands to include multiple dimensions of social life and categories of analysis.

    “Intersectionality's relative inattention to methodology has been explained by the difficulty of crafting a method adequately attentive to 'ythe complexity that arises when the subject of analysis expands to include multiple dimensions of social life and categories of analysis'”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCall, 2005 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    McCall's analytic frameworks highlight a tremendous gap between conceptions of intersectional methodology and practices of intersectional investigations.

    “McCall's analytic frameworks highlight a tremendous gap between conceptions of intersectional methodology and practices of intersectional investigations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCall, 2005 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chang and Culp highlight the methodological murkiness of intersectionality by querying how one pays attention to points of intersection, how many intersections there are, and whether the idea of an intersection is the right analogy.

    “Robert Chang and Jerome McCristal Culp, Jr. highlight the methodological murkiness of intersectionality querying 'How does one pay attention to the points of intersection?How many intersections are there?Is the idea of an intersection the right analogy?'”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chang and Culp, 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    McCall analyses three distinct intersectional methodologies, each with theoretical and practical shortcomings and benefits.

    “McCall analyses three distinct intersectional methodologies, each with theoretical and practical shortcomings and benefits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCall, 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Adrien Wing's work exemplifies the reliance on literary devices to describe black women's experiences.

    “Adrien Wing's work exemplifies the reliance on literary devices to describe black women's experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wing, 1990 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    It is a critical moment to engage with intersectionality's contradictions, absences, and murkiness because it is now a leading feminist paradigm with expansive interdisciplinary reach.

    “It is precisely because intersectionality is now 'a leading feminist paradigm' with expansive interdisciplinary reach that it is a critical moment to engage with its contradictions, absences, and murkiness”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zack, 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Despite the methodological challenges of complex analyses, some scholars have worked to develop various tools that can be used to craft an intersectional methodology.

    “Yet despite the methodological challenges of complex analyses, some scholars have worked to develop various tools that can be used to craft an intersectional methodology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While the use of poetry as a mechanism for disrupting logocentrism is a convention of feminist theory, and the use of narrative is a conventional critical race tool for dislodging law's claims of objectivity, the deployment of poetry as the primary vehicle for evoking the experiences of marginalized subjects suggests a shortcoming in the methodological orientation of intersectional theory.

    “While the use of poetry as a mechanism for disrupting logocentrism is a convention of feminist theory, and the use of narrative is a conventional critical race tool for dislodging law's claims of objectivity, the deployment of poetry as the primary vehicle for evoking the experiences of marginalized subjects suggests a shortcoming in the methodological orientation of intersectional theory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While some scholars have reified cumulative notions of identity, others have used poetry, narrative, and standpoint epistemology as a method for disrupting race-or-gender logic.

    “While some scholars have reified cumulative notions of identity, others have used poetry (Wing, 1990), narrative (Williams, 1989), and standpoint epistemology (Matsuda, 1987) as a method for disrupting race-or-gender logic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wing, 1990 source
    • cites Williams, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Matsuda, 1987

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Because 'black women are theoretically erased', centring black women's experiences makes feminism and anti-racist work's systematic inattention to black women apparent and demonstrates the necessity of deepening feminist and anti-racist conversations.

    “Because 'black women are theoretically erased', centring black women's experiences makes feminism and anti-racist work's systematic inattention to black women apparent and demonstrates the necessity of deepening feminist and anti-racist conversations (Crenshaw, 1989: 139).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The 'logic of the trial' enables scholars to locate racist and sexist practices that undergird seemingly neutral and objective sites, but tends to ignore the mechanisms through which domination operates, proliferates, and entrenches itself.

    “While the 'logic of the trial' enables scholars to locate the racist and sexist practices that undergird seemingly neutral and objective sites (like law), it also tends to ignore the mechanisms through which domination operates, proliferates, and entrenches itself (Wacquant, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wacquant, 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This unresolved theoretical dispute makes it unclear whether intersectionality is a theory of marginalized subjectivity or a generalized theory of identity.

    “This unresolved theoretical dispute makes it unclear whether intersectionality is a theory of marginalized subjectivity or a generalized theory of identity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Black women's experiences are used as a theoretical wedge designed to demonstrate the shortcomings of conventional feminist and anti-racist work.

    “To that end, black women's experiences are used as a theoretical wedge, designed to demonstrate the shortcomings of conventional feminist and anti-racist work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crenshaw, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The deployment of poetry as the primary vehicle for evoking marginalized subjects' experiences suggests that the project has yet to produce a mechanism for systematically articulating, aggregating, or examining the 'multiple levels of consciousness' that form the basis of their study of subjectivity.

    “In particular, it suggests that the project has yet to produce a mechanism for systematically articulating, aggregating, or examining the 'multiple levels of consciousness' that form the basis of their study of subjectivity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wing, 1990 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Intersectionality has yet to articulate with specificity a larger theoretical and political project beyond simply identifying particular intersections as undertheorized or unacknowledged.

    “Simply identifying particular intersections as undertheorized or unacknowledged is only the first step in a larger theoretical and political project, which intersectionality has yet to articulate with specificity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Matsuda's intervention demonstrates the interconnections of forms of subordination, yet gestures toward the tendency of intersectional theorists to ignore the intimate connections between privilege and oppression.

    “Matsuda's intervention demonstrates the interconnections of forms of subordination, yet gestures toward the tendency of intersectional theorists to ignore the intimate connections between privilege and oppression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Matsuda, 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Matsuda's framework underscores the ways in which patriarchy, racism, and heterosexism buttress each other, but ignores the ways in which subjects might be both victimized by patriarchy and privileged by race in particular social, cultural, historical, and political moments.

    “Her framework underscores the ways in which patriarchy, racism, and heterosexism buttress each other, but ignores the ways in which subjects might be both victimized by patriarchy and privileged by race (it also ignores the ways in which subjects might take pleasure in some of the trappings of patriarchal power) in particular social, cultural, historical, and political moments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Matsuda, 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Black women enable scholars to 'ask the other question', to expose the spectres of racism and sexism, which leave their traces even in progressive analyses.

    “That is, black women enable scholars to 'ask the other question', to expose the spectres of racism and sexism, which leave their traces even in progressive analyses (Matsuda, 1987).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Matsuda, 1987

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The deployment of poetry as the primary vehicle for evoking marginalized subjects' experiences suggests that there is something poetic about black women's experiences of both identity and oppression, and that black women are inherently resilient subjects who retain an innate creativity even in the midst of the opposition that a patriarchal white-dominated culture produces.

    “Furthermore, it suggests that there is something poetic about black women's experiences of both identity and oppression, and that black women are inherently resilient subjects who retain an innate creativity even in the midst of the opposition that a patriarchal white-dominated culture produces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Kwan's intervention suggests that intersectionality has generally been opposed to imagining non-multiply marginalized subjects as central to its theoretical and political project, particularly because of its investment in 'recovering' marginalized subjects' voices and experiences.

    “Kwan's intervention suggests that intersectionality has generally been opposed to imagining non-multiply marginalized subjects as central to its theoretical and political project, particularly because of its investment in 'recovering' marginalized subjects' voices and experiences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kwan, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Intersectional literature has excluded an examination of identities that are imagined as either wholly or even partially privileged, although those identities are always constituted by the intersections of multiple vectors of power.

    “Generally, intersectional literature has excluded an examination of identities that are imagined as either wholly or even partially privileged, although those identities, like all identities, are always constituted by the intersections of multiple vectors of power.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kwan, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Assertions that black women's experiences can be reduced solely to marginalization ultimately romanticize and idealize positions of social subordination and reinstall conceptions that black women's bodies are sites of 'strength' and 'transcendence' rather than complex spaces of multiple meanings.

    “These assertions, while useful for problematizing the notion that black women's experiences can be reduced solely to marginalization, ultimately romanticize and idealize positions of social subordination and reinstall conceptions that black women's bodies are sites of 'strength' and 'transcendence' rather than complex spaces of multiple meanings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Intersectionality has yet to contend with whether its theory explains or describes the processes and mechanisms by which subjects mobilize (or choose not to mobilize) particular aspects of their identities in particular circumstances.

    “In particular, intersectionality has yet to contend with whether its theory explains or describes the processes and mechanisms by which subjects mobilize (or choose not to mobilize) particular aspects of their identities in particular circumstances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Intersectionality itself has become an institutionalized intellectual project and the dominant tool for excavating the voices of the marginalized.

    “Now that intersectionality itself has become an institutionalized intellectual project, and the dominant tool for excavating the voices of the marginalized, it is incumbent upon intersectional scholars to critically interrogate the goals of the intersectional project as they determine how to chart the future of this theoretical and political movement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Neither critical race feminism nor feminist theory has assessed or theorized the repercussions of conceptualizing identity as 'symbiotically, cosynthetically, multidimensionally, or interconnectedly' formed.

    “Yet neither of these projects has assessed or theorized the repercussions of conceptualizing of identity as 'symbiotically, cosynthetically, multidimensionally, or interconnectedly' formed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Black feminism imagines black women's subjectivities as an inherent disloyalty to race-or-gender thinking and marshals black women's stories, experiences, and narratives as a way of continuously and strategically jamming the workings of binary thinking.

    “In particular, black feminism imagines black women's subjectivities as an inherent disloyalty to race-or-gender thinking and marshals black women's stories, experiences, and narratives as a way of continuously and strategically jamming the workings of binary thinking.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
54 of 54

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Chang R.S., 2002, University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 71, 485
  2. Crenshaw K., 1992, Raceing Justice, Engendering Power
  3. Kwan P., 1996, Hastings Law Journal, 48, 1257
  4. Matsuda M., 1992, Women's Rights Law Reporter, 14, 297
  5. Wacquant L., 1997, Political Power and Social Theory II, 221
  6. Wing A.K., 1990, Berkeley Women's Law Journal, 6, 181

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nash, J. C.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Nash, Jennifer C.
Venue
Feminist Review
Published
2008-06
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 0141-7789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4380
OpenAlex
W2102167286
Cited by
1,995
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 119 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 163 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 155 · 2021: 202 · 2020: 184 · 2019: 180 · 2018: 142 · 2017: 115 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 73
FWCI
57.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Feminist Review (publishedVersion)
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
intersectionality, critique of intersectionality, Black feminism, systemic oppression, racism, classism, sexism, marginalization, identity, anti-racism, Black women, feminist theory, race, class, and gender

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review