The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics
Open accessAbstract
This book examines the shape, composition, and practices of the United States political media landscape. It explores the roots of the current epistemic crisis in political communication with a focus on the remarkable 2016 U.S. president election culminating in the victory of Donald Trump and the first year of his presidency. The authors present a detailed map of the American political media landscape based on the analysis of millions of stories and social media posts, revealing a highly polarized and asymmetric media ecosystem. Detailed case studies track the emergence and propagation of disinformation in the American public sphere that took advantage of structural weaknesses in the media institutions across the political spectrum. This book describes how the conservative faction led by Steve Bannon and funded by Robert Mercer was able to inject opposition research into the mainstream media agenda that left an unsubstantiated but indelible stain of corruption on the Clinton campaign. The authors also document how Fox News deflects negative coverage of President Trump and has promoted a series of exaggerated and fabricated counter narratives to defend the president against the damaging news coming out of the Mueller investigation. Based on an analysis of the actors that sought to influence political public discourse, this book argues that the current problems of media and democracy are not the result of Russian interference, behavioral microtargeting and algorithms on social media, political clickbait, hackers, sockpuppets, or trolls, but of asymmetric media structures decades in the making. The crisis is political, not technological.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In response, communication scholars have adopted decades-old theories of propaganda and mass communication to understand disinformation and media manipulation online (154, 159, 160).”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [154]
In the citing paper
“This raises the possibility that some business models may be fundamentally incompatible with a healthy society (154).”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [154]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
Poucke, M. V. (2025) · Atlantic Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/15456870.2025.2453738 · Cited by 15
Consuming Fake News: Can We Do Any Better?
Croce, M., & Piazza, T. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1949643 · Cited by 15
von Nordheim, G., Rieger, J., & Königslöw, K. K. (2021) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1970602 · Cited by 11
Rogers, R., & Hagen, S. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789463724838_ch09 · Cited by 12
Populism and Political Knowledge: The United States in Comparative Perspective
Milner, H. (2020) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v8i1.2560 · Cited by 12
The IMPED Model: Detecting Low-Quality Information in Social Media
Bastos, M., Walker, S., & Simeone, M. P. (2020) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764221989776 · Cited by 11
Green, B. (2021) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72154-1_6 · Cited by 12
The effect of uncertainty communication on public trust depends on belief–evidence consistency
Dries, C., McDowell, M., Schneider, C., & Rebitschek, F. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf071 · Cited by 14
“Studies have shown that conservatives and right-wingers are much more likely to consume, share, and believe false information than liberals (55, 56).”
McIlwain, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108886260.008 · Cited by 11
“Newstrusting” or “newsbusting?” heuristic and systematic information processing and trust in media
Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2021) · Atlantic Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/15456870.2021.1869004 · Cited by 12
Information, partisanship, and preferences in a pandemic
Rothwell, J., Makridis, C. A., Ramirez, C. M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1019206 · Cited by 11
Mann, M., Zulli, D., Foote, J., Ku, E., & Primm, E. (2023) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231231174823 · Cited by 12
Ma, C. (2023) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2283703 · Cited by 12
Digital rights in perspective: The evolution of the debate in the Internet Governance Forum
Meireles, A. V. (2024) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12571 · Cited by 11
Countering the “Climate Cult” – Framing Cascades in Far-Right Digital Networks
Knüpfer, C. B., & Hoffmann, M. (2024) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2024.2332762 · Cited by 12
“And indeed, research on US politics has underscored strategic network ties between far-and center-right sources on issues also espoused by Republican candidates (Benkler et al., 2018; Kaiser et al., 2020).”
Combating contamination and contagion: Embodied and environmental metaphors of misinformation
Eadon, Y. M., & Wood, S. (2024) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565241255347 · Cited by 16
Digital propaganda is not simply propaganda in digital garb: toward an expanded theory of propaganda
Lin, C. (2024) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtae017 · Cited by 14
The ethical evaluation of large language models and its optimization
Lyu, Y., & Du, Y. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00654-9 · Cited by 11
Kotenko, I. V., Vitkova, L., Saenko, I. B., Tushkanova, O. N., & Branitskiy, A. A. (2020) · AI Communications · doi:10.3233/aic-200647 · Cited by 11
Napoli, P. M. (2021) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.253 · Cited by 10
Writer movements between news outlets reflect political polarization in media
Hagar, N., Wachs, J., & Horvát, E.-Á. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211027173 · Cited by 11
Demagoguery, populism, and foreign policy rhetoric: evidence from Jair Bolsonaro’s tweets
de Moraes, R. F. (2022) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2022.2126155 · Cited by 13
“This pattern resembles what happened in the case of Trump, whose tweets during the presidential campaign and administration reverberated through mainstream media, boosting his coverage (Benkler et al., 2018, pp. 18–19; Wells et al., 2020).”
BackgroundGorissen, S. (2023) · Communication and Democracy · doi:10.1080/27671127.2023.2264367 · Cited by 12
Samuelsen, R. J., Kalsnes, B., & Steensen, S. (2023) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2023.2280676 · Cited by 11
Critical reading of online news commentary headlines: Stylistic and pragmatic aspects
Dykstra, A. (2019) · Topics in Linguistics · doi:10.2478/topling-2019-0011 · Cited by 11
Burri, M. (2022) · Economic analysis of law in European legal scholarship · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95876-3_2 · Cited by 11
Brems, M. K. (2024) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612241301647 · Cited by 10
Solea, A. I., & Sugiura, L. (2025) · Crime Media Culture An International Journal · doi:10.1177/17416590251387245 · Cited by 12
Rasul, M. E., Calabrese, C., Oh, Y. J., Cho, H. J., Jeon, M., & Boukes, M. (2025) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990251373085 · Cited by 11
“Furthermore, existing research has found that distrust in mainstream news drives consumption of alternative news channels (Benkler et al., 2018).”
Information manipulation on TikTok and its relation to American users' beliefs about China
Finkelstein, D., Yanovsky, S., Zucker, J., Jagdeep, A., Vasko, C., Jagdeep, A., Jussim, L., & Finkelstein, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2024.1497434 · Cited by 12
Guo, Y.-F., & Lei, Y. (2025) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612251315597 · Cited by 8
Cascading falsehoods: mapping the diffusion of misinformation in algorithmic environments
Shin, D., & Shin, E. Y. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02575-5 · Cited by 19
“In politics, false claims have been used to sway elections, stoke division, and undermine trust in institutions (Benkler et al. 2018).”
de Barros, A. T., Bernardes, C. B., de Faria, C. F. S., et al. (2021) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsab046 · Cited by 10
Persily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.002 · Cited by 11
Neff, T., & Jemielniak, D. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221081426 · Cited by 13
“…of new theories and research on counter-publics, homophily, and “echo chambers” in digital spaces (Dahlberg, 2007; Flaxman et al., 2016; McIlwain, 2016), which have become enduring concerns in studies of online communication (Benkler et al., 2013, 2018; Chan, 2018; Sampedro and Avidad, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodEroğlu, Ş., & Çakmak, T. (2020) · Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute · doi:10.30794/pausbed.682120 · Cited by 10
Turner, J. (2021) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2021.1991837 · Cited by 10
Epistemology and the Pandemic: Lessons from an Epistemic Crisis
Špecián, P. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.2009931 · Cited by 10
Straub, J., Spradling, M., & Fedor, B. (2022) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc12020061 · Cited by 10
Wright, C. L., Gatlin, K., Acosta, D., & Taylor, C. C. W. (2022) · Howard Journal of Communications · doi:10.1080/10646175.2022.2065458 · Cited by 10
“…compared to liberal consumers, are more susceptible to misinformation targeting and belief (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017; Badawy et al., 2018; Benkler et al., 2018; DiResta et al., 2018; Freelon & Lokot, 2020; Grinberg et al., 2019; Guess et al., 2019; Hjorth & Adler-Nissen, 2019;…”
Considering Interinstitutional Visibilities in Combating Misinformation
Bélair‐Gagnon, V., Graves, L., Kalsnes, B., Steensen, S., & Westlund, O. (2022) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2072923 · Cited by 12
Suk, J., Shah, D. V., & McLeod, D. M. (2021) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqab015 · Cited by 12
Problematizing Modern Democracy in the United States:
Simon, J. (2023) · Politische Vierteljahresschrift · doi:10.1007/s11615-023-00486-y · Cited by 11
The Contexts and Consequences of Hybridity for Alternative News Audiences
Rauch, J. (2023) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2023.2180407 · Cited by 10
Goodin, R. E. (2019) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12311 · Cited by 9
Mobs, Crowds, and Trolls: Theorizing the Harassment of Journalists in the Philippines
Neilson, T., & Ortiga, K. (2022) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2126990 · Cited by 9
Alexander, J. C. (2023) · Society · doi:10.1007/s12115-023-00883-4 · Cited by 9
Smith, M. A. L., & Haenschen, K. (2024) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2024.2347317 · Cited by 9
Agents of Discord: Modeling the Impact of Political Bots on Opinion Polarization in Social Networks
Lu, H.-C., & Lee, H. (2024) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393241270382 · Cited by 9
Pasquetto, I. V., Lim, G., & Bradshaw, S. (2024) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-159 · Cited by 9
Theisen, W., Yankoski, M. G., Höök, K., Verdeja, E., Scheirer, W. J., & Weninger, T. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2492577 · Cited by 9
Jozaghi, E. (2025) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849251344230 · Cited by 10
“Moreover, Benkler et al. (2018) maintain that nations with well-funded public broadcasters (e.g., Germany) are more immune to the toxic in fl uence of misinformation, disinformation, and conspiracy theories, and are less affected by mass polarization.”
Challengers to Journalism: Alternative Media Editors’ Framing of Editorial Values and Practices
Figenschou, T. U., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2025) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2025.2538121 · Cited by 9
Synthetic Media and Information Warfare: Assessing Potential Threats
Kalpokas, I., & Kalpokienė, J. (2021) · Contributions to international relations · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73955-3_3 · Cited by 9
Propaganda Chimera: Unpacking the Iranian Perception Information Operations in the Arab World
Elswah, M., & Alimardani, M. (2021) · Open Information Science · doi:10.1515/opis-2020-0122 · Cited by 9
“In the western context, it means that the public sphere is “vulnerable to disinformation, propaganda, and just sheer bullshit” (Benkler, Farris, and Roberts, 2018).”
BackgroundRational inference strategies and the genesis of polarization and extremism
Kvam, P. D., Alaukik, A., Mims, C. E., Martemyanova, A., & Baldwin, M. W. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11389-0 · Cited by 13
Jarlbrink, J., & Norén, F. (2022) · Scandinavian Journal of History · doi:10.1080/03468755.2022.2134202 · Cited by 9
Zhang, Y., Yue, Z., Yang, X., Chen, F., & Kwak, N. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221137324 · Cited by 9
“This finding aligns with research showing that the right-wing media ecosystem is overall cloistered and insulated from the larger media ecology (Benkler et al., 2018; Faris et al., 2017).”
Technopopulism and Politainment in Brazil: Bolsonaro Government’s Weekly YouTube Broadcasts
Nubila, K. D., Ballesteros, C., Hernández, D. E., et al. (2023) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v11i2.6470 · Cited by 9
Wang, R., Walter, D., & Ophir, Y. (2023) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393231188472 · Cited by 9
Are Online Political Influencers Accelerating Democratic Deconsolidation?
Gibson, R., Bon, E., Darius, P., & Smyth, P. (2023) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v11i3.6813 · Cited by 9
Jiang, X., Zhang, Y., Kim, J., Pevehouse, J. C. W., & Shah, D. V. (2023) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2263400 · Cited by 10
Peng, Y., Tian, Y., & Fang, K. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231205893 · Cited by 9
McGowan-Kirsch, A. M., & Quinlivan, G. V. (2023) · Communication Teacher · doi:10.1080/17404622.2023.2271548 · Cited by 9
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Semantic Entropy, and the Big Sort
Berghel, H. (2024) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2023.3331594 · Cited by 9
Adams, K. (2020) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2020.1770118 · Cited by 10
Oates, S. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003004431-8 · Cited by 9
Big Data, Surveillance Capitalism, and Precision Medicine: Challenges for Privacy
Rothstein, M. A. (2021) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1017/jme.2021.91 · Cited by 10
The Authoritarian Personality 2.0
Weigel, M. (2021) · Polity · doi:10.1086/717511 · Cited by 9
Coronavirus meets the clash of civilizations
de Albuquerque, A., de Oliveira, T. M., dos Santos, M. A., Quinan, R., & Mazur, D. (2022) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565221105789 · Cited by 9
Ganesh, B., & Faggiani, N. (2023) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2023.2268180 · Cited by 10
Curtailing Fake News Propagation with PsychographicsPreprint
Safadi, H., Li, W., Rahmati, P., & Soleymani, S. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3558236 · Cited by 10
Platform Ad Archives: Promises and PitfallsPreprint
Leerssen, P., Ausloos, J., Zarouali, B., et al. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3380409 · Cited by 9
Misinformation about COVID-19: Psychological Insights
Anastasiades, E., Argyrides, M., & Mousoulidou, M. (2021) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia1040091 · Cited by 10
Exposure to Untrustworthy Websites in the 2020 US ElectionPreprint
Moore, R. C., Dahlke, R., & Hancock, J. T. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/6bgqh · Cited by 8
Ahmad, W., Sen, A., Eesley, C. E., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4514749 · Cited by 10
The Authority to Moderate: Social Media Moderation and its Limits
Kashyap, B., & Formosa, P. (2023) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00685-w · Cited by 8
“For example, imagine that two users post relevantly similar content on a platform that seems to comply with that platform’s published community standards.”
Lepird, C. S., Ng, L. H. X., Wu, A., & Carley, K. M. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051241245950 · Cited by 15
Rauchfleisch, A., & Jungherr, A. (2024) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.407 · Cited by 6
Brugman, B. C., van Huijstee, D., & Droog, E. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241288482 · Cited by 8
The art of delirium: social media suppression in authoritarian regimes
Kermani, H. (2025) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtaf006 · Cited by 11
What Is Communication Research For? Wrestling with the Relevance of What We Do
Lewis, S. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108886260.012 · Cited by 8
Demographics of an International Influence Operation Affecting Facebook Users in the United States
Beers, A., Wilson, T., & Starbird, K. (2022) · Journal of Online Trust and Safety · doi:10.54501/jots.v1i4.55 · Cited by 8
Rabb, N., Cowen, L., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2023) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-023-00601-3 · Cited by 8
Strömbäck, J., Lindgren, E., Tsfati, Y., Damstra, A., Vliegenthart, R., Boomgaarden, H. G., Broda, E., Lebernegg, N. S., & Galyga, S. (2023) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2023.2281311 · Cited by 10
“On the other hand, it has also lowered the entry barriers for those who want to disseminate false and misleading information (Benkler et al., 2018; Kavanagh & Rich, 2018; Strömbäck et al., 2022).”
Heckman, M., Bhargava, R., & Ndulue, E. B. (2023) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2023.2280545 · Cited by 8
Decoding identity and representation in the age of AI
Baltezarević, B. (2023) · Megatrend revija · doi:10.5937/megrev2302141b · Cited by 8
Exploring the role of political elites in post-truth communication on social media
Graham, T., & FitzGerald, K. M. (2024) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x241244919 · Cited by 13
The speed of news in Twitter (X) versus radio
Brannon, W., & Roy, D. K. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-61921-7 · Cited by 12
Holbert, R. L., Dias, N. C., Hardy, B. W., Jamieson, K. H., Levendusky, M. S., Renninger, A., Römer, D., Winneg, K. M., & Josh Pasek, B. (2020) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764220975054 · Cited by 8
“The conservative media versus all other media distinction matches the network associations detailed in Benkler et al. (2018).”
BackgroundFrom Global Village to Identity Tribes: Context Collapse and the Darkest Timeline
Bastos, M. (2021) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v9i3.3930 · Cited by 10
r/WatchRedditDie and the politics of reddit’s bans and quarantines
DeCook, J. R. (2021) · Internet Histories · doi:10.1080/24701475.2021.1997179 · Cited by 10
“…under increasing scrutiny due to their affordances being exploited to push hate speech, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns meant to weaken the social and political fabric of countries all over the world (Benkler et al., 2018; Marwick & Lewis, 2017; McKay & Tenove, 2020; Suzor et al., 2018).”
BackgroundCharacterizing the Anti-Vaxxers’ Reply Behavior on Social Media
Miyazaki, K., Uchiba, T., Tanaka, K., & Sasahara, K. (2021) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence · doi:10.1145/3498851.3498934 · Cited by 8
Research on prosocial screen and immersive media effects: a systematic literature review
Canet, F., & Pérez-Escolar, M. (2022) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2022.2130810 · Cited by 10
“Global crises and their repercussions on society can provoke antisocial reactions that threaten our democratic values (Benkler et al., 2018; Foa & Mounk, 2016; Snyder, 2018).”
BackgroundThe moral source of collective irrationality during COVID-19 vaccination campaigns
Voinea, C., Marin, L., & Vică, C. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2164264 · Cited by 8
“…are tweaked for engagement or, to put it more simply, they rank and make more visible precisely that information that “grabs more eyeballs” (Williams, 2018), even if that information might actually be disinformation, used for purposes of manipulation and radicalization (Benkler et. al., 2018).”
BackgroundCastillo, S. S., López-Olano, C., & Blanes, Á. P. (2023) · Revista Latina de Comunicación Social · doi:10.4185/rlcs-2023-1870 · Cited by 8
Furman, I., Gürel, K. B., & Sivaslıoğlu, F. B. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051221150418 · Cited by 8
“Russian disinformation and opinion manipulation efforts in Western democracies have been quite brazen, making them easy for researchers to pinpoint (see, for instance, Bastos & Farkas, 2019; Benkler et al., 2018; Gorwa, 2018; Karlsen, 2019; Woolley & Guilbeault, 2018).”
BackgroundThe Night Wolves: Evidence of Russian Sharp Power and Propaganda from the Victory Roads’ Itinerary
Kleiner, J., Gregor, M., & Mlejnková, P. (2023) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2023.2164864 · Cited by 8
Curated Misinformation: Liking Facebook Pages for Fake News Sites
Haenschen, K., Shu, M. X., & Gilliland, J. A. (2023) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642231175638 · Cited by 9
Mind The Gap! The Role of Political Identity and Attitudes in the Emergence of Belief Gaps
Saldaña, M., McGregor, S. C., & Johnson, T. (2021) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edab006 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2018-10-18
- OpenAlex
- W4213327489
- Cited by
- 1,504
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 269 · 2025: 260 · 2024: 206 · 2023: 198 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 173 · 2020: 172 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 116.61
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- 2016 US presidential election, Donald Trump, disinformation, media polarization, conservative media, Steve Bannon, Fox News, Mueller investigation, counter-narratives, media and democracy, public sphere
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review