The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics
Open accessAbstract
This book examines the shape, composition, and practices of the United States political media landscape. It explores the roots of the current epistemic crisis in political communication with a focus on the remarkable 2016 U.S. president election culminating in the victory of Donald Trump and the first year of his presidency. The authors present a detailed map of the American political media landscape based on the analysis of millions of stories and social media posts, revealing a highly polarized and asymmetric media ecosystem. Detailed case studies track the emergence and propagation of disinformation in the American public sphere that took advantage of structural weaknesses in the media institutions across the political spectrum. This book describes how the conservative faction led by Steve Bannon and funded by Robert Mercer was able to inject opposition research into the mainstream media agenda that left an unsubstantiated but indelible stain of corruption on the Clinton campaign. The authors also document how Fox News deflects negative coverage of President Trump and has promoted a series of exaggerated and fabricated counter narratives to defend the president against the damaging news coming out of the Mueller investigation. Based on an analysis of the actors that sought to influence political public discourse, this book argues that the current problems of media and democracy are not the result of Russian interference, behavioral microtargeting and algorithms on social media, political clickbait, hackers, sockpuppets, or trolls, but of asymmetric media structures decades in the making. The crisis is political, not technological.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In response, communication scholars have adopted decades-old theories of propaganda and mass communication to understand disinformation and media manipulation online (154, 159, 160).”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [154]
In the citing paper
“This raises the possibility that some business models may be fundamentally incompatible with a healthy society (154).”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [154]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 999
Amenta, E., Caren, N., & Yuan, W. (2024) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.13006 · Cited by 5
Who Checks the Checkers? Exploring Source Credibility in Twitter’s Community Notes
Kangur, U., Chakraborty, R., & Sharma, R. R. (2026) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-025-00455-y · Cited by 22
Political Determinants of Health: Has COVID-19 Exposed the Worst of It?
Chowell, G., & Islam, N. (2024) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2024.307778 · Cited by 5
Harris, K. R. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04763-0 · Cited by 7
Competing for Cultural Authority: Journalism Studies Must Account for the Right
Bauer, A. J., & Nadler, A. (2025) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2025.2454344 · Cited by 5
An island of trust: public broadcasting in the United States
Ali, C., den Bulck, H. V., & Kropko, J. (2025) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaf009 · Cited by 5
Disinformation as process: modeling the lifecycle of deceit
Tolz, V., Hutchings, S., Казаков, В. А., & Tipaldou, S. (2025) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtaf009 · Cited by 7
Políticas de la posverdad en el Próximo Oriente: los estudios de caso de Siria y Turquía
Cosentino, G., & Alikasifoglu, B. (2019) · Artnodes · doi:10.7238/a.v0i24.3284 · Cited by 5
Vitkova, L., Saenko, I. B., & Tushkanova, O. N. (2019) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32258-8_29 · Cited by 5
Algorithmic Dwelling: Ethos as Deformance in Online Spaces
Wilson, N. (2020) · Rhetoric Review · doi:10.1080/07350198.2020.1727605 · Cited by 6
Disinformation and Polarization in the Online Debate During the 2020 Presidential Election in Poland
Domalewska, D. (2021) · Safety & Defense · doi:10.37105/sd.92 · Cited by 5
Gurevitch, L. (2021) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502386.2021.1898023 · Cited by 5
Impact of Covid-19 Infodemic on the Global Picture
Rudra, T., & Kautish, S. (2021) · EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68936-0_16 · Cited by 5
Socially Engineering a Polarizing Discourse on Facebook through Malware-Induced Misperception
Sharevski, F., Treebridge, P., Jachim, P., Li, A., Babin, A., & Westbrook, J. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.2009671 · Cited by 5
“In other words, the attack covertly “nudges” a targeted individual to make interpretations of a set of true facts to the objective of the malicious actor (Benkler et al., 2018).”
BackgroundIs the Alt-Right Popular in Canada? Image Sharing, Popular Culture, and Social Media
McKelvey, F. R., DeJong, S., Kowalchuck, S., & Donovan, E. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.3138/cjc.2022-0021 · Cited by 8
Miguel, A. V., Medina, M., & Gutiérrez-Rentería, M. E. (2023) · Journal of Media Business Studies · doi:10.1080/16522354.2023.2214447 · Cited by 7
Bursts of contemporaneous publication among high- and low-credibility online information providers
Budak, C., Bozarth, L., Bond, R. M., Margolin, D., Jones, J. J., & Garrett, R. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231183617 · Cited by 5
‘Think of Him as The President’: Tabloid Trump and the Political Imaginary, 1980–1999
Baym, G. (2019) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqz022 · Cited by 5
Hallin, D. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108886260.004 · Cited by 6
Disconnection for protection (D4P): an addition to the disconnection repertoire
Rohman, A., & Ang, P. H. (2021) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437211022689 · Cited by 5
The Limits of Memory and the News: Archival Journalism, Law, Ethics, and the Right to be Forgotten
Presuel, R. C., & Atala, F. G. (2022) · Revista de Comunicación · doi:10.26441/rc21.1-2022-a4 · Cited by 5
A Cruzada Contra o Capital Cultural
Miguel, L. F. (2022) · Mediações Revista de Ciências Sociais · doi:10.5433/2176-6665.2022v27n3e45807 · Cited by 5
The Regulation of Disinformation in the EU – Overview and Open QuestionsPreprint
Peukert, A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4496691 · Cited by 5
Huang, J. T., Choi, J., & Wan, Y. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4990476 · Cited by 5
Junk news bubbles modelling the rise and fall of attention in online arenas
Castaldo, M., Venturini, T., Frasca, P., & Gargiulo, F. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820978640 · Cited by 32
“In a previous paper (Venturini, 2019), we proposed the term “junk news” to expand the notion of “fake news” beyond its excessive focus on deceitfulness (cf., among others, Zuckerman, 2017; Benkler et al., 2018; Gray et al. 2020).”
BackgroundAlberts, K. (2025) · Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines · doi:10.1080/00083968.2025.2491679 · Cited by 4
“…“echo chambers,” where users are increasingly exposed to information that reinforces their beliefs, due to algorithms prioritising content that generates more engagement, which is often sensationalist or emotionally charged messages (Benkler, Faris, and Roberts 2018; Vosoughi, Roy, and Aral 2018).”
Törnberg, A., & Törnberg, P. (2025) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2025.2557684 · Cited by 7
Coordinated inauthentic behaviour on Facebook? A typology of manufactured attention
Rogers, R., & Righetti, N. (2025) · Platforms & Society · doi:10.1177/29768624251369784 · Cited by 6
Mosleh, M., Allen, J. N. L., & Rand, D. G. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2425739122 · Cited by 7
Toward a group theory of political communication
Coles, S. M., Kreiss, D., Lane, D. S., & McGregor, S. C. (2025) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaf049 · Cited by 6
Krzyżanowski, M., Krzyżanowska, N., & Rydgren, J. (2025) · Social Semiotics · doi:10.1080/10350330.2025.2601608 · Cited by 6
The growth of hybrid political actors in the fourth age of political communication
Davis, A. (2025) · Global Media and Communication · doi:10.1177/17427665251406808 · Cited by 5
“Many are no different from politically organised propaganda operations, churning out misinfor mation and fake stories presented as factual news (Benkler et al., 2018; Bennet and Livingston, 2020; Freelon and Wells, 2020).”
A House Divided: Donald Trump and the Transformation of American Politics
Cruz, S. C. V. E. (2021) · Contributions to international relations · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87914-3_8 · Cited by 4
Digital Media, Propaganda, and Information Wars
Marmura, S. M. E. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30940-3_3 · Cited by 4
Kaluža, J. (2024) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2024.2320534 · Cited by 4
Drowning Out Dissent: The Thai Military’s Quest to Fabricate Popular Support on Twitter
Sirikupt, C. (2024) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612241279158 · Cited by 11
Disinformation in the media: problems, challenges and solutions
Direev, I. D. (2025) · Litera · doi:10.25136/2409-8698.2025.1.73205 · Cited by 5
Santos, T. D. L., Smith, E., & Johnson, J. A. (2025) · Electronic News · doi:10.1177/19312431251319550 · Cited by 4
Boţan, M., Ştefureac, R. I., & Stancea, A. (2025) · New Perspectives · doi:10.1177/2336825x251322721 · Cited by 4
Beyond Polarization: Right-Wing News as a Quasi-religious Phenomenon
Mann, M., & Winchester, D. (2025) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/07352751251326951 · Cited by 8
Zapleteno je: protipolno razmerje med globalnimi digitalnimi platformami in slovenskimi mediji
Kaluža, J., & Brlek, S. S. (2021) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2021.2012935 · Cited by 4
“…enega od svojih vrhuncev doživela ob razkritjih, povezanih z ameriški predsedniškimi volitvami iz leta 2016, nekateri avtorji ponazarjajo celo s slavno izjavo Walterja Lippmanna, da smo priče »revoluciji, močnejši od premikov ekonomske moči, ki potiska demokracijo v kot« (v Benkler et al. 2018, 3).”
BackgroundCodes. L’informatique comme elle s’écrit
Alcaras, G., & Larribeau, A. (2022) · RESET · doi:10.4000/reset.3914 · Cited by 5
Knowledge on Stage: Public Roles of Scientists In Times of Communicative Abundance
Mendonça, R. F., & Castelfranchi, Y. (2022) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2022.2042786 · Cited by 5
Flew, T. (2022) · Palgrave global media policy and business · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95220-4_14 · Cited by 4
Post-Truth and Democracy: a reflection on disinformation mechanisms
Dias, C. P., dos Reis, B. M. C., & Lopes, P. (2022) · RIPS Revista de Investigaciones Políticas y Sociológicas · doi:10.15304/rips.21.1.8198 · Cited by 4
Chagas, V. H. C. D. S., & Costa, G. D. (2023) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2023.mar.23 · Cited by 4
Berg, A. L. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231189262 · Cited by 12
Figenschou, T. U., & Thorbjørnsrud, K. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231198790 · Cited by 8
Craig, B. B., Rahko, S. E., & Carpenter, N. J. (2023) · Communication and the Public · doi:10.1177/20570473231217122 · Cited by 7
The legitimation of conspiracy theories through manipulation
Demata, M. (2024) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.339.05dem · Cited by 4
Kim, H. Y. (2024) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2024.2309047 · Cited by 10
Presidential Authority and the Legitimation of Far-Right News
Archer, A. M. N., Schmitt, C., McGregor, S. C., & Jang, H. (2024) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612241235630 · Cited by 5
Conceptual engineering and the dynamics of linguistic intervention
Gibbons, A. F. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2367251 · Cited by 4
de Keulenaar, E. V., Poell, T., Helmond, A., et al. (2024) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565241258956 · Cited by 4
Copycats? Do right-wing groups emulate left-wing digital advocacy organizations?
Hall, N., Heft, A., & Vaughan, M. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2024.2414888 · Cited by 4
Roche, É., Lefébure, P., & Sécail, C. (2024) · Politiques de communication · doi:10.3917/pdc.022.0123 · Cited by 4
Herasimenka, A., Wang, X., & Schroeder, R. (2025) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli13020032 · Cited by 9
Buehling, K., Zhang, X., & Heft, A. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448251315756 · Cited by 9
Eze, U. Z., & Zacky-Eze, C. J. (2025) · Tripodos · doi:10.51698/tripodos.2025.57.01 · Cited by 5
Tauscher, S., & Eskicioğlu, Y. C. (2025) · Middle East Critique · doi:10.1080/19436149.2025.2496846 · Cited by 4
“On the other hand, Breitbart reaches its largest audience through Facebook (Benkler, Faris, and Roberts 2018, 51–52).”
InfluentialDemocratic governance and policy complexity: revisiting the intelligence of democracy
Lenz, A., Fernández‐i‐Marín, X., Hinterleitner, M., et al. (2025) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2025.2553756 · Cited by 4
Sylvia, J. J., & Moody, K. (2019) · Advances in media, entertainment and the arts (AMEA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8535-0.ch018 · Cited by 4
Researching Social Networks: Opportunities and Challenges
Jemielniak, D. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2020.00001 · Cited by 2
Salamanos, N., Jensen, M. J., Iordanou, C., & Sirivianos, M. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-5177-2_4 · Cited by 4
Cramer, B. W. (2020) · Journal of Information Policy · doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.10.2020.0123 · Cited by 4
Martin, J. D., Hassan, F., Anghelcev, G., Abunabaa, N., & Shaath, S. (2021) · International Communication Gazette · doi:10.1177/1748048521992486 · Cited by 4
Jaster, R., & Lanius, D. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-33255-6_9 · Cited by 9
Barnidge, M., Diehl, T., Sherrill, L. A., & Zhang, J. (2021) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqab023 · Cited by 6
Leavey, S. T. (2022) · Communication and Democracy · doi:10.1080/27671127.2022.2049451 · Cited by 5
Content Analysis in the Research Field of Disinformation
Staender, A., & Humprecht, E. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-36179-2_29 · Cited by 4
Romero-Martín, G., Caraballo, M. Á., & Hernández, C. M. (2023) · International Journal of Public Leadership · doi:10.1108/ijpl-10-2022-0053 · Cited by 5
Dawson, J. (2023) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.12907 · Cited by 11
Using Message Strategies to Attenuate the Effects of Disinformation on Credibility
Schneider, E. J., & Boman, C. D. (2023) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2023.2219704 · Cited by 6
Kondratov, E. (2024) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2024.2307096 · Cited by 5
Simon, J., & Sonnicksen, J. (2024) · Politische Vierteljahresschrift · doi:10.1007/s11615-023-00527-6 · Cited by 4
The 1619 Project Moral Panic: The Role of Cable News
Leeds, T. (2024) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spae026 · Cited by 4
Examining the Democratic Potential of Data Journalism in Curing Misinformation
Guan, T., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2022.2124433 · Cited by 4
Baek, Y. M., Ahn, S.-C., & Kim, W.-G. (2019) · Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies · doi:10.20879/kjjcs.2019.63.5.004 · Cited by 4
Testing Classical Predictors of Public Willingness to Censor on the Desire to Block Fake News Online
Martin, J. D., & Hassan, F. (2021) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565211012552 · Cited by 4
Bouchard, G., Caldarelli, G., & Plachouras, V. (2019) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3331184.3331645 · Cited by 4
Klawier, T. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/5sn9z · Cited by 4
George, N., Sham, A., Ajith, T., et al. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4899259 · Cited by 4
Klaus, E., & Kaciaf, N. (2024) · Politiques de communication · doi:10.3917/pdc.022.0005 · Cited by 4
Laughlin, C. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2025.2501027 · Cited by 3
Grahn, H., Kalsnes, B., Isaksson, E., Mayerhöffer, E., Ólafsson, J. G., Falkheimer, J., Henriksen, F. M., Kristensen, J. B., & Saari, D. (2025) · Nordicom review/NORDICOM review · doi:10.2478/nor-2025-0015 · Cited by 4
Suspicious stories: taking narrative seriously in disinformation research
Sadler, N. (2025) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtaf013 · Cited by 6
Tian, Y., Yang, X., Peng, Y., & Mukerjee, S. (2025) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaf035 · Cited by 3
From Liberty to Liability: EU Responses to the Abuse of Freedom of Expression Online
Šramel, B., & Michal, S. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14090557 · Cited by 3
“This differs from misinformation, which denotes the unintentional sharing of inaccurate content (Benkler et al. 2018).”
The fundamental rights risks of countering cognitive warfare with artificial intelligence
Lahmann, H., Custers, B. H. M., & Scott, B. I. (2025) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-025-09868-9 · Cited by 12
“How - ever, it has been pointed out that “evidence of sustained effort is not the same as evidence of impact or prevalence” (Benkler et al., 2018 , p. 254).”
Akande, A., & Kellner, D. M. (2025) · Springer Studies in American Politics. · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98627-7_1 · Cited by 3
Ahmmad, M., Yaqoub, M., & Al-Kassimi, K. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1722-9.ch006 · Cited by 3
Extracting narrative signals from public discourse: a network-based approach
Pournaki, A., & Willaert, T. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06017-x · Cited by 5
“…narratives include stories about power and where it resides, such as online conspiracy theories that position power with an invisible political elite (Birchall and Knight, 2022), or stories that shape collective identities, and that pit an “us” against an opposing “them” (Benkler et al., 2018).”
Vaezi, R. (2025) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-05-2025-0507 · Cited by 3
Barisione, M., Rama, I., & Marolla, F. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2606101 · Cited by 5
“These risks are amplified by the broad reach of social media platforms, which facilitate the rapid dissemination of content to vast audiences (Benkler et al., 2018).”
Beacken, G. D., Trauthig, I. K., & Woolley, S. (2026) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517251410064 · Cited by 6
“All of these communicative strategies appear in all three types of governmental settings (democratic, semi-democratic, and authoritarian), but they serve different political purposes (Benkler et al., 2018; Levitsky and Way, 2002; Woolley, 2023).”
Wiedekind, J., & Lemke, C. (2023) · Journal of Transatlantic Studies · doi:10.1057/s42738-023-00108-w · Cited by 3
Promoting prevention to fake news through an educational software
Santos, V. V. D. A., & Pereira, C. P. (2024) · Journal on Interactive Systems · doi:10.5753/jis.2024.3769 · Cited by 3
Chagas, V. H. C. D. S. (2024) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2024.2355114 · Cited by 3
Disinformation as a Security Problem
Hellman, M. (2024) · The Palgrave Macmillan series in international political communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58747-4_1 · Cited by 4
Regulação das plataformas digitais no Brasil e a defesa da soberania nacional
Pereira, L. D. A., & Júnior, J. L. D. M. F. (2024) · Revista de Ciências do Estado · doi:10.35699/2525-8036.2024.52248 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2018-10-18
- OpenAlex
- W4213327489
- Cited by
- 1,504
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 269 · 2025: 260 · 2024: 206 · 2023: 198 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 173 · 2020: 172 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 116.61
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- 2016 US presidential election, Donald Trump, disinformation, media polarization, conservative media, Steve Bannon, Fox News, Mueller investigation, counter-narratives, media and democracy, public sphere
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
